Create a new GitHub issue (feature request or bug report) by gathering an unstructured description from the user, classifying it, filling out the appropriate Kibana template, interviewing the user to improve any weak sections, and filing the issue via the GitHub CLI.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
A direct command skips the review prompt. Inspect the source before running it.
Create a new GitHub issue (feature request or bug report) by gathering an unstructured description from the user, classifying it, filling out the appropriate Kibana template, interviewing the user to improve any weak sections, and filing the issue via the GitHub CLI.
disable-model-invocation
true
Create GitHub Issue
Guide the user through creating a well-structured GitHub issue from scratch.
Step 1 — Gather the unstructured description
Ask the user to describe their feature request or bug report in their own words — no structure required. Tell them to include as much or as little as they know. End your response and wait for the user to reply before proceeding.
Example prompt to the user:
Describe the feature you'd like or the bug you've found in your own words. Don't worry about structure — just tell me what you're thinking and I'll help shape it.
Step 2 — Classify the issue
Using the user's description, determine whether this is a bug report or a feature request:
Language like "broken", "crash", "error", "fails", "not working", "regression", "unexpected behavior", "should have worked" → bug report.
Language like "add support for", "allow", "should be able to", "would be nice", "request", "proposal", "improve", "I wish", "it would be helpful if" → feature request.
If classification is ambiguous, ask the user which type applies before continuing.
Step 3 — Read the appropriate template
Read the template to know which fields to populate:
Using the user's description as source material, populate as many template fields as you can. Apply reasonable inference:
For feature requests: synthesize a clear "What feature do you want added?" statement (noting what's explicitly out of scope if apparent), derive a "Why?" from the use-case (including how users work around the gap today and who the target user is), draft initial Acceptance Criteria (happy path + edge cases) from the described behavior, infer a priority if clues are present, and note any blocking issues for the "Blocked By" field.
For bug reports: extract steps to reproduce, expected vs actual behavior, and any environment details mentioned.
Leave fields blank where the description provides no basis for inference. Do not ask questions yet — draft first.
Step 5 — Generate a title
Draft a concise, descriptive issue title (under 72 characters) that captures the core ask or bug. Prefix with the relevant area if apparent (e.g. [Discover], [Maps], [Alerting]).
Step 6 — Interview the user for weak or missing fields
Review your draft. Identify fields that are:
Empty, or
Vague / not independently verifiable (for Acceptance Criteria), or
Missing required information
For each such field, ask one question at a time, then end your response and wait for the user to reply before moving to the next field.
Guidelines:
For required fields (Describe the bug, Steps to reproduce, Expected behavior, What feature do you want added?, Why?): always ask if missing or weak.
For Acceptance Criteria: if the drafted criteria are vague (e.g. "should work correctly"), ask the user to make them concrete and testable.
For optional fields (screenshots, logs, browser console errors, additional context, Priority): ask once; accept "N/A" or "none" and move on.
If an answer is still vague after one follow-up, ask one more targeted clarifying question, then move on.
Once all fields are addressed, proceed to Step 7.
For feature requests, also probe for these common gaps (even if the field is not empty, ensure the draft addresses them):
Scope boundaries: Is it clear what's not included? If the feature could be interpreted broadly, ask what's explicitly out of scope.
Current workaround: How do users accomplish this today? If the "Why?" doesn't describe the workaround, ask.
Target user: Who would use this — what role or persona? If not stated, ask.
Dependencies: Are there issues, features, or infrastructure changes that must land first? If so, capture them in the "Blocked By" field.
Step 7 — Collect and validate labels
Ask the user for a team label (e.g. Team:Visualizations) and any additional labels (e.g. accessibility, performance). Accept "none" for either. The type label (bug or enhancement) is added automatically.
End your response and wait for the user to reply before proceeding.
Once the user provides labels, validate all of them in parallel against the repository:
