Skip to main content

public-docs

Create and maintain public, user-facing product documentation for this repo's `packages/docs` app. Use when asked to write, revise, or review docs pages (tutorial/concept/reference/troubleshooting), improve docs information architecture, fix docs frontmatter/linking issues, or align docs quality with Vercel/Sentry-style standards.

Source facts

Repository
getsentry/junior
Last source activity
July 13, 2026 at 15:58
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
367
Forks
40

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

File Explorer
6 files

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
public-docs
description
Create and maintain public, user-facing product documentation for this repo's `packages/docs` app. Use when asked to write, revise, or review docs pages (tutorial/concept/reference/troubleshooting), improve docs information architecture, fix docs frontmatter/linking issues, or align docs quality with Vercel/Sentry-style standards.
# Public Docs Use this workflow to produce docs that are crisp, task-oriented, and trustworthy for external users. Load only the references needed for the request: | Task | Read | |------|------| | Understand docs app layout and constraints | `references/api-surface.md` | | Draft or revise common docs pages | `references/common-use-cases.md` | | Diagnose docs quality/build failures | `references/troubleshooting-workarounds.md` | ## Core invariants 1. Keep docs audience-facing: explain user outcomes, not internal implementation chatter. 2. Match the local docs contract in `packages/docs/src/content/docs/contribute/documentation-guidelines.md`. 3. For new or substantially edited pages, require frontmatter fields: `type`, `summary`, `prerequisites`, `related`. 4. Include concrete verification steps for tutorial/troubleshooting content. 5. End each page with an explicit "next step" path through internal links. 6. Prefer minimal runnable examples over long conceptual exposition. 7. Keep prose present around lists; avoid heading-plus-bullets-only sections. ## Workflow ### 1. Classify the request Select one primary path: - New page authoring - Existing page refactor/clarification - Information architecture update (sidebar/redirects/navigation) - Docs quality pass (accuracy, scannability, consistency) - Troubleshooting/build-fix for docs app ### 2. Gather local context 1. Read `packages/docs/src/content/docs/contribute/documentation-guidelines.md`. 2. Read neighboring docs in the same section (`start-here`, `concepts`, `extend`, `operate`, `reference`, `contribute`). 3. If navigation is involved, read `packages/docs/astro.config.mjs` (`sidebar` and `redirects`). 4. If public interfaces are involved, verify the exported TypeScript surface and its code comments directly. ### 3. Author or edit with the right page shape 1. Pick doc `type` (`conceptual`, `tutorial`, `reference`, `troubleshooting`) from intent. 2. Follow depth and section guidance from documentation guidelines. 3. Keep wording direct and plain; remove filler or internal-only caveats. 4. Use titled code fences for file snippets. 5. Prefer internal links that advance the reader to the next concrete action. ### 4. Validate changes Run the narrowest meaningful checks: ```bash pnpm docs:check ``` When structure, sidebar, or redirects change, also run: ```bash pnpm docs:build ``` ### 5. Report completion Return: 1. Changed files and what each change improves for readers 2. Validation commands executed and outcome 3. Residual risks (for example, missing screenshots, unverified env-specific setup)
View on GitHub