content-usability-review

name	content-usability-review
description	Review product content in context for comprehension, scanability, actionability, consistency, accessibility, inclusivity, and localization risk.

Content Usability Review

Use when this procedure is the primary professional method needed for the assignment.

Procedure

1. Confirm the decision or outcome this work must support, its scope, owner, constraints, and definition of success.
2. Establish the evidence baseline using rendered product, content inventory, research evidence, accessibility requirements, and localization constraints. Do not fill material gaps with assumptions when they can change the result.
3. Walk real tasks state by state, flag terminology drift and cognitive load, test critical instructions/errors, inspect variable/plural constraints, and prioritize issues by task impact.
4. Exercise realistic edge, failure, transition, or exception cases that could invalidate the result; record unresolved uncertainty explicitly.
5. Validate the output against the original outcome and any neighboring professional contracts so this skill does not silently absorb another specialist's authority.
6. Record the resulting artifact, measurements, decisions, provenance, and handoff information needed for another owner to reproduce or continue the work.

Quality gate

High-impact content defects have concrete replacement or structural recommendations and are verified in context.