Baseline UI workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Validates animation durations, enforces typography scale, checks component accessibility, and prevents layout anti-patterns in Tailwind CSS projects. Use when building UI components, reviewing CSS utilities, styling React views, or enforcing design consistency and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
A direct command skips the review prompt. Inspect the source before running it.
Baseline UI workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Validates animation durations, enforces typography scale, checks component accessibility, and prevents layout anti-patterns in Tailwind CSS projects. Use when building UI components, reviewing CSS utilities, styling React views, or enforcing design consistency and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
This public intake copy packages plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/baseline-ui from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.
Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.
This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses the external_source block in metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.
Baseline UI Enforces an opinionated UI baseline to prevent AI-generated interface slop.
Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: How to use, Stack, Components, Interaction, Animation, Typography.
When to Use This Skill
Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.
You are building or reviewing Tailwind-based UI and want a strict baseline for accessibility, motion, typography, and layout.
The task is to prevent generic or sloppy AI-generated interface decisions before they spread through the codebase.
You need concrete UI constraints to apply to a file review or an ongoing frontend implementation.
Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Validates animation durations, enforces typography scale, checks component accessibility, and prevents layout anti-patterns in Tailwind CSS projects. Use when building UI components, reviewing CSS utilities, styling....
Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.
Use when provenance needs to stay visible in the answer, PR, or review packet.
Operating Table
Situation
Start here
Why it matters
First-time use
metadata.json
Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path through the external_source block before touching the copied workflow
Provenance review
ORIGIN.md
Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source
Workflow execution
SKILL.md
Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution
Supporting context
SKILL.md
Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package
Handoff decision
## Related Skills
Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts
Workflow
This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.
Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.
Execute the upstream workflow while keeping provenance and source boundaries explicit in the working notes.
Validate the result against the upstream expectations and the evidence you can point to in the copied files.
Escalate or hand off to a related skill when the work moves out of this imported workflow's center of gravity.
Before merge or closure, record what was used, what changed, and what the reviewer still needs to verify.
Imported Workflow Notes
Imported: How to use
/baseline-ui
Apply these constraints to any UI work in this conversation.
/baseline-ui <file>
Review the file against all constraints below and output:
violations (quote the exact line/snippet)
why it matters (1 short sentence)
a concrete fix (code-level suggestion)
Examples
Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly
Use @baseline-ui to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.
Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.
Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review
Review @baseline-ui against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.
Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.
Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution
Use @baseline-ui for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.
Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.
Example 4: Build a reviewer packet
Review @baseline-ui using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.
Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.
Best Practices
Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.
Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
Point directly at the copied upstream files that justify the workflow instead of relying on generic review boilerplate.
Treat generated examples as scaffolding; adapt them to the concrete task before execution.
Route to a stronger native skill when architecture, debugging, design, or security concerns become dominant.
Troubleshooting
Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically
Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/baseline-ui, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all.
Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Check the external_source block first, then restate the provenance before continuing.
Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review
Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task.
Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.
Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization
Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better.
Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.
Related Skills
@00-andruia-consultant - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
@00-andruia-consultant-v2 - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
@10-andruia-skill-smith - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
@10-andruia-skill-smith-v2 - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
Additional Resources
Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.
Resource family
What it gives the reviewer
Example path
references
copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream
references/n/a
examples
worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream
examples/n/a
scripts
upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation
scripts/n/a
agents
routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package
agents/n/a
assets
supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package
assets/n/a
Imported Reference Notes
Imported: Stack
MUST use Tailwind CSS defaults unless custom values already exist or are explicitly requested
MUST use motion/react (formerly framer-motion) when JavaScript animation is required
SHOULD use tw-animate-css for entrance and micro-animations in Tailwind CSS
MUST use cn utility (clsx + tailwind-merge) for class logic
Imported: Components
MUST use accessible component primitives for anything with keyboard or focus behavior (Base UI, React Aria, Radix)
MUST use the project’s existing component primitives first
NEVER mix primitive systems within the same interaction surface
SHOULD prefer Base UI for new primitives if compatible with the stack
MUST add an aria-label to icon-only buttons
NEVER rebuild keyboard or focus behavior by hand unless explicitly requested
Imported: Interaction
MUST use an AlertDialog for destructive or irreversible actions
SHOULD use structural skeletons for loading states
NEVER use h-screen, use h-dvh
MUST respect safe-area-inset for fixed elements
MUST show errors next to where the action happens
NEVER block paste in input or textarea elements
Imported: Animation
NEVER add animation unless it is explicitly requested
MUST animate only compositor props (transform, opacity)
NEVER animate layout properties (width, height, top, left, margin, padding)
SHOULD avoid animating paint properties (background, color) except for small, local UI (text, icons)
SHOULD use ease-out on entrance
NEVER exceed 200ms for interaction feedback
MUST pause looping animations when off-screen
SHOULD respect prefers-reduced-motion
NEVER introduce custom easing curves unless explicitly requested
SHOULD avoid animating large images or full-screen surfaces
Imported: Typography
MUST use text-balance for headings and text-pretty for body/paragraphs
MUST use tabular-nums for data
SHOULD use truncate or line-clamp for dense UI
NEVER modify letter-spacing (tracking-*) unless explicitly requested
Imported: Layout
MUST use a fixed z-index scale (no arbitrary z-*)
SHOULD use size-* for square elements instead of w-* + h-*
Imported: Performance
NEVER animate large blur() or backdrop-filter surfaces
NEVER apply will-change outside an active animation
NEVER use useEffect for anything that can be expressed as render logic
Imported: Design
NEVER use gradients unless explicitly requested
NEVER use purple or multicolor gradients
NEVER use glow effects as primary affordances
SHOULD use Tailwind CSS default shadow scale unless explicitly requested
MUST give empty states one clear next action
SHOULD limit accent color usage to one per view
SHOULD use existing theme or Tailwind CSS color tokens before introducing new ones
Imported: Limitations
Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
