Skip to main content

week-planner

Weekly planning skill that reviews the week's activities, scans external environment, identifies patterns, and plans proactive tasks for the coming week.

Source facts

Repository
CraftOS-dev/CraftBot
Last source activity
August 7, 2026 at 01:24
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
417
Forks
52

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
week-planner
description
Weekly planning skill that reviews the week's activities, scans external environment, identifies patterns, and plans proactive tasks for the coming week.
user-invocable
false
action-sets
["file_operations","proactive","scheduler","google_calendar","notion","web"]
# Week Planner Weekly review and planning for proactive task management. This skill runs on Sundays to review the past week and plan ahead. ## Trigger Context You receive a planner trigger with: - `scope`: "week" - `type`: "proactive_planner" --- ## CRITICAL: Silent Execution (Override Standard Task Rules) **This skill overrides standard task completion rules.** Unlike regular tasks: - **NO acknowledgement**: Do NOT acknowledge task receipt to user - **NO confirmation**: Do NOT wait for user confirmation before ending - **MUST end silently**: Use `end_turn` immediately after completing planning work **EXCEPTION - Suggesting New Tasks:** When you want to suggest a new recurring or scheduled task: 1. Send the suggestion as your FINAL `send_message` (no `continue_work`) — the run ends on that question 2. The user's reply arrives as a new run: if they approve → add the task, then end silently 3. If they reject → end silently without adding 4. If no reply ever comes, nothing is added — the suggestion simply lapses **Why?** Planner runs happen automatically. Waiting for confirmation would cause work to pile up. --- ## Core Question Ask yourself: **"How can I help the user get SLIGHTLY closer to their goals THIS WEEK?"** Focus only on what can realistically be accomplished in a single week. Leave long-term strategic planning to the month planner. --- ## CRITICAL RULES - READ BEFORE DOING ANYTHING ### Before Planning - ALWAYS Do These Checks 1. **Check existing scheduled tasks**: Use `scheduled_task_list` to see what's already scheduled 2. **Read PROACTIVE.md**: Check existing recurring tasks and the Goals, Plan, and Status section 3. **Check past work**: `memory_search` and grep `agent_file_system/EVENT.md` for what has already been done this week 4. **Read MEMORY.md**: Understand user context, preferences, and patterns ### Duplicate Prevention (EXTREMELY IMPORTANT) - **NEVER suggest a task the user has already performed** (check EVENT.md / memory_search) - **NEVER suggest a task that already exists** as a recurring or scheduled task - **NEVER add a recurring task that duplicates an existing one** - If user performed a one-time task before and you suggest it again = **VERY BAD** ### Permission Requirements - **Recurring tasks**: MUST get explicit user permission before adding ANY new recurring task - **Immediate tasks**: MUST get user permission, unless it's a tier 0 task - **Scheduled tasks**: MUST get user permission before scheduling regardless of tier ### Conservatism Principle It MUST be **EXTREMELY HARD** for you to suggest ANYTHING: - Add new recurring tasks → **ONLY if user explicitly said "I want this automated"** - Suggest new tasks to the user → **ONLY if user did this 3+ times AND it's genuinely valuable** - Schedule tasks → **ONLY if user explicitly requested scheduling** **DO NOT annoy the user** by suggesting things they did not ask for. **DO NOT suggest based on a single occurrence** - this is a critical mistake. **WHEN IN DOUBT, DO NOT SUGGEST.** --- ## Guiding Principles **Evidence over assumption**: Only act on what user has said or done, never on what you think they might want. **Silence over noise**: Most weeks should have minimal new suggestions. Focus on the weekly summary. **Quality over quantity**: One genuinely valuable suggestion beats five mediocre ones. **Stop signals**: If user says "stop", "later", ignores suggestions, or disables tasks you suggested - reduce intervention. **Know the user, not the universe**: Only check external sources relevant to THIS user based on their profile, goal, career, time/location or demonstrated interests. --- ## Determining If User Needs Proactive Assistance **DEFAULT STANCE: DO NOT SUGGEST ANYTHING.** Before suggesting ANY proactive task, you must have OVERWHELMING evidence. Most planner runs should result in ZERO suggestions. ### The 3+ Rule (MANDATORY) **A single occurrence of ANYTHING is NEVER sufficient to suggest a task.** - User asked for weather ONCE → **DO NOT suggest weather task** - User checked email ONCE → **DO NOT suggest email task** - User mentioned something ONCE → **DO NOT suggest anything** **MINIMUM threshold for ANY suggestion:** - User did the EXACT same task **3+ times** manually, OR - User **explicitly said** "I want you to do X automatically/regularly" **NO EXCEPTIONS.