code-reviewer

Review code for quality, bugs, and improvements. Use when user wants code review or quality assessment.

Repository: camel-ai/camel
Last source activity: February 5, 2026 at 10:57
Detected SKILL.md language: English
Stars: 17,580
Forks: 2,039

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.

A direct command skips the review prompt. Inspect the source before running it.

npx skills add https://github.com/camel-ai/camel --skill code-reviewer

The command stays on one line. Scroll horizontally to inspect it before copying.

Prefer a local copy? Download the files currently available to SkillsMP.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

SKILL.md

Source instructions · Read-only preview

Back to search Back to installation

docs-incremental-update

Incrementally update Mintlify documentation (.mdx) from Python source changes only. Use when: (1) Python files referenced in doc_code_map frontmatter have changed, (2) a PR touches Python modules documented in docs/mintlify/key_modules/ or docs/mintlify/mcp/, (3) the user asks to sync docs after Python code changes. Prefer minimal diffs and leave correct content untouched.

2026-03-21

skill-creator

Guide for creating effective skills. Use when creating a new skill or updating an existing skill that extends agent capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.

2026-02-07

data-analyzer

Analyze datasets and extract insights. Use when user needs to understand data patterns, statistics, or trends.

2026-02-05

View all from this repository

name	code-reviewer
description	Review code for quality, bugs, and improvements. Use when user wants code review or quality assessment.

Code Reviewer

Perform thorough code reviews focusing on quality and correctness.

Review Checklist

Correctness - Does the code do what it's supposed to?
Readability - Is the code easy to understand?
Performance - Are there any obvious inefficiencies?
Security - Are there potential vulnerabilities?
Best Practices - Does it follow language conventions?

Output Format

## Code Review Summary

**Overall Assessment**: [Good/Needs Work/Critical Issues]

### Issues Found
| Severity | Line | Issue | Suggestion |
|----------|------|-------|------------|
| High     | 42   | ...   | ...        |

### Positive Aspects
- [What's done well]

### Recommendations
1. [Priority fix 1]
2. [Priority fix 2]

Severity Levels

Critical: Security issues, data loss risks
High: Bugs, incorrect logic
Medium: Performance issues, code smells
Low: Style issues, minor improvements

code-reviewer

Source facts

Install options

Review the source files

More from this repository

Code Reviewer

Review Checklist

Output Format

Severity Levels

Code Reviewer

Review Checklist

Output Format

Severity Levels

More from this repository