safeguard

name	safeguard
description	Environment profile classification. Classifies a project's deployment environment (Zero/A/B/C) and deployment paradigm (Docker/Non-Docker/Hybrid). Produces a persistent profile consumed by all downstream skills.
disable-model-invocation	false
argument-hint	[project-path]
wrought	{"version":"1.0","tools":{"capabilities":["read_file","search_content","find_files","write_file"]},"platforms":{"claude-code":{"disable-model-invocation":false}},"agent":{"role":"Environment Profiler","expertise":["environment classification","deployment paradigm detection","infrastructure assessment"],"non_goals":["implementing infrastructure changes","modifying deployment configurations"]},"execution":{"default_mode":"react","max_iterations":10,"stop_conditions":["Environment profile written to docs/analysis/",".wrought directory updated","User instructed to stop"]},"output":{"format":"markdown","template":"docs/analysis/{YYYY-MM-DD_HHMM}_{project}_environment_profile.md","required_sections":["Environment Profile","Deployment Paradigm","Evidence","Recommendations"]},"pipeline":{"track":"standalone","standalone":true,"prerequisites":[],"produces":["docs/analysis/*_environment_profile.md",".wrought/profile.json"],"suggested_next":[]}}

/safeguard — Environment Profile Classification

Trigger: /safeguard {mode} where mode is detect, check, or recommend.

Purpose: Classify a target project's deployment environment profile (Zero/A/B/C) and deployment paradigm (Docker/Non-Docker/Hybrid). Produces a persistent profile document consumed by all downstream skills across all three pipelines (reactive, proactive, audit).

Examples:

• /safeguard detect — Full environment profiling from scratch
• /safeguard check — Re-validate an existing profile against current state
• /safeguard recommend — Generate actionable improvement guidance based on profile

---

Pre-flight Check

This skill is standalone — it can be invoked at any time without prerequisites.

If this invocation is part of an active workflow, check docs/findings/*_FINDINGS_TRACKER.md for a relevant tracker and note it for context, but do not enforce stage requirements.

---

Modes

Mode	What It Does	Requires Existing Profile
detect	Full environment profiling: scan codebase, classify profile, write artifacts	No
check	Re-validate existing profile against current codebase state	Yes
recommend	Generate prioritized improvement recommendations	Yes

---

Design Principles

1. Evidence-based: Classification is driven by file scanning + user confirmation, not assumptions. Every indicator is verified against the codebase with ambiguities resolved via interactive checkpoints.

2. Non-blocking: The safeguard profile is optional. All Wrought™ skills work without it. When a profile exists, downstream skills can optionally read it for enrichment — but never require it.

3. Cumulative taxonomy: Profiles are cumulative — Profile Zero is a subset of A, A is a subset of B, B is a subset of C. A project classified as Profile B meets all Profile A requirements plus its own.

4. AI-driven classification: Profile determination requires judgment (e.g., "Is this Docker for the app or just dependencies?", "Is this CI limited or comprehensive?"). Classification logic is in this SKILL.md, not in CLI code.

---

Language Scope

The detection matrix is currently scoped to Python projects:

• SIGTERM handling: signal.signal(signal.SIGTERM, loop.add_signal_handler(signal.SIGTERM
• Long-lived work: Celery, APScheduler, Huey, arq
• Process managers: systemd, supervisord (Python-common)

Language-agnostic indicators (Docker, CI/CD, compose files, pre-commit hooks, health endpoints) work for any language.

Future extension: Detection matrix entries for Node.js (process.on('SIGTERM')), Go (signal.Notify), Java (Runtime.addShutdownHook), Rust (ctrlc crate) can be added as Wrought expands language support. Each language addition is additive — existing Python detection is preserved.

---

Related Skills

/safeguard detect and /analyze discover

Both produce shared artifacts consumed by downstream skills:

• /analyze discover produces system-map.md (system components, dependencies, code metrics)
• /safeguard detect produces docs/analysis/*_environment_profile.md (deployment environment, SDLC maturity)

Relationship:

• /safeguard detect DOES NOT require the System Map (runs independently at onboarding)
• /analyze discover DOES NOT require the environment profile (runs independently)
• If both exist, each can optionally read the other for enrichment (not enforced)
• Recommended order: /safeguard detect first (broader context), then /analyze discover (detailed mapping) — but not enforced

They are independent skills with optional enrichment, not a dependency chain.

