structure-long-prompt

name

structure-long-prompt

description

Use when the user wants to convert CLAUDE.md, a system prompt, or any long instruction file into TOON — or asks how to compress / restructure a long prose prompt. Pushes back on TOON for prose (wrong tool) and recommends XML-tag section delimiters, the Anthropic-recommended pattern for long/complex prompts. Acts as a guardrail against TOON-ifying instruction files where the format would degrade comprehension.

Structure a Long Prompt (don't TOON-ify it)

This skill exists because TOON is the wrong tool for prose instruction files (CLAUDE.md, system prompts, long user prompts) — but the instinct to "compress my long prompt" is real and valid. This skill redirects that instinct to a better technique: XML section tags.

When this skill fires

Trigger when the user says any of:

• "convert my CLAUDE.md to TOON"
• "TOON-ify my system prompt / instructions / long prompt"
• "how do I compress this long prompt"
• "shorten my CLAUDE.md"
• anything that pairs prose instructions with TOON / structured-format conversion

Do not fire for: data files (JSON/CSV/YAML), configuration, or repeating-record content. Those go to the other skills in this plugin.

What to tell the user (deliver this verbatim or close)

TOON is built for structured data — uniform records with shared keys (inventory rows, log entries, dataset slices). Its compactness comes from sharing field headers across many records.

Instruction files are prose directives. There's no repeating-record structure for TOON to compress. Converting prose to TOON either forces it into awkward key-value shapes (which degrades how reliably the LLM follows the instructions) or just wraps strings in TOON scaffolding (which adds tokens and saves nothing).

Will Claude parse TOON in a CLAUDE.md? Yes — Claude reads whatever bytes are in the file. But "parses" ≠ "follows as well as prose." LLMs are trained on enormous markdown/prose corpora; they internalize directives in that form most reliably.

The actually-useful technique: XML section tags

For long or complex prompts where sections are getting blurred or ignored, wrap each section in XML tags. This is Anthropic's own recommended pattern (see the prompt-engineering guide on <thinking>, <example>, etc.).

Why it works:

• Hard section boundaries — the model can't bleed one rule into another.
• Tags are named — easy to reference later in the prompt ("apply the rules in <autonomy> here").
• Token cost is roughly identical to markdown headings.
• Mixes cleanly with markdown inside each tag.

Example transformation

Before (markdown headings):

## Autonomy Directive
Just keep going. Don't ask permission...

## Naming
Repos use Train-Case...

## Plans
Save plans to planning/ in the current repo...

After (XML-tagged sections):

<autonomy>
Just keep going. Don't ask permission...
</autonomy>

<naming>
Repos use Train-Case...
</naming>

<plans>
Save plans to planning/ in the current repo...
</plans>

Markdown inside the tags still renders/reads fine. The tags give Claude unambiguous section boundaries.

When to apply it

XML tags are a surgical fix, not a wholesale rewrite. Recommend them when:

• The prompt is long enough that sections are getting confused or ignored.
• A specific directive keeps being missed despite being in the file.
• Sections have very different character (rules vs. context vs. examples) and you want the model to treat them differently.
• The user wants to reference a section by name later in the same prompt or in a tool result.

For a short CLAUDE.md (say, < 50 lines of prose), markdown headings are fine — don't churn it.

What this skill does, operationally

1. Confirm the user's actual goal — "compress / shorten" vs. "make it more reliably followed."
2. Explain why TOON is the wrong tool (use the block above).
3. If they want better adherence on a long prompt: offer to add XML section tags to a specific file. Read the file, propose tag names per section, apply with Edit.
4. If they just want it shorter: that's a content question, not a format question. Offer to identify redundant or stale directives.
5. Never produce a TOON version of a prose instruction file, even if the user insists — explain that the plugin deliberately doesn't do that, and point at the XML approach instead.

What to leave alone

• Tabular fragments inside CLAUDE.md (e.g. a context-files table) — markdown tables are already efficient and Claude reads them fine. Don't TOON-ify them either; they're tiny.
• Memory pointer files (MEMORY.md index) — already a one-line-per-entry list, no benefit from restructuring.

Other formats considered (and rejected for prose)

Format	Verdict for instruction files
Markdown	Best default. Heavily represented in LLM training data.
XML tags	Best for long/complex prompts with hard section boundaries.
Plain prose	Fine but loses scannable structure.
YAML	Good for config (key: value), bad for prose — strings get awkward.
TOON / JSON	Wrong tool. Built for data.
TOML	Same problem as YAML for prose.

The recommendation hierarchy is: markdown → markdown + XML tags for long/complex → never a data format.