| name | field-data-quality-hfc |
| description | High-frequency field data quality skill for World Bank survey and operations workflows. Use when reviewing Lumora follow-up surveys, survey logs, payment records, back-checks, field visits, enumerator effects, completeness, distribution, consistency, or operational follow-up priorities.
|
| workflow_stage | field-operations |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| tags | ["hfc","fieldwork","survey-quality","backchecks","payments"] |
Field Data Quality HFC
Use this skill to produce actionable field follow-up outputs. It is based on the local Lecture Slides - Data quality assurance.pdf.
Checks To Run
Completeness
- Verify unique, non-missing IDs.
- Compare follow-up responses against baseline households.
- Check coverage across district, village, time, and enumerator.
Distribution
- Flag implausible values and unexpected missingness.
- Review survey duration, GPS accuracy, module-missing counts, and high "don't know" counts.
Consistency
- Compare self-reported transfer receipt with payment records.
- Compare district fields across household, payment, and field visit files.
- Compare back-check responses with original survey values.
Survey-specific
- Rank enumerators by short duration, refusals, module missingness, and quality flags.
- Identify early signs of repeated misunderstanding before they become habits.
Field validation
- Use back-checks and field visits to prioritize cases.
- Treat unresolved high-severity visits as urgent.
- Classify each priority issue as a data-entry issue, implementation bottleneck, or human-review case.
Output Requirements
Produce:
outputs/qa_reports/hfc_summary.md;outputs/tables/field_followup_list.csv;- ranked enumerator, district, or provider tables;
- concise field actions for the next payment cycle.
The follow-up list should include enough information for field teams to act,
but it should not imply misconduct from a data flag alone. Separate actions
that can be checked in survey/admin records from actions that require supervisor,
provider, or field-team review.
Use:
