Menu
Skills in this repository
SkillsMP has collected 3,969 skills from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Open a skill to review its source and details.
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsShowing 40 of 3,969 collected skills.
Use when judging whether a topic is a timely, important policy question the Economic Policy (EP) Panel would commission and want to debate. Tests Panel-worthiness and policy timeliness; it does not invent evidence or citations.
Use when deciding which ecopol-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic pitch through post-panel revision for an Economic Policy (EP) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
Use when an Economic Policy (EP) manuscript's prose reads like a technical report instead of accessible policy writing. Rewrites for the EP dual audience — non-technical main text, rigor in the appendix; it does not invent evidence or citations.
Use when staking an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscript's contribution against prior experiments and the behavioral theory it tests. Sharpens positioning; it does not invent results or citations.
Use when responding to a revise-and-resubmit or referee report for an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscript — including when a referee demands a new treatment, more sessions, or raises a deception/power concern. Plans the response; it does not run the…
Use when anticipating the experimentalist referee's objections for an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscript before submission. Pre-empts the standard pushbacks; it does not draft the response letter (see expecon-rebuttal).
Use when assembling the data, code, instructions, and experiment software for an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscript to meet the ESA reproducibility standard. Builds the deposit; it does not run the analysis or draft prose.
Use when turning the behavioral or game-theoretic argument behind an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscript into pre-specified, testable predictions. Develops the hypotheses tested; it does not run estimation or invent citations.
Use when deciding whether a question is a method-defined fit for an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscript and which treatment contrast to build it around. Frames the fit decision; it does not invent results or citations.
Use when deciding which expecon-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from design through rebuttal for an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
Use when the prose of an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscript buries the design or the result, or when the intro/abstract do not land for an experimentalist reader. Polishes structure and voice; it does not change the analysis.
Use when the contribution of an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript relative to the international-macro frontier and the sibling journals is unclear or undersold. Stakes the claim against JIE/JIMF/JMCB and the IMF research stream; it does not select the…
Use when an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) R&R or decision letter arrived and you need a response-letter strategy for a dual academic/policy referee panel. Plans and drafts the response; it returns to imfer-submission for the resubmission preflight and does not…
Use when anticipating the objections a dual academic/policy IMF Economic Review (IMFER) referee will raise, so a manuscript pre-empts them before submission or addresses them in revision. Plans the defense; it does not draft the response letter…
Use when an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript's data and code must be packaged for reproducibility — including restricted IMF/central-bank data paths, cross-country source lineage, and a runnable environment. Builds the package; it does not produce the…
Use when an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript needs an open-economy model to discipline, interpret, or generate counterfactuals for its evidence — whether a full international-finance model leads the paper or a light framework supports an empirical…
Use when deciding whether a question is right for an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript — international macro-finance with genuine policy relevance and an IMF-program or global-institution audience. Tests fit and scope; it does not run the identification…
Use when deciding which imfer-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
Use when an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript's prose must land for its dual academic/policy audience — a tight intro, an italicized abstract with JEL codes, Chicago style, and a clear policy "so what." Sharpens the writing; it does not build the…
Use when staking a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) manuscript's contribution against the behavioral, experimental, and organizational literatures. Builds the "what we knew / what was missing / what this adds" frame and a…
Use when a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) decision letter arrives and a response-to-referees strategy is needed — triaging a revise-and-resubmit, ordering concessions vs. pushback, and re-running experiments where required. Plans the…
Use when anticipating the objections a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) referee will raise before submitting — demand effects, mechanism-vs-alternative, external validity, sibling-journal fit. Pre-empts the modal JEBO referee; it does not…
Use when assembling the data, code, and experimental-materials deposit for a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) manuscript — z-Tree/oTree code, instructions, raw and analysis data, and an Elsevier Research Data / Mendeley Data statement.…
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) via Elsevier Editorial Manager — abstract/keyword/JEL limits, author-date references, single-anonymized formatting, declarations, and the…
Use when a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) manuscript needs a behavioral or bounded-rationality model to organize, predict, or interpret its evidence. Right-sizes theory in a pluralist journal — from a sharp testable prediction to a…
Use when deciding whether a behavioral, experimental, or organizational question fits the Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) rather than a sibling outlet, and how to frame it. Sharpens scope and the behavioral hook; it does not invent…
Use when a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) manuscript's prose buries the behavioral mechanism, or the abstract and introduction do not land for a pluralist behavioral audience. Shapes the mechanism-forward narrative and Elsevier-format…
Use when staking a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript's contribution against both the geographical-economics and human-geography frontiers, and against sibling journals. Sharpens positioning; it does not invent citations.
Use when a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) decision letter arrives and you must plan a revision and response that satisfies a cross-disciplinary referee pair. Structures the rebuttal; it does not invent results or concede the core claim.
Use when anticipating referee objections for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript, where the panel typically pairs an economist with a geographer. Maps likely cross-disciplinary objections to fixes; it does not invent results.
Use when assembling data, code, and spatial-data documentation for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript. Builds a credible, shareable package under JEG's encouragement-based post-acceptance policy; it does not invent data.
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript via OUP / ScholarOne — word and abstract limits, double-anonymous scrub, ORCID, keywords/JEL, and house style. Final checks; it does not draft content.
Use when the model or conceptual frame is the bottleneck for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript — NEG / quantitative-spatial models OR conceptual frameworks from human geography. Makes the mechanism legible to both communities; it does not…
Use when choosing or sharpening the research question for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript so it genuinely bridges geographical economics and human geography. Tests two-community fit and scope; it does not invent evidence or citations.
Use when deciding which jegeo-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
Use when the prose, intro, or abstract of a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript must reach economists and geographers at once. Tunes voice, structure, and the 100-word abstract; it does not invent results.
Use when staking a Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) manuscript's contribution against the new-institutional / positive-political-economy frontier — locating it relative to Williamson/North/Weingast and to sibling journals. Sharpens the…
Use when a Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) decision letter has arrived and you need a response-letter strategy — triaging an institutional-economist referee's report into a credible revision and point-by-point reply. Plans the rebuttal; it…
Use when anticipating the referee read on a Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) manuscript before submitting — modeling the institutional/organizational economist who will review it and pre-empting the objections that sink JLEO papers.…
Use when assembling the data and code replication package for a Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) manuscript — building reproducible paths from institutional/organizational/political data sources (court records, contracts, legislative data,…