Build a long-form About page that converts visitors into subscribers and buyers - not a bio expanded into paragraphs, but a full DR asset that hooks with the reader's problem, tells a story-of-discovery, proves the path with results, and closes with an explicit next step. Outputs a structured content brief plus paste-ready section copy.
Use when a website About page exists but reads like a résumé, career history, or humble-brag parade - or when building a new About page from scratch for a personal brand, consultant, coach, or founder.
Not for a bio (use content-bio) and not for a full sales page (use convert-sales-page) - the About page is the trust asset in the awareness layer, not the conversion layer.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
A direct command skips the review prompt. Inspect the source before running it.
Build a long-form About page that converts visitors into subscribers and buyers - not a bio expanded into paragraphs, but a full DR asset that hooks with the reader's problem, tells a story-of-discovery, proves the path with results, and closes with an explicit next step. Outputs a structured content brief plus paste-ready section copy.
Use when a website About page exists but reads like a résumé, career history, or humble-brag parade - or when building a new About page from scratch for a personal brand, consultant, coach, or founder.
Not for a bio (use content-bio) and not for a full sales page (use convert-sales-page) - the About page is the trust asset in the awareness layer, not the conversion layer.
triggers
["write my about page","rewrite my about page","about page copy","my story page","about me page","website about section","personal brand about","founder about page","coach about page","consultant about page"]
negative_triggers
["write my bio","build my speaker kit","write a sales page","write my homepage"]
{"lineage":"The Donahoe Method (Wayland-owned operating system); StoryBrand 'guide not hero' frame (Donald Miller, 2017) inverted into DR sales narrative; DR canon: Gary Halbert (The Boron Letters, 1984), Eugene Schwartz (Breakthrough Advertising, 1966), Joseph Sugarman (AdWeek Copywriting Handbook, 1998); personal brand canon: Justin Welsh, Michael Hyatt (Platform, 2012), Marie Forleo; Sean Donahoe's 28 years of direct-response personal brand operating"}
Content About Page - The DR About-Page Arc
"The About page is the second-most-visited page on most business websites. It is also the page most people write about themselves. That is the mistake. The reader came to find out if you can help them - not to read your career summary." - Sean Donahoe, 28 years direct response
The standard About page fails because the writer centers themselves. It opens with their name, walks through their history, lists their credentials, and closes with a photo caption. The reader - who arrived because they have a problem and are deciding whether to trust you with it - is nowhere in the document.
Direct response inverts this. The About page opens with the reader's problem, tells a story in which the writer experienced the same problem and found a path, proves the path with results, and closes with an explicit next step. The writer is still the subject - but they are in the role of the guide who has already walked the road the reader is about to travel. Every section serves the reader's decision: "Is this person going to be able to help me?"
This skill builds that page.
When to Use
Trigger phrases: "write my about page", "rewrite my about page", "about page copy", "my story page", "website about section", "personal brand about", /content about-page <seller>.
Use when:
A website About page exists but every paragraph begins with "I" and ends with a credential
Someone is building a personal brand site from scratch and needs the trust-anchor page before launch
A consultant, coach, or founder's About page has good story material but no structural DR scaffolding - it reads like memoir, not conversion
The page generates traffic but no subscriber/inquiry conversions despite being well-written prose
Do NOT use for:
A bio (50-400 words) - use content-bio; the About page pulls from the Tier 3 bio as a seed, not a replacement
A homepage hero - that's a different conversion problem; use convert-above-fold
A full long-form sales page - use convert-sales-page; the About page is the trust layer, the sales page is the close layer
Pure brand storytelling without a conversion architecture - everything on the page must have a job
The DR About-Page Arc
Six sections. Every section has one job. No section is decorative.
Section 1 - The Reader's Problem (Hook)
Job: Make the reader feel seen before the page says anything about the writer.
The page opens not with "Hi, I'm [Name]" but with a description of the problem the reader has right now. Not the writer's backstory - the reader's present-state. If this page is for a fractional CFO, the hook describes the feeling of approaching a raise with books that are "technically accurate but not investor-ready." If it's a marketing consultant, the hook describes the feeling of spending money on ads that technically run but don't convert.
The hook is 2-3 short paragraphs max. Its only job is to make the reader say "yes, that's me" before they've read a single credential. This is the Nerve Strike from the Donahoe Method: name the pain with enough specificity that the reader feels understood before they feel sold.
Specifications:
Opens in second person ("You") or present-tense scene-setting
Names the specific problem (not "you're struggling with marketing"; "you have a Facebook ad with 140,000 impressions and 11 sales")
No writer credentials in Section 1 - the reader hasn't earned the right to hear them yet
150-250 words
Section 2 - The Discovery Story (Promise)
Job: Establish the writer as a guide who walked the same road - not an expert who was always above it.
