Skip to main content

citation-grounded-factuality-checking

Use this skill when the user wants the agent to judge whether an answer/document is securely backed by authentic evidence, verify exact pinpoint highlight spans, validate strict antecedent document grammar (e.g. tracking 'the' to 'a'), or audit sites for safety/phishing risks and machine-generated stylistic anomalies. Trigger for 'verify this highlighted claim,' 'check if this legal clause has grammatical consistency,' 'is this link a scam?', or 'identify if any of these sentences were polished by AI.' It is essential for eliminating hallucinations, detecting structural phrasing errors, and ensuring document authenticity.

Jump to install

Source facts

Repository
Dingxingdi/paper_fast_search_backup
Last source activity
April 10, 2026 at 01:27
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
0
Forks
0

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

File Explorer
4 files

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
citation-grounded factuality checking
description
Use this skill when the user wants the agent to judge whether an answer/document is securely backed by authentic evidence, verify exact pinpoint highlight spans, validate strict antecedent document grammar (e.g. tracking 'the' to 'a'), or audit sites for safety/phishing risks and machine-generated stylistic anomalies. Trigger for 'verify this highlighted claim,' 'check if this legal clause has grammatical consistency,' 'is this link a scam?', or 'identify if any of these sentences were polished by AI.' It is essential for eliminating hallucinations, detecting structural phrasing errors, and ensuring document authenticity.
# Skill: citation-grounded factuality checking ## 1. Capability Definition & Real Case * **Professional Definition**: The ability to audit and verify document-grounded text across multiple dimensions: (1) Localized attribution of specific generated claims (LAQuer) via recursive decontextualization; (2) Intra-document structural and grammatical integrity (e.g., tracking antecedent basis definitions and checking formatting logic); and (3) Security and stylometric anomaly auditing (detecting spoofing/phishing risks or text regions exhibiting unverified machine-generated authorship). * **Dimension Hierarchy**: Document Validation & Structuring->Verification->citation-grounded factuality checking ### Real Case **[Case 1]** * **Initial Environment**: A generated RAG output answering a query about GMO labeling contains multiple sentences about consumer confusion. * **Real Question**: Verify this specific highlight: 'They deserve to know what they are eating.' * **Real Trajectory**: The agent identifies the pronoun 'They', decontextualizes it by referencing the previous sentence to map 'They' to 'Consumers.' It queries the source material with 'Consumers deserve to know' and localizes a 10-word span: 'Consumers... have a right to know what is in their food'. * **Real Answer**: Supported: 'Consumers... have a right to know what is in their food' (Source: nbcnews.com). * **Why this demonstrates the capability**: This demonstrates localized span-level verification and decontextualization. The agent resolves the ambiguity of the pronoun implicitly before executing precise sub-sentence attribution, ensuring the fact checks the actual intended entity. --- **[Case 2]** * **Initial Environment**: A legal technical description of a biometric processing device is loaded, representing a high-stakes structural document. * **Real Question**: Check the document for internal 'antecedent basis' logic errors regarding processor and display entities. * **Real Trajectory**: The agent performs a structural traversal, linking definite noun phrases ('the [noun]') to their introductory indefinite phrases ('a [noun]'). It verifies 'the processor' links to 'a processor', but flags 'the touchscreen display' as appearing definitively without prior introduction. * **Real Answer**: Error detected: 'The touchscreen display' lacks an antecedent basis. It appears as a definite reference without prior structural introduction. * **Why this demonstrates the capability**: Demonstrates intra-document structural integrity validation. Precise verification involves ensuring terminology continuity, tracking article pairing, and formally evaluating document syntax robustness without external knowledge. --- **[Case 3]** * **Initial Environment**: A document environment features a source claiming to be an 'Official Update' with instructions, though it lacks semantic diversity and alters procedural tone abruptly. * **Real Question**: Verify the authenticity of these software deployment instructions and identify anomalies. * **Real Trajectory**: The agent audits URL metadata and structural layout, while also deploying sliding-window assessments on the text sequence. It flags a phishing warning concerning the URL and identifies that the final paragraph exhibits a stylometric drop in perplexity consistent with machine generation. * **Real Answer**: Warning: Source documentation exhibits phishing risk attributes, and sentences 12-14 show stylometric anomalies symptomatic of unverified AI-generated modifications. * **Why this demonstrates the capability**: Validates extrinsic source authenticity and adversarial grounding safety. Verification requires assessing the meta-integrity of the context itself (phishing risk) and detecting localized authorship stylometric anomalies before trusting the content. ## Pipeline Execution Instructions To synthesize data for this capability, you must strictly follow a 3-phase pipeline. **Do not hallucinate steps.** Read the corresponding reference file for each phase sequentially: 1. **Phase 1: Environment Exploration** Read the exploration guidelines to discover raw knowledge seeds: `references/EXPLORATION.md` 2. **Phase 2: Trajectory Selection** Once Phase 1 is complete, read the selection criteria to evaluate the trajectory: `references/SELECTION.md` 3. **Phase 3: Data Synthesis** Once a trajectory passes Phase 2, read the synthesis instructions to generate the final data: `references/SYNTHESIS.md`
View on GitHub