- name
- mantis-calibrate
- description
- Calculates the final risk score based on empirical evidence and architectural impact. Use when findings have been fully processed by previous stages and you need to append final risk scores to the finding files. Don't use for discovering new vulnerabilities or writing patches.
# Risk Calibrator (/mantis-calibrate)
## System Goal
Risk Analysis Expert. Evaluates confirmed findings against a rigorous risk
matrix, taking into account successful reproduction and production viability to
produce a final risk score (1-10).
## Command Definition
- **Command:** `/mantis-calibrate`
- **Description:** Calibrates the risk level of findings based on evidence and
impact.
## Input/Output Contract
- **Reads**:
- `workspace/findings/*.json` (all finding files to load full pipeline state).
- `workspace/kb/THREAT_MODEL.md` (if exists, to check threat boundary
overrides and asset criticality).
- `workspace/.mantis_state.json` (to track the current loop pass, and to read
`active_snapshot` — `{snapshot_id, snapshot_pinned, root}` — for finding
provenance and history stamping; absent ⇒ degraded/today's behavior).
- **Writes**:
- Updates finding files in-place with scoring/calibration fields
(`impact_score`, `likelihood_score`, `availability_tier`,
`inferred_exposure`, `attacker_position`, `mantis_risk_score`, `priority`,
`sanity_triage_applied` (may begin with `STALE_EVIDENCE` when the
STALE-EVIDENCE guard suppresses heuristics), `calibration_checklist`
(entries may carry `STALE_EVIDENCE:` reasons), `outrage_commentary`,
`executive_summary`). Appends a `history` entry with `snapshot` provenance
(see history JSON template in the body).
- Reusable helper script `workspace/helpers/append_calibrate.py`.
- **Preconditions**:
- Confirmed or raw findings must exist in `workspace/findings/`.
- **Idempotency Guarantee**:
- Updates findings in place by overwriting existing keys with the calculated
score. Running multiple times on the same inputs yields identical outputs,
with no duplicated entries.
## Instructions
Convert the raw security findings and their empirical results (repro/patch) into
a prioritized, actionable risk report.
Execute the calibration as follows:
**Locator resolution (findings-only).** Calibrate never needs to read target
source to compute a score, but some heuristics below may re-inspect code;
resolve the code root the same way every stage does. **Block A** is inlined
below:
```
LOCATOR RESOLUTION (before reading ANY target code or artifact):
0. ROLE: If this skill NEVER reads target source (report, calibrate, reflect),
you are a FINDINGS-ONLY stage: skip steps 2-6; still read active_snapshot from
state for provenance/annotation; NEVER stop merely because a code root is unset.
1. Determine CODE_ROOT, in this priority order:
a. If --target_root is passed on THIS invocation, CODE_ROOT = --target_root.
It is AUTHORITATIVE and OVERRIDES SNAPSHOT_ROOT and the state fallback
(used when a caller hands you a prepared tree, e.g. a patched shadow).
b. Else if --snapshot_root (or SNAPSHOT_ROOT) is passed, use it.
c. Else read state_root/workspace/.mantis_state.json (state_root from
--state_root if passed, else ./workspace/... relative to the current dir)
-> active_snapshot.root / .snapshot_id / .snapshot_pinned.
d. Else (no arg AND no readable active_snapshot): CODE_ROOT = current directory,
treat snapshot_pinned = false (MODE-OFF). Do NOT stop.
2. SENTINEL CHECK (only if snapshot_pinned is true AND you did NOT take path 1a):
verify CODE_ROOT/.mantis_snapshot_id exists and equals SNAPSHOT_ID. If missing
or different -> STOP "snapshot sentinel mismatch". (A --target_root tree (1a) is
deliberately mutated and is sentinel-EXEMPT.)
3. PATH FIELDS:
- SNAPSHOT-RELATIVE (read under CODE_ROOT): code_paths entries; plan target_files
that are file paths. Strip ONLY a trailing ":<digits>". A code_paths entry
containing "://" is a URL/endpoint, NOT a file read. A code_paths entry that is
NOT of the form <existing-path>:<integer> is a non-source LOCATOR
(symbol/offset/endpoint): only check that the artifact/symbol exists; skip ALL
line-range and line-existence logic.
- STATE-RELATIVE (read/write under state_root/workspace, NEVER prefix CODE_ROOT):
kb_references, repro_file_path, reattack_file_path, helper scripts, report
files, and all state/findings JSON.
4. Never WRITE under CODE_ROOT when snapshot_pinned is true. Any command that
compiles, generates, or writes artifacts MUST run in a PRIVATE SHADOW copy
(mktemp -d from CODE_ROOT), never with cwd=CODE_ROOT. Read-only inspection may
cd into CODE_ROOT.
5. VCS-METADATA CARVE-OUT: history-log extraction and any VCS diff/blame command
run in the LIVE repository root (which still has .git/.hg/.repo), NOT CODE_ROOT
(the snapshot copy strips VCS metadata). Do NOT stop merely because CODE_ROOT
lacks .git/.hg/.repo.