** If you cannot point to 3+ occurrences or an explicit request, DO NOT SUGGEST. ### Evidence-Based Need Assessment | Question | If YES | If NO | |----------|--------|-------| | Did the user explicitly request this type of help? | Consider suggesting | Do NOT suggest | | Has the user repeatedly done this task manually? | May automate **ONLY if 3+ times** | Do NOT automate | | Did the user mention this as a pain point? | Consider helping **ONLY if mentioned 3+ times** | Do NOT assume | | Is this blocking user's stated goals? | May be valuable | Probably not urgent | | Has user rejected similar suggestions before? | Do NOT suggest again | N/A | ### Evidence Types (Strongest to Weakest) | Evidence Level | Description | Action | |----------------|-------------|--------| | **Explicit Request** | User said "I want X automated/recurring" | Safe to suggest | | **Repeated Behavior** | User did X **3+ times** manually | May suggest with permission | | **Stated Pain Point** | User complained about X **multiple times** | May suggest as solution | | **Single Occurrence** | User did X once | **ABSOLUTELY DO NOT suggest** | | **Your Assumption** | You think user might want X | **ABSOLUTELY DO NOT suggest** | ### Red Flags - DO NOT Proceed If: - User has not interacted in 24+ hours (they may be busy) - User dismissed similar suggestions recently - Task would interrupt user's current focus - No clear evidence user wants this help - You're assuming user needs something they never mentioned - **User only did this task 1-2 times** (NOT ENOUGH) - **You cannot cite 3+ specific instances from past work (EVENT.md / memory)** ### Green Flags - May Consider If: - User explicitly asked for proactive help with this area and it is not processed yet - User has done this exact task **3+ times** manually (with evidence in EVENT.md / memory) - User **explicitly said** "I want this automated" or "Can you do this regularly" - Task is tier 0 (silent, no interruption) --- ## What Makes a GOOD Proactive Task A good proactive task has ALL of these qualities: | Quality | Description | Bad Example | Good Example | |---------|-------------|-------------|--------------| | **Explicit Need** | User asked for it or clearly needs it | "User might like email summaries" | "User asked me to summarize emails daily" | | **Clear Value** | Obvious benefit to user | "Check random websites" | "Monitor competitor pricing user tracks" | | **Appropriate Frequency** | Not too often, not too rare | "Remind user every hour" | "Weekly report on Sundays" | | **Measurable Outcome** | You can tell if it worked | "Help user be productive" | "Compile daily standup notes by 9am" | | **Non-Intrusive** | Respects user's attention | "Send 5 notifications daily" | "Silently prepare draft, notify once" | | **Reversible** | User can undo or cancel | "Automatically send emails" | "Draft email for user review" | ### Task Quality Checklist Before suggesting ANY task, it must pass ALL checks: - [ ] User explicitly requested or clearly needs this - [ ] Not duplicating existing task or completed work - [ ] Frequency is appropriate (not annoying) - [ ] Value is clear and measurable - [ ] Tier/permission level is appropriate - [ ] User can easily disable or modify it --- ## Annoyance Prevention ### Guiding Principles **ASSUME THE USER DOES NOT WANT SUGGESTIONS.** You must have overwhelming evidence to override this assumption. - **Frequency**: Suggest EXTREMELY sparingly - most months should have no new suggestions - **Spacing**: Give user breathing room between any suggestions - **Recurring tasks**: ALMOST NEVER suggest new recurring tasks - **Rejection**: If user rejected something, do not suggest it again - **Single occurrence**: NEVER suggest based on something user did only once ### Signals User is Annoyed (STOP SUGGESTING) - User says "stop", "enough", "later", "not now" - User ignores 2+ consecutive suggestions - User disables a task you suggested - User reduces notification frequency - User mentions being "busy" or "overwhelmed" ### Quality Over Quantity - Better to suggest **nothing** than something mediocre - Better to **wait** than rush a suggestion - Better to **ask once** than nag - Better to **be silent** than be annoying - **99% of planner runs should produce ZERO suggestions** ### The Annoyance Test Before ANY suggestion, ask: 1. Would I be annoyed if I received this? 2. Is this genuinely helpful or just "something to do"? 3. Am I suggesting this because user needs it, or because I can? 4. Have I already suggested something similar recently? 5. **Can I cite 3+ specific instances where user did this task?** 6. **Did user EXPLICITLY ask for this to be automated?** If you hesitate on ANY of these → DO NOT suggest. If you cannot answer YES to question 5 or 6 → DO NOT suggest. --- ## Context Layers ``` Layer 1: WHO is the user? (USER.md - static profile) ↓ Layer 2: WHAT's their situation? (PROACTIVE.md - dynamic context) ↓ Layer 3: WHAT's happening now? (External sources - selective) ``` Use Layer 1 + Layer 2 to determine which external sources to check in Layer 3. --- ## Workflow ### Step 1: Weekly Review (Internal) Gather and analyze the week's data: 1. **EVENT.md** (grep this week's entries) - Work completed this week 2. **MEMORY.md** - Learnings and facts recorded this week 3. **PROACTIVE.md** - Recurring task execution history and Goals/Plan/Status 4. **USER.md** - User preferences and context 5. **scheduled_task_list** - What's currently scheduled ### Step 2: Scan External Environment (Selective) Based on USER.md interests and connected integrations, check ONLY what's relevant to this user. Here are some examples: **Calendar & Schedule** (if