---

Mode: Detect

Full environment profiling. Scans the codebase, classifies the deployment environment, and writes profile artifacts.

Step 1: Check for Existing Profile

Glob for docs/analysis/*_environment_profile.md.

IF exists: Read profile. CP1 — Existing Profile: "An existing profile classifies this project as Profile {X} ({paradigm}). What would you like to do?" → Re-classify from scratch | Adjust existing classification | Run check mode instead | Cancel

If "Cancel" or "Run check mode": exit detect or switch to check mode respectively.

ELSE: Proceed to Step 2.

Step 2: Detection Matrix Scan

Scan the codebase for all 12 indicators from the Detection Matrix (see below). For each indicator:

1. Run the specified detection method (Glob or Grep)
2. Record what was found (files, patterns, locations)
3. Record what was NOT found (absence is evidence too)

Compile results into a summary table.

Step 3: CP2 — Clarify Ambiguities

Present scan results. Ask context-specific questions for ambiguities (Docker for app vs dependencies, CI scope, inactive configs, environment count).

Step 4: Classification Logic

Apply the Classification Logic (see below) to determine:

• Profile level: Zero, A, B, or C
• Deployment paradigm: Docker, Non-Docker, or Hybrid

Use the evidence from Step 2 and clarifications from Step 3.

Step 5: CP3 — Confirm Classification

CP3: "Based on the evidence, I'd classify this as Profile {X} ({paradigm}). Justification: {brief}. Is this correct?" → Yes, accurate | Profile should be higher | Profile should be lower | Paradigm is wrong

If the user disagrees, adjust and note the override reason.

Step 6: Write Profile Document

Write the profile document to docs/analysis/{YYYY-MM-DD_HHMM}_environment_profile.md using the Profile Document Template (see below).

Include:

• Classification Summary table (all 12 indicators with evidence)
• Profile Justification (why this profile, what was ambiguous)
• Gap Analysis (requirements vs current state)
• Manual Override section (M3)
• Recommended Deployment Safety Pattern
• Next Steps

Step 7: Write .wrought Safeguard Fields

Update the .wrought marker file with safeguard fields:

safeguard_version=1
safeguard_profile={Zero|A|B|C}
safeguard_paradigm={docker|non-docker|hybrid}
safeguard_last_run={ISO-8601 timestamp}
safeguard_created={ISO-8601 timestamp}
safeguard_override=none

Read the existing .wrought file, preserve all non-safeguard fields, and write back with updated safeguard fields.

Step 8: CP4 — Route Gaps (Optional)

If gaps were identified in Step 6:

CP4: "I found {N} gaps against Profile {X} requirements. Most significant: {top gap}. Route to /finding?" → Yes, log as findings | Note in profile only | No — I'm aware

If "Yes": Directly invoke /finding with gap descriptions from Step 6. This is a user-approved in-skill action. After /finding completes, return to Step 9.

Step 9: Handoff Summary + STOP

Print the classification summary:

Profile classified: Profile {X} ({paradigm})
Profile document: docs/analysis/{YYYY-MM-DD_HHMM}_environment_profile.md
.wrought marker: updated with safeguard fields

Summary:
- {Key finding 1}
- {Key finding 2}
- {Key finding 3}

{If gaps were routed to /finding: "Gaps logged as findings in tracker: {path}"}
{If gaps noted but not logged: "{N} gaps noted in profile document. To formally track them: /finding {brief gap summary}"}
{If no gaps: "No gaps detected against Profile {X} requirements"}

STOP. Do NOT proceed beyond this skill. Await further instructions from the user.

---

Mode: Check

Re-validate an existing profile against the current codebase state. Detects drift since the last classification.

Step 1: Read Existing Profile

Glob for docs/analysis/*_environment_profile.md.