This is the story-of-discovery. The writer had the same problem. They were in the same place. At some point, through specific experience (not inspiration, not "one day I realized") they found the path. The story is specific and time-anchored. It is not "I've always been passionate about finance." It is "It was Q3 2018. I was VP Finance at a SaaS company 60 days from a Series A that was going sideways, and I realized the problem wasn't the product - it was the way we were presenting the unit economics."
This section makes an implicit promise: I found the path. I can show you the path. The reader is not the hero of this story yet - but they can see the path being laid.
The StoryBrand frame (Donald Miller, 2017) positions the writer as "the guide" and the reader as "the hero." The DR inversion: the guide's discovery story is itself a mini-sales letter. It must hook (the moment of failure), show the path (the discovery), and hint at the outcome (the transformation) before the proof section confirms it.
Specifications:
Specific time and situation: month, year, what was happening
Named failure or confusion (not just "I struggled")
Named discovery or mechanism (the specific thing learned, the specific turn)
200-350 words
Section 3 - The Proof (Social Proof and Results)
Job: Confirm that the path works - with evidence specific enough to be credible and varied enough to cover different types of readers.
Proof in the About page is not a wall of logos or a list of company names. It's evidence in three forms:
Result proof - specific numbers, specific outcomes, specific timelines. Not "hundreds of clients" but "14 seed rounds in 36 months."
Story proof - one brief client story (50-100 words) that mirrors the reader's situation. Name the type of client, the starting problem, the result. No names required but no vagueness allowed ("a founder in e-commerce" is fine; "a client" is not).
Authority proof - the credential that earns the right to the claim. This is the only section where job titles, press mentions, and institutional affiliations appear. Keep it short and relevant. One credential that directly supports the promise beats five credentials that prove breadth.
Order: result first, story second, authority third. The reader trusts results more than credentials. Credentials without results read as defensive.
Specifications:
At least one number, one story fragment, one authority reference
300-400 words total for the section
No "leading expert," "thought leader," "passionate about," "world-class"
Section 4 - The Inversion (The New Model)
Job: Articulate the writer's distinct point of view on how the problem is solved - the Fingerprint that makes this guide different from every other guide.
Most About pages skip this section entirely. They go from proof to "here's how to work with me." The skip is a mistake. The reader needs to understand not just that the writer has results, but why the writer's approach works differently from everything the reader has already tried. This is where the contrarian take, the reframe, the "most people do X but I do Y" moment lives.
This section is the Fingerprint from the Donahoe Method embedded into the trust asset. It is brief - 100-150 words - but it is the moment the reader decides the writer is worth their time specifically, not just generically credible.
Examples of what lives here:
"Most financial consultants optimize for compliance. I optimize for story - because the story is what investors fund."
"Most marketers build campaigns. I build conversion architecture. Campaigns run out of money; architecture compounds."
Section 5 - Who This Is (and Isn't) For
Job: Qualify the reader so the right people lean in and the wrong people opt out.
An About page that tries to serve everyone closes no one. Explicitly naming the reader - by situation, not by demographic - does two things: it deepens the connection with the right reader ("that is exactly me"), and it provides implicit social proof ("this person is selective, which means working with them is valuable").
This section names the right reader and, briefly, the wrong reader. The wrong reader is named with respect - not rejection, just redirection. "If you're looking for someone to run your ads for you, I'm not that. If you're looking for someone to build the conversion system your ads run into, we should talk."
Specifications:
Named situation, not named demographic ("a 7-figure founder 6 months from a raise" not "entrepreneurs")
Right reader: 2-3 sentences
Wrong reader: 1-2 sentences (redirect, not rejection)
100-150 words
Section 6 - The Next Step (Close)
Job: Tell the reader exactly what to do and defuse the smallest objection to doing it.
The close is a single, specific action. Not "feel free to reach out." Not "explore my work below." A specific URL, a specific offer, a specific CTA with a defused objection.
The close follows the same pattern as every DR close: state the action, name the outcome of the action, defuse the friction. "Book a 30-minute intro call → you'll leave knowing whether we're a fit and what the first 90 days would look like. No pitch. No homework. Just a conversation." Three sentences. One action. One outcome. One defused objection.
The reader's problem - the specific pain or situation the page visitor is in
The discovery story material - the specific moment/year/situation when the seller found the path (not a career summary; a scene)
Proof points - at least one number, one client story fragment, one credential
The contrarian POV - what does the seller do differently that explains their results?