6. Every shell command uses ABSOLUTE paths and sets its own working directory on
that call. Do NOT assume the working directory persists between calls.
```
> [!NOTE] **CURRENT-PASS CHECK (defensive; the binding guarantee is on the
> harness per `mantis-pipeline-adapter` Scenario 2):** if `active_snapshot` is
> present AND `active_snapshot.pass != state.pass_number`, treat the snapshot as
> STALE for this pass — STOP "stale active_snapshot: pass mismatch" or degrade
> as HALT (`snapshot_pinned` effectively false: no authoritative verdicts, Block
> B NOT_MATCHED, reproduce `not_attempted`). This catches a custom harness that
> preserved `active_snapshot` across the Stage 15 pass increment without
> re-pinning. The reference meta-agent re-pins every pass, so this check never
> fires there. Block B itself cannot detect this (it is `snapshot_id`-only, not
> `pass`-aware).
**Snapshot provenance & STALE-EVIDENCE guard (mechanical; do this before
scoring):**
P0. Read `active_snapshot` (`{snapshot_id, snapshot_pinned, root}`) from
`state_root/workspace/.mantis_state.json` (Block A step 0/1c). NEVER stop if it
is absent — calibrate is a FINDINGS-ONLY stage (Block A step 0).
P1. MODE (single decision for the whole run — branches on `active_snapshot`
presence, 3-state model): - `active_snapshot` is ABSENT in state (no `--sync`
was requested — MODE-OFF = today's default) -> MODE = MODE-OFF. Score **exactly
as today**: run every heuristic as written, do NOT compute PROVENANCE, do NOT
emit `STALE_EVIDENCE`, and do NOT emit any HALT/PINNED banners.
(Backward-compatible default path — byte-for-byte today's behavior.) -
`active_snapshot` IS present AND `snapshot_pinned` is not exactly `true` (HALT
mode — the tree raced or could not be pinned) -> MODE = HALT. `SNAPSHOT_ID` =
`active_snapshot.snapshot_id` (a `live:` id). Compute PROVENANCE per P2 below
and fire the STALE-EVIDENCE guard conservatively (same as PINNED for guard
purposes), because findings' locators may be stale. Authoritative verdicts
(VERIFIED_SECURE, failed_to_reproduce, DUPLICATE, FALSE_POSITIVE, NON_VIABLE)
are forbidden this pass. - `snapshot_pinned` == `true` -> MODE = PINNED.
`SNAPSHOT_ID` = `active_snapshot.snapshot_id`. Full provenance + STALE-EVIDENCE
guard as below.
P2. In MODE = PINNED or HALT, compute PROVENANCE per finding F using Block B's
compare rule: - `F.discovery_commit` missing OR empty OR the literal `"MIXED"`
-> NOT_MATCHED. - `F.discovery_commit` != `SNAPSHOT_ID` (exact string compare,
no fuzzy) -> NOT_MATCHED. - `F.discovery_commit` == `SNAPSHOT_ID` -> MATCHED.
P3. A per-finding heuristic is **STALE** for F when MODE is PINNED OR HALT AND
either: - PROVENANCE(F) == NOT_MATCHED, OR - the finding's `code_paths` target
file does NOT exist under CODE_ROOT. (Resolve CODE_ROOT via Block A steps 1 & 3;
strip a trailing `:<digits>`; read ONLY the pinned root, NEVER the live tree. If
you cannot resolve CODE_ROOT at all, treat the file as absent -> STALE.)
P4. When a heuristic is STALE for F, do NOT apply it; keep the **conservative**
(pre-adjustment) score; and ensure the literal token `STALE_EVIDENCE` is the
FIRST token of `sanity_triage_applied` (add it once, before any UNKNOWN warnings
and any fired-rule list). The four guarded heuristics and their exact STALE
handling are: - **Dead-code 0.2 multiplier** (Section 2, "Asset Criticality &
Reachability"): do NOT apply the 0.2 reduction; use the multiplier you would
otherwise have. - **`repro_failure`** (Section 3 rule): do NOT force-LOW; set
`calibration_checklist.repro_failure.outcome = "UNKNOWN"`, `reason` beginning
`"STALE_EVIDENCE: "`. - **`vague_code_paths`** (Section 3 rule): do NOT
force-LOW; set `calibration_checklist.vague_code_paths.outcome = "UNKNOWN"`,
`reason` beginning `"STALE_EVIDENCE: "`. - **`static_confirmation` trace-lift**
(Section 3 rule, its "valid external stack trace/sanitizer…" exception): do NOT
apply the trace-lift; KEEP the static HIGH cap in force (`likelihood_score` \<=
3, 0.8 Hazard multiplier, NOT CRITICAL). Set
`calibration_checklist.static_confirmation.outcome = "APPLIES"`, `reason`
beginning
`"STALE_EVIDENCE: trace-lift suppressed; trace/crash-log may predate the active snapshot; "`.
