| name | terminology-consistency-check |
| description | Check terminology consistency across sections. / 跨章节术语一致性检查。 |
| metadata | {"builtin_skill_version":"0.1.0","copaw":{"emoji":"📎","requires":{}}} |
terminology-consistency-check
Purpose / 目标
Detect inconsistent term usage and propose a canonical vocabulary set for editorial consistency.
识别术语使用不一致问题,并提供统一术语建议集。
When to use / 何时使用
- "Check term consistency across this document."
- "帮我统一全文术语。"
- "Find inconsistent naming before final review."
Inputs / 输入
- text_or_sections: required
- domain_glossary: optional, preferred terms
- strictness: optional, low or medium or high
Output / 输出
- term_clusters: same-concept term groups
- canonical_candidates: recommended preferred forms
- replacement_plan: conservative replacement suggestions
Boundaries / 边界
- Do not force replacement for direct quotes.
- Preserve brand names and legal names unless instructed.
- If confidence is low, mark as review-required.
Execution Guidance / 执行指引
- Extract candidate terms and aliases.
- Cluster terms by semantic equivalence.
- Rank canonical options by clarity and frequency.
- Output replacements and exceptions.
Example I/O / 示例输入输出
Input example:
- task: "Apply this skill to the provided text block"
- constraints: "Keep original intent and only apply necessary changes"
输入示例:
- 任务:"对给定文本应用本技能"
- 约束:"保持原意,仅做必要修改"
Output example:
- result: concise, structured outcome
- highlights: key findings and priority actions
- follow_up: unresolved items for human review
输出示例:
- 结果:结构化且简洁的处理结果
- 重点:关键发现与优先处理项
- 后续:需人工确认的未决事项
Prompt Contract / 提示约定
- Keep recommendations conservative and traceable.
- Separate confirmed findings from uncertain assumptions.
- Preserve original intent unless explicit rewrite is requested.
- If confidence is low, provide options and mark review-required items.