The close action - what should the reader do next, and what do they get?
Optional:
Existing About page - paste for structural diagnosis before rewriting
Tone guidance - conversational / formal / irreverent (defaults to conversational DR voice)
Target reader description - the right person + the wrong person
out_path - caller-controlled output path
Output Spec
The skill produces:
Section-by-section content brief - what each section needs to accomplish, with the seller's raw inputs mapped to the framework
Full page copy - all six sections written and sequenced, in the seller's voice, with DR structure embedded
CTA block - the close section as a standalone block, ready to be styled separately
Conversion checklist - section-by-section pass/fail against the DR Arc criteria
Worked Example
Seller: Marcus Webb, B2B SaaS founder-turned-consultant. Helps SaaS founders with $1M-$5M ARR fix their conversion architecture (demo → trial → paid) before scaling spend.
Reader's problem: Spending $20K+/month on ads, demo requests are up, conversion from demo to paid is stuck at 8%, and every consultant says "run more ads."
Section 1 (Hook - Reader's Problem):
You have a pipeline problem. Not a traffic problem.
Your ads are running. The demos are booking. Your SDR team is hitting their call targets. And yet the conversion from demo to paid has been 8% - or 7%, or 9% - for the last six months, and you're not sure if the next dollar of ad spend is the answer or just a louder version of the same question.
You've been told the answer is better discovery calls. Or better pricing pages. Or a different sales playbook. Maybe all three. You've tried most of them.
The problem isn't any of those things. The problem is that your conversion architecture - the sequence of experiences between "I'm interested" and "here's my card" - has a hole in it. And more traffic just means more people falling through the same hole faster.
Section 6 (Close):
If any of that sounds familiar, the next step is a 30-minute architecture call.
You'll walk in with your current demo-to-paid conversion rate and the three things you've already tried to fix it. You'll walk out knowing exactly where the hole is and what closing it is worth in annual revenue. No pitch. No proposal. No homework. Just the diagnosis.
→ marcuswebb.com/call - 30 minutes, free, no commitment
Edge Cases and Common Failures
Failure 1 - Centering the writer instead of the reader. The most common About page failure. If Section 1 begins with the writer's name, the page is already wrong. The reader came to find out if you can help them. Make that the first thing on the page.
Failure 2 - Becoming a résumé. An About page that lists every job title from first internship to present in reverse-chronological order is a LinkedIn profile, not a trust asset. The discovery story is NOT a career summary. It is ONE specific moment with specifics - time, place, failure, turn. Everything else is supporting evidence, not the story.
Failure 3 - Proof without specificity. "Working with hundreds of clients over 15 years" is unverifiable and therefore unconvincing. "14 companies prepped for seed rounds in 36 months, one raised at 5x valuation improvement" is specific, falsifiable, and credible. Every proof point needs a number or a named situation.
Failure 4 - Skipping Section 4 (The Inversion). Without the contrarian POV, the page proves competence but not differentiation. The reader knows you're credible; they don't know why your approach is the one to choose over three other credible people. Section 4 is the Fingerprint - skip it and the page is structurally incomplete.
Failure 5 - A soft or absent close. "Feel free to reach out" is not a close. "Explore my work" is not a close. The About page earns trust and then must direct it. State the action, name the outcome, defuse the friction. One CTA, one time, explicitly stated.
DR Fundamentals Mapped
DR Element
Section
Mechanism
Hook
Section 1 - Reader's Problem
Nerve Strike: names the pain with specificity before any credential
Promise
Section 2 - Discovery Story
Guide-as-path: implicit promise that the seller has already found what the reader is looking for
Proof
Section 3 - Results and Authority
Cialdini social proof + authority: result first, story second, credential third
Fingerprint
Section 4 - The Inversion
Donahoe Method Layer 4: the only-this-guide POV that differentiates
Qualification
Section 5 - Who This Is For
Direct-response list hygiene: qualified reader converts; unqualified reader self-exits
Close
Section 6 - Next Step
Single action + outcome + defused objection; no ambiguity
The About Page Rewrite Workflow
When an existing About page is provided, run this diagnostic before rewriting:
Step 1 - Structural scan
Identify which of the six sections exists in the current draft and which is missing:
Section
Present?
Quality
Primary failure mode
Reader's Problem (Hook)
Yes / No
-
Page opens with "Hi, I'm [Name]"
Discovery Story (Promise)
Yes / No
-
Career summary instead of scene
Proof
Yes / No
-
Vague credentials, no numbers
The Inversion (Fingerprint)
Yes / No
-
Missing entirely
Who This Is For
Yes / No
-
Missing or too broad
Next Step (Close)
Yes / No
-
Soft close or no close
Most existing About pages have a partial Section 2 (career history mislabeled as a story) and a partial Section 3 (credential list without result proof). Sections 1, 4, 5, and 6 are usually entirely absent.
