review-pr-lite

name	review-pr-lite
description	Review a pull request for code quality and security issues without using subagents. Use when the user wants a lighter-weight PR review in a single skill.
targets	["*"]

target_pr = the user's request

If target_pr is not provided, use the PR of the current branch.

Important: Do Not Switch the Local Branch

• Do NOT check out, switch, or otherwise move the local branch (e.g., git checkout, git switch, gh pr checkout).
• To inspect the PR's changes, use git and gh commands that read remote state without moving the working tree. For example:
  • gh pr view $target_pr to read PR metadata and description.
  • gh pr diff $target_pr to read the diff.
  • gh pr view $target_pr --json files or gh api to list changed files.
  • git fetch origin pull/<PR_NUMBER>/head:refs/remotes/origin/pr-<PR_NUMBER> and git diff origin/main...origin/pr-<PR_NUMBER> if a local read-only ref is needed.

Step 1: Gather PR Context

Run the following in parallel:

• Get the PR description and metadata via gh pr view $target_pr (do not check out the PR locally).
• Get the PR diff via gh pr diff $target_pr.
• If needed, inspect changed files individually for deeper context using gh / git commands (e.g., gh api, git show) — without switching the local branch.

Step 2: Review the Changes

Review the PR directly in this skill without calling any subagents.

Focus on both of the following:

1. Code Review

   • Bugs or behavioral regressions
   • Incorrect assumptions or edge cases
   • Missing or weak tests
   • Maintainability issues that could cause near-term problems

2. Security Review

   • Injection risks
   • Auth/authz mistakes
   • Secrets exposure
   • Unsafe file, network, shell, or deserialization behavior
   • Dependency or configuration changes that could weaken security

Step 3: Report Findings

Integrate all findings into one review result. Please output the PR number in the result so that the user can easily find the PR.

Reporting Rules

• Assign a severity level to each finding: low, mid, high, or critical.
• Assign a sequential number to each finding (e.g., #1, #2, #3, ...).
• Present findings first, ordered by severity.
• If no findings are discovered, explicitly state that no findings were found.
• Keep the summary brief and focused on risk and testing gaps.

Step 4: Check GitHub Actions Workflows

After completing the content review, check the status of the GitHub Actions workflows for $target_pr (for example, using gh pr checks or gh run list).

• Report the status of every workflow run to the user, including runs that are still in progress.
• For each failing workflow, also report:
  • The likely cause of the failure (based on the relevant logs or job output).
  • Candidate solutions or next steps to resolve it.