| name | pm-planning-test-planning |
| description | Test planning specialist. Collaborates with QA and Game Designer to create comprehensive test plans. Defines success criteria and test cases before task assignment. Use proactively before task assignment. |
| user-invocable | true |
| category | planning |
Test Planning
"Well-planned tests catch more bugs with less effort."
Create comprehensive test plans before task assignment. Collaborate with QA and Game Designer to define success criteria, test cases, and validation approaches.
When to Use
Use during the test_planning phase, after task selection but before assignment to worker.
Process
Step 1: Understand Task
Read task details from prd.json:
- Title, description, category
- Acceptance criteria
- Verification steps
- Related tasks/dependencies
Step 2: Coordinate with QA
Request QA input on test approach:
- What test cases are needed?
- What validation approaches? (manual/automated/browser/multiplayer)
- What edge cases should be covered?
Message to QA:
{
"id": "msg-qa-{timestamp}-001",
"from": "pm",
"to": "qa",
"type": "test_plan_request",
"payload": {
"taskId": "{task-id}",
"taskTitle": "{title}",
"category": "{category}",
"acceptanceCriteria": [{criteria}],
"question": "What test cases and validation approach do you recommend?"
}
}
Step 3: Coordinate with Game Designer
Request GD input on success criteria:
- What defines "success" from player perspective?
- Reference games or examples?
- Edge cases to consider?
Message to Game Designer:
{
"id": "msg-gamedesigner-{timestamp}-001",
"from": "pm",
"to": "gamedesigner",
"type": "success_criteria_request",
"payload": {
"taskId": "{task-id}",
"taskTitle": "{title}",
"question": "What are the success criteria for this feature from a player perspective?"
}
}
Step 4: Create Test Plan
Generate a comprehensive test plan including:
- Success criteria (measurable)
- Test cases (specific steps)
- Validation approach (manual/automated/browser/multiplayer)
- Edge cases to cover
Test Plan Template
## Test Plan: {TASK_ID}
### Success Criteria
1. {measurable criteria with specific values}
2. {measurable criteria with specific values}
### Test Cases
| Case | Steps | Expected Result |
|------|-------|-----------------|
| TC1 | {step 1} -> {step 2} -> {step 3} | {expected outcome} |
| TC2 | {step 1} -> {step 2} | {expected outcome} |
### Validation Approach
- **Manual testing:** {what needs manual verification}
- **Automated tests:** {what unit/integration tests}
- **Browser testing:** {what Playwright MCP tests}
- **Multiplayer testing:** {if applicable - server-authoritative checks}
### Edge Cases
- {edge case 1: what happens when...}
- {edge case 2: boundary conditions}
### Reference Examples
- {game/app showing similar functionality}
Output Format
Return to PM:
## Test Plan Ready: {TASK_ID}
### Success Criteria
- {criteria 1}
- {criteria 2}
### Test Cases Summary
- {count} test cases defined
- Testing approach: {manual/automated/browser/multiplayer}
### QA/GD Consultation
- QA input: {summary of QA recommendations}
- GD input: {summary of GD success criteria}
### Attached Test Plan
{full test plan content}
Category-Specific Considerations
Architectural Tasks
- Focus on state management correctness
- Test edge cases in state transitions
- Verify no race conditions
Functional Tasks
- Test core functionality thoroughly
- Verify all acceptance criteria
- Test error conditions
Visual/Shader Tasks
- Visual regression testing
- Performance benchmarks (FPS, draw calls)
- Screenshot verification
Multiplayer Tasks
- Server-authoritative verification
- State synchronization testing
- Network condition simulation
- Anti-cheat validation
Important
- Always consult both QA and Game Designer before finalizing test plan
- Success criteria must be measurable and specific
- Test cases should cover both happy path and edge cases
- Consider the validation approach needed (manual vs automated)
- For visual tasks, include screenshot comparison criteria
- For multiplayer tasks, include server-authoritative checks
See Also
