Skip to main content

dayfinggg/openai-codex-agent-skills

SkillsMP has collected 20 skills from dayfinggg/openai-codex-agent-skills. Open a skill to review its source and details.

Latest recorded source activity
SkillsMP catalog refreshed
skills collected
20
GitHub stars
4
GitHub forks
0

Skills in this repository

classification pending

Showing 20 of 20 collected skills.

occupation
unclassified
description

Design types, interfaces, module boundaries, and ownership before implementing a non-trivial feature or structural change. Use when an early design choice would constrain several files or components. Do not use for a small local edit or when an approved…

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Prepare and assign one bounded, independently verifiable subtask to a subagent. Use when delegation is available and authorized, one work unit can proceed without shared mutable state, and parallel or specialized work will materially help. Do not use merely…

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Reproduce a failure, regression, or performance problem and identify its root cause with evidence. Use when the user asks why something is broken, failing, crashing, flaky, or slow. Do not modify the implementation unless the request also asks for a fix.

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Transfer active engineering work to another agent or session without losing decisions, evidence, or the next executable step. Use when the user requests a handoff, work must continue elsewhere, or context limits threaten continuity. Do not use as a generic…

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Determine what a proposed or completed change could break outside its immediate diff. Use for blast-radius analysis, shared contracts, migrations, risky refactors, and changes to public interfaces or persistent data. Do not use for a general code review with…

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Make an authorized code or configuration change from a settled request, specification, or task. Use when the user asks to build, fix, add, or change something and the implementation scope is clear. Do not use for diagnosis-only, review-only, or planning-only…

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Maintain a compact evidence-backed decision trail for long-running, unattended, or high-risk engineering work. Use when later reviewers must understand what changed, why, and what proved it. Do not activate for routine short tasks or duplicate ordinary…

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Move code, callers, data, configuration, or dependencies from an old contract to a new one with explicit compatibility and rollback decisions. Use for API, schema, framework, dependency, or storage migrations. Do not use for a simple isolated replacement with…

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Simplify existing code, improve module depth, or reduce reader load while preserving observable behavior. Use when the user explicitly requests restructuring or when a behavior-preserving cleanup is the task. Do not activate for ordinary feature work that…

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Review a diff, branch, pull request, or work-in-progress change for correctness, requirement fit, regressions, and maintainability. Use when the user asks for code review or assessment of completed changes. Report findings without editing unless a fix is also…

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Break a large or multi-session engineering objective into ordered, verifiable stages with dependencies and checkpoints. Use when the work spans several components or cannot be safely held in one execution pass. This skill plans but does not implement.

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Turn settled requirements or an existing conversation into an implementation-ready specification with testable behavior and explicit scope. Use when the desired outcome is mostly known and needs consolidation. Do not use for open-ended discovery or…

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Apply language, framework, database, security, algorithm, Git, automated-testing, HTML, CSS, accessibility, usability, and interaction-design quality standards when writing, editing, refactoring, reviewing, or organizing source code, tests, schemas,…

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Develop a feature or bug fix through a focused failing-test, minimal-implementation, and refactor loop. Use when the user requests TDD, asks for a regression test, or the bug has an obvious cheap local test target. Do not force TDD when the useful test path…

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Classify an incoming issue, bug report, alert, or external pull request and turn it into an actionable engineering brief. Use when work needs validation, priority, ownership, or missing-information assessment before implementation. Do not solve the issue…

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Prove that completed engineering work satisfies its requirements using the real artifact, focused tests, and diff inspection. Use before declaring implementation complete or when the user asks whether a change actually works. Do not replace diagnosis or code…

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Assemble the smallest trustworthy context needed for an active engineering task. Use when resuming long work, switching subsystems, handing work between agents, or when stale or excessive context is degrading decisions. Do not activate for a small…

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Extract reusable, evidence-supported improvements after a completed engineering session, repeated failure, or explicit retrospective request. Use when the goal is to improve future agent behavior or an existing workflow. Do not activate automatically after…

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Map an unfamiliar codebase, trace runtime flow, locate ownership, and identify the files that matter. Use for codebase orientation, onboarding, placement questions, and investigation before planning. This is a read-only skill and does not design or implement…

updated
occupation
unclassified
description

Fan out several independent investigations or candidate solutions and synthesize them into one judged result. Use when broad coverage, competing designs, or separable evidence lanes justify parallel agents and delegation is authorized. Do not use for…

updated
Showing 20 of 20 collected skills.