| name | content-pillars |
| description | Define 3-5 content pillars and a topic taxonomy that translates brand positioning into repeatable content categories the agent can generate against every week without running out of ideas. |
| version | 2.0.0 |
| author | Crewm8 |
| maintainer | Gokul (github.com/gokulb20) |
| license | MIT |
| homepage | https://crewm8.ai |
| tags | ["social","strategy","content-pillars","taxonomy","planning","repetition"] |
| related_skills | ["positioning-statement","brand-voice-system","content-calendar","hook-write"] |
| inputs_required | ["positioning-statement","audience-research-or-customer-insights"] |
| deliverables | ["content-pillar-document-with-topic-bank"] |
| compatible_agents | ["hermes","claude-code","droid","cursor","windsurf","openai","openclaw","generic"] |
| execution_tier | 2 |
| required_tools | ["FIRECRAWL_API_KEY"] |
| required_env_vars | ["FIRECRAWL_API_KEY"] |
Content Pillars
Transform brand positioning into 3-5 repeatable content categories (pillars). Each pillar is a lens through which the brand talks about the world. The topic taxonomy underneath ensures the agent never runs out of specific, on-brand ideas.
Purpose
Without pillars, content is random. With pillars, every post has a job: educate, persuade, prove, humanize, or convert. Pillars make the content calendar fillable without creativity blocks, and they make the brand's feed feel cohesive instead of scattershot.
When to Use
- After positioning is locked, before the first calendar
- Content feels repetitive or scattered
- Quarterly strategy refresh
- Expanding to a new platform
- Founder says "I don't know what to post about"
Inputs Required
- Positioning statement (from
positioning-statement skill)
- Brand voice guide (from
brand-voice-system skill)
- Customer interview insights or audience pain points
- Competitor content audit (what's working for them)
- Platform strategy (which platforms are active)
Quick Reference
| Pillar Type | Purpose | Example Topics | Best Formats |
|---|
| Education / How-to | Teach something valuable | Frameworks, step-by-step guides, mistakes to avoid | Threads, carousels, how-to videos |
| Point of View / Contrarian | Share a differentiated opinion | Hot takes, industry myths, "unpopular opinion" | Short posts, quote tweets, opinion threads |
| Proof / Social Proof | Show the thing works | Case studies, results, revenue updates, customer stories | Metric-led posts, testimonial graphics |
| Behind the Scenes / Build-in-Public | Humanize the brand | Team culture, process, failures, lessons learned, "how it's going" | Photo + caption, process videos, raw updates |
| CTA / Conversion | Drive action | Product launches, demo requests, waitlists, newsletter signups | Launch posts, demo clips, link posts |
Procedure
-
Start with the positioning statement. For each potential pillar, ask: "Does content in this pillar reinforce the brand's core message?" If the answer is "not really," that pillar doesn't belong.
-
Define 3-5 pillars. Each pillar gets:
- A name (1-3 words)
- A one-sentence description of what content in this pillar does
- A target split (% of weekly output)
- 10-15 specific topic ideas (not templates โ actual topics that could be posts)
- The target emotional response: do we want the reader to think, feel, or act?
-
Map each pillar to the right formats:
- Education: threads, carousels, how-to videos, LinkedIn carousels
- POV: short takes, quote tweets, contrarian threads, LinkedIn opinion posts
- Proof: case study posts, metric screenshots, testimonial graphics, revenue update threads
- BTS: photo + caption, process videos, unfiltered updates, TikTok POV content
- CTA: launch announcements, link posts, demo clips, waitlist pages
-
Map each pillar to the right platforms:
- Education dominates LinkedIn and X
- POV lives primarily on X (and occasionally LinkedIn)
- BTS thrives on IG Stories and TikTok
- Proof works everywhere but lands differently (metrics on X, stories on LinkedIn)
- CTA works where the audience already trusts you โ earn it with other pillars first
-
Define the pillar mix (recommended starting point, adjust per data):
- Education: 35% of weekly output
- POV: 25%
- Proof: 20%
- BTS: 15%
- CTA: 5% (you earn the right to ask)
-
Build a 15-topic bank per pillar. Topics should be specific, not generic. Bad: "SaaS tips." Good: "Why charging monthly killed our growth (and what we switched to)."
-
Set pillar health check rules:
- Any pillar exceeding 50% of weekly output? Rebalance.
- Any pillar with zero posts this week? Fill it.
- Any pillar consistently underperforming (below average ER for 3+ weeks)? Diagnose or retire.
Output Format
# [Brand] Content Pillars โ [Date]
## Pillar 1: [Name]
**Goal:** [What this content achieves for the audience and the brand]
**Target split:** [X]% of weekly output
**Best formats:** [List 2-3]
**Platform priority:** [Platform A > Platform B > ...]
**Emotional target:** [Think / Feel / Act]
### Topic Bank (15 ideas)
1. [Specific, actionable topic]
2. [Specific, actionable topic]
...15
## Pillar 2: [Name]
...
## Pillar Mix Target
| Pillar | % of Weekly | X | LinkedIn | IG | TikTok |
|--------|------------|---|---|-----|--------|
| Education | 35% | Threads | Carousels | Carousels | How-tos |
| POV | 25% | Short posts | Opinion posts | โ | Reaction videos |
| Proof | 20% | Metric posts | Case studies | Testimonials | โ |
| BTS | 15% | Photo posts | โ | Stories | POV clips |
| CTA | 5% | Launch posts | Demos | โ | โ |
## Pillar Health Check (Review Monthly)
- Which pillar drives the most engagement?
- Which pillar drives the most conversions?
- Which pillar is underrepresented or overperforming?
- Is any pillar below average ER for 3+ weeks? Diagnose.
Done Criteria
The skill is complete when:
- 3-5 pillars are defined with names, goals, and target splits
- Each pillar has 10-15 specific topic ideas (not generic categories)
- Each pillar is mapped to formats and platforms
- The pillar mix totals 100% and is actionable
- The health check rules are documented
Pitfalls
- More than 5 pillars dilutes everything โ the audience can't tell what you stand for
- Pillars that are too broad ("Business Advice") are useless as a filter
- Same pillar mix on every platform (X is not LinkedIn is not TikTok)
- CTA content without scaffolding from other pillars (you can't ask before you give)
- Topic banks that run dry in 2 weeks (aim for 15 topics per pillar โ that's 3 months of material before repeating)
Verification
Map the last 2 weeks of posts to pillars. If more than 20% don't fit any pillar, the taxonomy is wrong. If one pillar exceeds 50% of output, rebalance. Can you look at the topic bank and immediately write a post from any topic? If a topic makes you think "I have nothing to say about this," it's not specific enough.
Example
Input: SaaS analytics tool positioning = "Product analytics for B2B founders who hate dashboards."
Output:
- Pillar 1 (Education): "Product analytics that actually matter" โ topics: 3 metrics that predict churn, why DAU is a vanity metric, how to set up your first retention cohort
- Pillar 2 (POV): "Unpopular analytics takes" โ topics: why dashboard tools make worse decisions, the metric VCs care about that you're ignoring
- Pillar 3 (Proof): "Customer results" โ topics: how [customer] reduced churn 40%, revenue impact of fixing onboarding drop-off
- Pillar 4 (BTS): "Building an analytics company" โ topics: why we rebuilt our data pipeline, the feature customers begged for that we said no to
- Pillar 5 (CTA): "Try it" โ topics: free trial launch, comparison vs. competitors, feature deep-dives