mobile-app-quality-audit

Comprehensive mobile application quality assessment covering performance, UX, accessibility, security, and app store compliance to produce an actionable audit scorecard. Use when the user asks about mobile app quality audit, related techniques, best practices, or needs guidance in this domain. Do NOT use when the request is outside the scope of mobile app quality audit or requires a different specialized skill.

Jump to install

Repository: FerroxLabs/wayland
Last source activity: June 7, 2026 at 16:09
Detected SKILL.md language: English
Stars: 591
Forks: 112

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Back to search Back to installation

Score	Criteria
1	App launch >5s. Frequent ANR/freezes. Scrolling is janky. Memory leaks cause crashes. Battery drain is extreme.
2	Launch 3-5s. Occasional stuttering. Some screens are slow. Memory usage grows over time.
3	Launch 2-3s. Mostly smooth scrolling. Acceptable memory footprint. Battery usage reasonable.
4	Launch <2s. Consistent 60fps. Efficient memory usage. Battery impact minimal. Offline capability for core features.
5	Launch <1s. 120fps on supported devices. Exemplary resource efficiency. Background processing optimized. Predictive preloading.

Score	Criteria
1	Non-standard navigation. Confusing flows. No loading states. Error messages are cryptic. Inconsistent design.
2	Basic navigation. Some UX issues. Inconsistent interaction patterns. Limited feedback for user actions.
3	Standard platform navigation patterns. Consistent design system. Loading and error states handled. Reasonable onboarding.
4	Polished UX. Delightful interactions. Smooth transitions. Contextual help. Gesture support. Platform-idiomatic design.
5	Exceptional UX. Anticipates user needs. Personalized experience. Haptic feedback. Microinteractions. Accessibility as a feature.

Score	Criteria
1	Crash-free rate <95%. Frequent crashes in core flows. No crash reporting. Users lose data on crash.
2	Crash-free rate 95-97%. Known crashes in specific flows. Basic crash reporting. Some data loss on crash.
3	Crash-free rate 97-99%. Crashes are non-critical edge cases. Crash reporting with symbolication. Graceful recovery.
4	Crash-free rate 99-99.5%. Proactive crash monitoring. Auto-recovery from errors. State preservation on crash.
5	Crash-free rate >99.5%. Near-zero crashes. Predictive error prevention. Full state recovery. Automated crash triage.

Score	Criteria
1	No offline support. Crashes without network. Excessive API calls. No caching. Large payloads.
2	Basic error handling for no network. Minimal caching. Redundant API calls. No request optimization.
3	Graceful offline handling. Response caching. Reasonable payload sizes. Request deduplication.
4	Offline-first for key features. Smart caching strategy. Optimized payloads. Request batching. Background sync.
5	Full offline capability. Conflict resolution for sync. Edge caching. Adaptive quality based on connection. Delta syncs.

Score	Criteria
1	No accessibility support. Screen readers cannot navigate. No content descriptions. Touch targets are tiny.
2	Partial accessibility. Some labels present. Screen reader can navigate basics. Insufficient contrast in places.
3	VoiceOver/TalkBack works for main flows. Adequate touch targets. Reasonable contrast. Dynamic type partially supported.
4	Full screen reader support. Dynamic type/font scaling. High contrast mode. Reduced motion support. Comprehensive labels.
5	Exemplary accessibility. Custom accessibility actions. Braille support. Switch control tested. Cognitive accessibility considered. Accessibility testing automated.

Score	Criteria
1	Data stored in plaintext. No certificate pinning. Sensitive data in logs. No obfuscation. Hardcoded secrets.
2	Basic encryption for credentials. No jailbreak detection. Some sensitive data exposure. Minimal network security.
3	Keychain/Keystore for credentials. TLS for all connections. No sensitive data in logs. Basic obfuscation.
4	Certificate pinning. Biometric authentication. Root/jailbreak detection. Encrypted local storage. Runtime protection.
5	Advanced security. Tamper detection. Secure enclave usage. Automated security scanning. Penetration tested. Threat model maintained.

Score	Criteria
1	Multiple guideline violations. App rejected repeatedly. Privacy policy missing. No age rating.
2	Marginal compliance. Occasional review issues. Privacy labels incomplete.
3	Compliant with guidelines. Privacy labels and policy current. Appropriate age rating. In-app purchase rules followed.
4	Proactive compliance. App preview/screenshots optimized. ASO basics covered. All metadata complete and compelling.
5	Exemplary store presence. A+ compliance. Rich preview content. Localized listings. Regular metadata optimization.

Score	Criteria
1	No architecture. Massive view controllers/activities. No tests. Dependency management absent.
2	Some architecture patterns. Minimal tests. High coupling. Outdated dependencies.
3	Clear architecture (MVVM, Clean, etc.). Unit tests for business logic. Dependency injection. CI/CD pipeline.
4	Well-structured codebase. Comprehensive test coverage. Modular architecture. Automated builds and testing.
5	Exemplary code quality. Full test pyramid. Feature flags. Modular for team scaling. Automated quality gates.

Dimension                      Score (1-5)  Weight   Weighted
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
App Performance                [   ]        x 0.20 = [      ]
User Experience Design         [   ]        x 0.15 = [      ]
Stability and Crash Handling   [   ]        x 0.15 = [      ]
Network Efficiency             [   ]        x 0.10 = [      ]
Accessibility                  [   ]        x 0.10 = [      ]
Security                       [   ]        x 0.15 = [      ]
App Store Compliance           [   ]        x 0.10 = [      ]
Code Quality and Maint.        [   ]        x 0.05 = [      ]
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
TOTAL APP QUALITY SCORE                              [      ] / 5.0

Score Range	Quality Level	Interpretation
4.5 - 5.0	Excellent	Top-tier app quality. Focus on delighting users and staying ahead.
3.5 - 4.4	Good	Solid app. Address specific gaps for a best-in-class experience.
2.5 - 3.4	Adequate	Functional but room for improvement. Users may prefer competitor apps.
1.5 - 2.4	Poor	Significant quality issues. Ratings will suffer. Urgent improvements needed.
1.0 - 1.4	Critical	App is nearly unusable. Risk of store removal. Emergency intervention needed.

# Mobile App Quality Audit - [App Name]
**Audit Date**: [Date]
**Audited By**: [Name/Role]
**Platforms**: [iOS / Android / Both]
**App Version**: [Version]
**Technology**: [Native / React Native / Flutter / etc.]

## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentences on overall quality, top issues, and primary recommendation]

## Overall Score: [X.X] / 5.0 - [Quality Level]

## Key Metrics
| Metric | Current | Target | Status |
|--------|---------|--------|--------|
| Crash-free rate | | >99.5% | |
| Cold start time | | <2s | |
| App store rating | | >4.5 | |
| App size | | <50MB | |

## Dimension Scores
[Completed scoring table]

## Top Issues
1. [Issue] - Impact: [description] - Fix: [recommendation]

## Recommended Actions (Priority Order)
1. [Action] - Expected impact: [description] - Effort: [estimate]

## Next Audit Date: [Date - recommend with each major release]

## Mobile App Quality Audit Analysis

### Assessment
[Key findings and observations]

### Recommendations
1. [Primary recommendation]
2. [Secondary recommendation]
3. [Additional suggestions]

### Action Items
- [ ] [First action step]
- [ ] [Second action step]
- [ ] [Follow-up task]