Step 2 - Reader centering test
Read the first three paragraphs. Count how many times the word "I" appears vs. the word "you." If the ratio is more than 2:1 in favor of "I," the page is self-centered. The rewrite opens with the reader's problem and earns the right to say "I" through the discovery story.
Step 3 - Specificity pass
Every vague claim in the existing draft gets flagged for replacement:
"Years of experience" → specific years + specific situation
"Hundreds of clients" → specific number + specific context
"Helped businesses grow" → specific result + specific type of business
"Passionate about" → deleted; replaced with evidence of the passion
Step 4 - Close test
Does the existing page end with a specific action? If it ends with "Feel free to reach out," "Explore my work below," or simply stops after the proof section - the close needs to be written from scratch. Pull the close action from the user inputs before writing.
Output Template
# About Page - <SellerName>**Positioning:**<one-linehook>**Target reader:**<situation + outcometheywant>**Close action:**<specificURLorbookinglink>
---
## Section 1 - Reader's Problem<Copy-150-250words, secondpersonorpresent-tensescene, nocredentials>
---
## Section 2 - Discovery Story<Copy-200-350words, specifictime/situation/turn, storynotsummary>
---
## Section 3 - Proof<Copy-300-400words, resultfirst / storysecond / authoritythird>
---
## Section 4 - The Inversion<Copy-100-150words, namedframeorcontrarianPOV, only-this-guidedifferentiation>
---
## Section 5 - Who This Is For<Copy-100-150words, rightreadernamedbysituation / wrongreaderredirected>
---
## Section 6 - Next Step<Copy-75-125words, singleaction / outcomestated / objectiondefused>
---
## Diagnostic checklist- [ ] Section 1 opens with the reader's problem, not the seller's name
- [ ] Section 2 has a specific time, place, and turn - not a career summary
- [ ] Section 3 leads with a number or specific result, not a credential
- [ ] Section 4 contains a named frame or contrarian POV unique to this seller
- [ ] Section 5 names the right reader by situation and the wrong reader with a redirect
- [ ] Section 6 has one CTA, one outcome, one defused objection
- [ ] Reader-centering ratio: "you" appears at least as often as "I" across the full page
Lineage
The Donahoe Method (Wayland-owned operating system) - hook/promise/proof/close as the structural spine; Fingerprint as Section 4
Donald Miller, StoryBrand (2017) - "you are the guide, not the hero" frame, inverted here into DR sales narrative: the guide's own discovery story is the proof of path
Eugene Schwartz, Breakthrough Advertising (1966) - market sophistication: the reader has already heard the generic claims; the About page must show something they haven't seen
Gary Halbert, The Boron Letters (1984) - the reader is always asking "what's in it for me?"; even an About page must answer that question on every page
Michael Hyatt, Platform (2012) - the About page as the trust anchor of the personal brand platform
Joseph Sugarman, AdWeek Copywriting Handbook (1998) - every sentence's purpose is to get the next one read; applied to section-to-section momentum
Marie Forleo - personal brand authenticity and story-as-trust: the discovery story must be true to earn the trust it's designed to generate
Notes
The About page is the trust layer; the sales page is the close layer. The About page should not close the sale - it should earn enough trust that when the reader encounters the close (sales page, intake form, CTA), they are already oriented toward yes.
Section 2 (Discovery Story) is the hardest section to write from inputs. Push for specifics: month, year, what was happening, what was wrong, what was the specific turn. Generic story material produces generic copy; specific story material produces Fingerprint-level differentiation.
For coaches and solopreneurs, Section 5 (Who This Is For) is often emotionally difficult - sellers don't want to exclude anyone. This section is not exclusion; it's precision. The right reader leans in harder when they see themselves named. Write it.
This skill pairs upstream with content-bio (Tier 3 bio seeds the discovery story) and downstream with content-speaker-kit (the About page proof section feeds the speaker one-sheet).
The reader-centering ratio (Step 2 of the rewrite workflow) is a fast mechanical check that catches the most common failure before any structural analysis is needed. Run it first on any existing draft.
For personal brands with multiple audiences (e.g., a consultant who works with both B2B founders and individual executives), Section 5 should name both audiences and direct each to a different next step. The close can have two tracks without breaking the single-action rule: "If you're a [type A], here's your next step. If you're a [type B], here's yours."
