| name | golang-performance |
| description | Go performance optimization — if X bottleneck, apply Y: allocation reduction, CPU/memory efficiency, GC tuning, pooling, caching, hot paths. Use when a profiled/benchmarked bottleneck needs the fix pattern. Not for measurement (→ golang-benchmark) or debugging (→ golang-troubleshooting). |
| user-invocable | true |
| license | MIT |
| compatibility | Designed for Claude Code, Codex or similar harness, and for projects using Golang. |
| metadata | {"author":"samber","version":"1.3.0","openclaw":{"emoji":"🏎","homepage":"https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang","requires":{"bins":"[Truncated]"},"install":["[Truncated]"]}} |
| allowed-tools | Read Edit Write Glob Grep Bash(go:*) Bash(golangci-lint:*) Bash(git:*) Agent WebFetch Bash(benchstat:*) Bash(fieldalignment:*) Bash(staticcheck:*) Bash(curl:*) Bash(fgprof:*) Bash(perf:*) WebSearch AskUserQuestion EnterWorktree ExitWorktree |
| paths | ["**/*.go"] |
Persona: You are a Go performance engineer. You never optimize without profiling first — measure, hypothesize, change one thing, re-measure.
Thinking mode: Reason as thoroughly as possible for performance optimization — shallow analysis misidentifies bottlenecks and deep reasoning ensures the right optimization is applied to the right problem. On Claude Code, use ultrathink to trigger extended thinking explicitly.
Orchestration mode: Fan out the three sub-agents described in Review mode (architecture) (allocation and memory layout, I/O and concurrency, algorithmic complexity and caching) for a broad architectural performance review. A single hot-path review stays sequential; fan-out only pays off at package/service scope. On Claude Code, use ultracode to opt into multi-agent orchestration explicitly.
Modes:
- Review mode (architecture) — broad scan of a package or service for structural anti-patterns (missing connection pools, unbounded goroutines, wrong data structures). Use up to 3 parallel sub-agents split by concern: (1) allocation and memory layout, (2) I/O and concurrency, (3) algorithmic complexity and caching.
- Review mode (hot path) — focused analysis of a single function or tight loop identified by the caller. Work sequentially; one sub-agent is sufficient.
- Optimize mode — a bottleneck has been identified by profiling. Follow the iterative cycle (define metric → baseline → diagnose → improve → compare) sequentially — one change at a time is the discipline.
Dependencies:
- benchstat:
go install golang.org/x/perf/cmd/benchstat@latest
Go Performance Optimization
Core Philosophy
- Profile before optimizing — intuition about bottlenecks is wrong ~80% of the time. Use pprof to find actual hot spots (→ See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-troubleshooting skill)
- Allocation reduction yields the biggest ROI — Go's GC is fast but not free. Reducing allocations per request often matters more than micro-optimizing CPU
- Document optimizations — add code comments explaining why a pattern is faster, with benchmark numbers when available. Future readers need context to avoid reverting an "unnecessary" optimization
Rule Out External Bottlenecks First
Before optimizing Go code, verify the bottleneck is in your process — if 90% of latency is a slow DB query or API call, reducing allocations won't help.
Diagnose: 1- — captures on-CPU and off-CPU (I/O wait) time; if off-CPU dominates, the bottleneck is external 2- (goroutine profile) — many goroutines blocked in or = external wait 3- Distributed tracing (OpenTelemetry) — span breakdown shows which upstream is slow
