| name | sales-enablement |
| description | Sales methodology, pipeline management, negotiation frameworks, and customer engagement patterns. |
| tier | extended |
| applyTo | **/*sales*,**/*pipeline*,**/*prospect*,**/*deal*,**/*crm*,**/*quota*,**/*commission*,**/*lead* |
Sales Enablement Skill
Sales methodology, pipeline management, negotiation frameworks, and customer engagement patterns.
Core Principle
Selling is structured problem-solving. You diagnose a customer's pain, match it to a solution, and guide the decision. Process beats personality.
Sales Methodologies
MEDDPICC (Enterprise/Complex Sales)
| Letter | Stands For | Question |
|---|
| M | Metrics | What measurable outcome does the buyer need? |
| E | Economic Buyer | Who has budget authority? |
| D | Decision Criteria | What factors drive the decision? |
| D | Decision Process | What are the steps to close? |
| P | Paper Process | What legal/procurement steps are required? |
| I | Implicate Pain | What happens if they do nothing? |
| C | Champion | Who inside the account is actively selling for you? |
| C | Competition | Who else is being evaluated? |
SPIN Selling (Consultative)
| Phase | Question Type | Example |
|---|
| S โ Situation | Understand current state | "How do you currently handle X?" |
| P โ Problem | Surface pain points | "What challenges does that create?" |
| I โ Implication | Expand the pain | "What impact does that have on Y?" |
| N โ Need-Payoff | Let buyer articulate value | "How would solving that help?" |
Challenger Sale
- Teach: Provide insights the buyer didn't know
- Tailor: Customize the message to stakeholder type
- Take control: Guide the buying process, push back constructively
Solution Selling (Simpler Deals)
| Step | Action |
|---|
| 1 | Identify the pain |
| 2 | Qualify the opportunity |
| 3 | Map solution to pain |
| 4 | Demonstrate value |
| 5 | Negotiate and close |
Pipeline Management
Deal Tracker (MEDDPICC)
{
"deal": "Acme Corp - Platform Expansion",
"value": 250000,
"stage": "negotiation",
"close_date": "2026-06-30",
"meddpicc": {
"metrics": { "score": 3, "note": "10% efficiency gain target confirmed" },
"economic_buyer": { "score": 3, "contact": "CFO Jane Smith" },
"decision_criteria": { "score": 2, "note": "Waiting on technical eval results" },
"decision_process"
Pipeline Stages
| Stage | Definition | Exit Criteria |
|---|
| Prospecting | Initial outreach, cold/warm | Meeting confirmed |
| Discovery | Needs assessment, pain qualification | Pain confirmed, budget discussed |
| Proposal | Solution presented, pricing shared | Decision criteria agreed |
| Negotiation | Terms, pricing, legal | Verbal commitment |
| Closed Won | Signed contract | Revenue booked |
| Closed Lost | Deal lost | Loss reason documented |
Pipeline Metrics
| Metric | Formula | Healthy Range |
|---|
| Win Rate | Closed Won / Total Opportunities | 20โ35% (enterprise) |
| Average Deal Size | Total Revenue / Deals Closed | Varies by segment |
| Sales Cycle Length | Avg days from creation to close | Track trend, not absolutes |
| Pipeline Coverage | Pipeline Value / Quota | 3โ4ร for enterprise |
| Stage Conversion | Opportunities advancing / Total in stage | Monitor each stage |
Forecasting Categories
| Category | Definition | Commit Level |
|---|
| Commit | High confidence, expected this period | 90%+ probability |
| Best Case | Could close if things go well | 60โ89% |
| Pipeline | Active but early stage | 10โ59% |
| Upside | Stretch opportunities | <10% |
Prospecting & Outreach
Cold Outreach Framework
Email structure (3-sentence max):
- Relevant observation about their business (shows research)
- One sentence connecting their challenge to your solution
- Low-friction ask (15-minute call, not a demo)
Qualification Framework (BANT)
| Criterion | Question | Disqualifier |
|---|
| B โ Budget | Is there budget allocated? | No budget and no path to budget |
| A โ Authority | Can this person make or influence the decision? | No access to decision maker |
| N โ Need | Is the pain real and urgent? | Nice-to-have, no urgency |
| T โ Timeline | When do they need to decide? | No timeline = no deal |
Negotiation Frameworks
Principled Negotiation (Fisher & Ury)
- Separate people from the problem โ Address emotions, maintain relationships
- Focus on interests, not positions โ Ask why, not just what
- Invent options for mutual gain โ Expand the pie before dividing
- Use objective criteria โ Industry benchmarks, precedents, standards
Common Negotiation Tactics (and Counters)
| Tactic | Description | Counter |
|---|
| Anchoring | Extreme first offer | Re-anchor with data |
| Flinch | Physical reaction to price | Hold steady, stay silent |
| Nibbling | Adding small asks after agreement | "That would require re-opening terms" |
| Good cop/bad cop | Paired pressure | Address the issue, ignore the dynamic |
| Deadline pressure | "Offer expires Friday" | Verify deadline is real |
Discount Discipline
- Never discount without getting something: Shorter term, larger volume, case study, referral
- Discount from value, not from list: Show the full value before any reduction
- Document the justification: Every discount needs a recorded business reason
Customer Success Handoff
Post-Sale Transition
| Step | Owner | Deliverable |
|---|
| 1 | Sales | Handoff document (pain, solution, stakeholders, commitments) |
| 2 | CS/AM | Welcome call within 48 hours |
| 3 | Both | Joint account plan (90-day) |
| 4 | CS/AM | Onboarding kickoff |
Real Estate Sales Patterns
Property Presentation
- CMA (Comparative Market Analysis): 3โ5 comparable recent sales, adjusted for features
- Days on Market (DOM): Track vs market average โ high DOM signals pricing issue
- Absorption Rate: Monthly sales / Available inventory โ measures market speed
Client Communication
- Buyer's journey: Discovery โ Pre-approval โ Viewings โ Offer โ Inspection โ Close
- Seller's journey: Valuation โ Staging โ Listing โ Showings โ Offers โ Negotiation โ Close
- Follow-up cadence: 24h post-showing, 72h if no response, 2-week check-in for nurture
Anti-Patterns
- Pitching features before understanding the problem
- Discounting to win without addressing the real objection
- Forecasting based on hope instead of evidence
- Skipping discovery to rush to demo
- Single-threading (only one contact in the account)
- Not documenting loss reasons (repeats same mistakes)