Google Calendar connected): ``` check_calendar_availability(start_date="[week_start]", end_date="[week_end]") ``` - Note: meeting patterns, busy days, recurring events - Identify: heavy meeting days vs. focus time available - Look for: upcoming deadlines, travel, important events **Task Management** (check connected tools): ``` IF Notion connected: search_notion(query="tasks") query_notion_database(database_id="[task_db_id]") → Gather: all pending tasks, overdue items, upcoming deadlines IF Apple Reminders (macOS): remindctl week remindctl overdue ``` - Summarize: task distribution across the week - Note: any backlog building up **Communication Patterns** (if user engages): ``` IF Gmail connected: → Note patterns: response times, pending threads IF Slack connected: → Note: team activity patterns, recurring requests ``` **Weekly Context** (based on user interests): ``` IF user has projects with external dependencies: → Check project status, blockers IF user mentioned upcoming events (conference, travel, deadline): → Gather relevant information IF user works in specific domain: → Check relevant weekly news/updates ONLY if they've engaged before ``` **SKIP if:** - User has never used the integration - User ignored suggestions from this source - No evidence user cares about this domain ### Step 3: Pattern Analysis Identify (with evidence only): - **Repeated requests**: User asked for similar things multiple times - **Manual work**: Tasks user did manually that could be automated - **Successful automation**: Recurring tasks that delivered value - **Failed automation**: Tasks user ignored or disabled - **External engagement**: Which integrations did user actually use this week? - **Information value**: What external info did user engage with vs. ignore? ### Step 4: Evaluate Recurring Tasks For each recurring task, assess effectiveness: - Is it being executed as expected? - Is user engaging with the results? - Has user given positive or negative feedback? If a task is consistently ignored or disabled, consider suggesting to disable it. ### Step 5: Prepare Weekly Summary Create summary including: - Work completed this week (from EVENT.md) - Progress toward goals (from Goals section) - Recurring task performance (if any) - External context (calendar load, task backlog, relevant events) - Focus for next week --- ## Updating PROACTIVE.md Weave internal and external context naturally into the existing sections. **Do NOT create new subsections.** ### Current Focus (Primary Responsibility) ```markdown ### Current Focus <!-- Updated by week/day planner --> This week: Final push on Q1 launch. Calendar shows Mon-Wed heavy with meetings (6 total), Thu-Fri clear for focused work. Key objectives: - Complete code review backlog (3 PRs pending in GitHub) - Finalize launch checklist (7 items remaining in Notion) **Context:** User traveling next week - front-load deliverables. Weather clear for commute runs Mon/Tue. ``` Guidelines: - Include external context (calendar patterns, task counts) - Note situational factors (travel, deadlines, events) - Connect to Long-Term Goals - Maximum 2-3 objectives ### Recent Accomplishments ```markdown ### Recent Accomplishments <!-- Updated by planners after task completion --> - [Week N]: [Major accomplishment] ``` Guidelines: - Summarize the week's achievements - Focus on goal-related progress - Keep last 4-5 weeks ### Recording Patterns (Inline) When you observe patterns from internal + external analysis, record them inline: ```markdown **Observed patterns:** - User most active 9-11am, prefers no interruptions - Heavy meeting days (Mon/Wed) correlate with lower task completion - User engages with GitHub notifications within 1 hour - User ignores LinkedIn notifications - deprioritize ``` Do NOT create a dedicated "Patterns" subsection. Weave into existing sections. ### Long-Term Goals (READ ONLY) The week planner READS Long-Term Goals but does NOT update them. Only the month planner updates Long-Term Goals. --- ## Updating MEMORY.md ### When to Update MEMORY.md Update MEMORY.md with: - Patterns observed over the week - User preferences discovered - Important learnings - Behavioral changes - Facts that affect how you should help user ### What to Store | Store In MEMORY.md | Do NOT Store | |-------------------|--------------| | User's stated preferences | Your assumptions | | Facts user shared | Daily minutiae | | Patterns you observed | Temporary states | | Important deadlines | Already in EVENT.md | | Context for future help | Duplicate information | ### Format ```markdown ## [Category] ### [Date] - [Brief Title] [Factual observation or user statement] ``` --- ## Outputs ### Output 1: Weekly Summary Message (REQUIRED) Send weekly summary to user via `send_message` with star prefix. ### Output 2: Update PROACTIVE.md Update "Current Focus" and "Recent Accomplishments". ### Output 3: Update MEMORY.md Record weekly patterns and observations. ### Output 4: Manage Recurring Tasks (WITH PERMISSION - RARE) Only if ALL of these are true: 1. User explicitly requested this automation 2. Task doesn't already exist 3. Clear value proposition 4. Appropriate frequency ``` recurring_add( name="Task Name", frequency="weekly", instruction="...", day="monday",
View on GitHub
This SKILL.md is very large, so SkillsMP previews the first section here. View on GitHub