IF not found: Print error message and STOP.

"No existing environment profile found. Run /safeguard detect first to create one."

ELSE: Read the profile document and the .wrought marker.

Step 2: Re-scan Detection Matrix

Run the same 12-indicator scan from the Detection Matrix. Record current state for each indicator.

Step 3: Compare Current vs Recorded State

Compare each indicator's current state against the recorded state in the profile document's Classification Summary table. Flag any changes:

• New indicators detected (e.g., CI/CD added since last classification)
• Indicators removed (e.g., Docker removed)
• Indicators changed (e.g., new environments added)

Step 4: Report Changes or Confirm

IF no changes detected:

"Profile still valid. Profile {X} ({paradigm}) confirmed. No drift detected."

IF changes detected:

CP5: "Changes detected: {changes}. Impact: {assessment}." → Update profile to {Y} | Keep current profile | Run full detect

Step 5: Update .wrought Timestamp

Update safeguard_last_run in the .wrought marker to the current ISO-8601 timestamp. All other fields remain unchanged unless the profile was updated.

STOP. Await further instructions.

---

Mode: Recommend

Generate actionable improvement recommendations based on the existing profile.

Step 1: Read Existing Profile

Glob for docs/analysis/*_environment_profile.md.

IF not found: Print error message and STOP.

"No existing environment profile found. Run /safeguard detect first to create one."

ELSE: Read the profile document.

Step 2: Generate Recommendations by Profile Level

Based on the detected profile and its gap analysis, generate prioritized recommendations:

• Profile Zero: Focus on adding basic deployment safety (SIGTERM handling, pre-commit hooks, environment separation)
• Profile A: Focus on adding test environment, CI/CD basics, deployment scripts with safety gates
• Profile B: Focus on strengthening CI/CD, adding rollback mechanisms, monitoring
• Profile C: Focus on audit trails, compliance automation, advanced deployment patterns

Step 3: Write Recommendations Artifact

Write recommendations to docs/analysis/{YYYY-MM-DD_HHMM}_safeguard_recommendations.md using the Recommendations Template (see below).

Step 4: Handoff Summary + STOP

Recommendations generated: docs/analysis/{YYYY-MM-DD_HHMM}_safeguard_recommendations.md
Based on: Profile {X} ({paradigm})

Top priorities:
1. {Immediate recommendation}
2. {Short-term recommendation}
3. {Strategic recommendation}

STOP. Await further instructions.

---

Detection Matrix

12 indicators, Python-scoped per Language Scope section.

#	Indicator	Detection Method	What It Tells Us
1	Docker presence	Glob: Dockerfile, docker-compose*.yml, .dockerignore	Docker vs non-Docker paradigm
2	Environment count	Glob: multiple compose files (.dev.yml, .prod.yml, .rc.yml), deployment scripts with env flags, separate config dirs	Profile Zero (1) vs A (2) vs B (3+)
3	CI/CD presence	Glob: .github/workflows/, Jenkinsfile, .gitlab-ci.yml, .circleci/, bitbucket-pipelines.yml	Profile C indicator
4	Pre-commit hooks	Glob: .pre-commit-config.yaml	Profile Zero safety gate
5	SIGTERM handling	Grep (Python): signal.signal(signal.SIGTERM, loop.add_signal_handler(signal.SIGTERM	Universal prerequisite (all profiles)
6	Grace period config	Grep: stop_grace_period (compose), TimeoutStopSec (systemd), stopwaitsecs (supervisord)	Profile A+ requirement
7	Process manager	Glob: systemd unit files (*.service), supervisord conf, Procfile	Non-Docker deployment mechanism
8	Deployment scripts	Glob/Grep: shell scripts with docker compose, deploy, promote in name or content	Existing deployment infrastructure
9	Long-lived work (Python)	Grep: Celery, APScheduler, Huey, arq imports; infinite loop patterns	Determines if graceful shutdown matters
10	Health endpoints	Grep: /health, /healthz, /api/health, readiness probes	Existing monitoring infrastructure

Edge Cases

• A docker-compose.yml running only PostgreSQL/Redis is Docker for dependencies, not Docker for the app — use AskUserQuestion to clarify the distinction
• A .github/workflows/ci.yml running only linting is limited CI, not full CI/CD — note the distinction in the classification
• A Procfile or deployment script that hasn't been used in months — ask if it's actively used before counting it as evidence

---

Classification Logic

Profile Zero — DEV-Only

• No Docker for the application (may use Docker for dependencies)
• Single environment (no promotion pipeline)
• No deployment scripts targeting remote environments
• Development-stage project

Profile A — Minimal SDLC (DEV + PROD)

• Two environments (local + deployed, or DEV + PROD)
• Docker or process manager for deployment
• No dedicated TEST/UAT environment
• Limited or no CI/CD

Profile B — Typical SDLC (DEV + TEST + PROD)

• Three or more environments
• CI/CD pipeline exists (may not be comprehensive)
• Deployment scripts with some safety gates
• Test environment for validation before production

Profile C — Strong SDLC

• Full CI/CD with required checks
• Branch protection and approval workflows
• Multiple environments with promotion gates
• Audit trails, signed releases, or automated rollback

Cumulative rule: Each profile includes all requirements of the profile below it. A Profile B project meets all Profile A requirements plus its own.

Paradigm Determination

• Docker: Application itself runs in containers (not just dependencies)
• Non-Docker: Application runs via process manager, systemd, or direct execution
• Hybrid: Application uses containers for some components and direct execution for others

---

Output: Profile Document Template

Path: docs/analysis/{YYYY-MM-DD_HHMM}_environment_profile.md

Sections (in order):

1. Header: Title, date, classified by, profile, paradigm, Wrought version
2. Classification Summary: Table with all 12 indicators (Dimension | Detected | Evidence)
3. Profile Justification: Why this profile, what was ambiguous, how resolved
4. Gap Analysis: Table (Requirement | Required By | Current State | Gap? | Recommendation) covering SIGTERM, grace period, pre-commit, in-flight work, health endpoints, graceful shutdown, CI/CD, audit trail, rollback, approval workflows
5. Manual Override: Override field (safeguard_override=none|Zero|A|B|C in .wrought), reason, date. Instructions for overriding.
6. Recommended Deployment Safety Pattern: Profile + paradigm specific pattern references
7. Next Steps: If gaps exist, suggest /finding to formally track them. If healthy, confirm status. If near next profile threshold, suggest upgrade path.

---

Output: Recommendations Template

Path: docs/analysis/{YYYY-MM-DD_HHMM}_safeguard_recommendations.md

Sections (in order):

1. Header: Title, date, generated by, based on profile, profile document path
2. Priority Recommendations: Immediate (this week), Short-term (this sprint), Strategic (this quarter)
3. Profile-Specific Guidance: Detailed recommendations based on profile level
4. Gap Closure Plan: For each gap — what to implement, where, how, and verification

---

Flags

No flags defined. Future: --force (skip interactive checkpoints).

---

After Classification

STOP. Do NOT proceed beyond this skill's scope. After any mode completes, print the handoff summary and wait for user instructions. Do NOT automatically run other skills or start implementations — EXCEPT when the user explicitly approves gap routing to /finding in Step 8 (detect mode), which is a user-gated in-skill action.

Suggest next steps based on context:

• If gaps were found and routed to /finding: "Run /investigate F{N} to begin resolving the highest-severity gap"
• If gaps were found but NOT routed: "Run /finding {gap summary} to formally track and resolve the gaps"
• If no gaps were found: "Run /analyze discover for detailed system mapping, or /safeguard recommend for improvement guidance"

---

Integration: Profile-Aware Enhancement Pattern

Downstream skills that want to leverage the environment profile:

1. Glob for docs/analysis/*_environment_profile.md
2. If found: read Classification Summary, extract Profile level and Paradigm
3. Append a "Profile-Aware Recommendations" section at the END of output
4. If not found: skip entirely — all skills work without it

Profile awareness is always additive and optional.