P5. NON-SOURCE finding: if the finding's `code_paths` entry is a non-source
LOCATOR (contains `"://"`, or is not of the form `<path>:<integer>` — per Block
A step 3: a symbol / offset / endpoint), SKIP all source-only heuristics for it
— dead-code, file-path/imports/caller-hierarchy exposure inference,
`vague_code_paths`, and static trace re-inspection — and score from the
finding's DECLARED metadata (`attacker_position`, `privileges_required`,
`production_viability`, `repro_status`, threat model). A non-source skip is NOT
flagged `STALE_EVIDENCE` (it is normal, not drift). Non-source findings default
`inferred_exposure` to `"INTERNAL"` (0.8) unless the finding/threat-model
declares otherwise.
1. **Load Full Pipeline State:**
- Read all JSON files from the `workspace/findings/` directory. Because the
pipeline appends data to each finding file at each stage, these files
provide the complete picture of each finding's journey (including its `id`,
reproduction status, and production viability).
- **Missing Fields Fallbacks:** If any finding is missing viability, or
reproduction fields (such as chained findings), apply the following
fallback defaults before scoring:
- If `production_viability` is missing, treat it as `"CONDITIONAL_VIABLE"`.
- If `repro_status` is missing, treat it as `"not_attempted"`.
- **Snapshot provenance (only when MODE is PINNED or HALT):** for each
finding, compute PROVENANCE (MATCHED / NOT_MATCHED) per preamble step P2
and record it in scratch. This value gates the STALE-EVIDENCE handling in
Sections 2 and 3 (preamble steps P3–P4). In MODE == MODE-OFF, skip this —
score as today.
- Read `workspace/kb/THREAT_MODEL.md` from the Knowledge Base (if it exists)
to evaluate component exposure, trust boundaries, asset criticality, and
any custom **Calibration Overrides** (e.g., specific threat positions or
caps that should be lifted or customized for the project).
- **Batch Processing:** If there are more than a few findings to calibrate,
split the task into batches (a few findings at a time). If you have the
ability to invoke subagents, delegate each batch to a subagent to process
in parallel, then aggregate the results. **Each batch/subagent inspects
ONLY the pinned snapshot:** pass `--snapshot_root=<active_snapshot.root>`,
`--snapshot_id=<active_snapshot.snapshot_id>`, and
`--state_root=<workspace parent>` so every subagent resolves the same
CODE_ROOT via Block A. Any code inspection a batch performs (exposure
inference, dead-code, static-trace verification) MUST read through that
CODE_ROOT (the pinned copy), NEVER the live tree, and MUST honor the
STALE-EVIDENCE guard (preamble P3–P4). Findings-only fields (score,
priority, history stamp) are computed from the finding JSON regardless.
2. **Calculate Risk Score (1-10):** For each unique finding file, calculate the
actual technical risk score in a matrix form based on the following formula
components, where **Hazard = Impact + Likelihood**:
- **Impact (1-5):** Evaluate impact using the CIA triad (Confidentiality,
Integrity, Availability) while strictly considering **Blast Radius**.
- 5: Complete, systemic loss of Confidentiality (full data breach, leak of
root cryptographic/HSM master keys) or Integrity (system compromise,
e.g., clear Remote Code Execution (RCE) by an unprivileged attacker who
isn't already in an effective position to execute code). MUST NOT be used
for attackers who already have execution privileges.
- 4: Substantial loss in one or more areas. This includes systemic
Availability loss (total outage of a major service) or major data
exposure.
- 3: Moderate loss (e.g., partial data exposure, temporary or partial
system disruption).
- 2: Minor loss (e.g., minor information leak, localized disruption). A
vulnerability whose blast radius is limited to affecting *only a single
user's own data* MUST NOT be scored higher than 2. *Exception:* If the
action lacks non-repudiation (allowing the user to plausibly deny the
action to commit fraud or blame others), or triggers side-effects
affecting other users/system stability, it should not be downgraded.
- 1: Negligible impact on CIA, mostly a cosmetic issue. Findings of the
type "the code is fragile", "lack of defense-in-depth", or purely
theoretical hygiene issues MUST have an Impact score of 1, ensuring they
are rated LOW at most.
- **Security Control Bypass (Upgrading):** If the vulnerability directly
bypasses a core security control (e.g., authentication, authorization,
cryptographic signature verification) or defeats the primary security
purpose of a library (e.g., a library meant to secure keysets allows
attacker control), elevate the Impact score to at least **4** (or **5**
if it leads to systemic compromise), even if the immediate technical
impact seems localized.
- *Note on Privileges Required & Lateral Movement:*
- If the finding requires **HIGH** privileges (e.g., administrative
privileges, admin-to-super-admin escalation) or only allows lateral
movement/pivoting between internal components from an already
compromised state, cap its individual Impact score at **2**, unless the
exploit results in escaping the container boundary (to the host node)
or cross-tenant escalation.
- If the finding requires **LOW** privileges (e.g., standard
authenticated user), cap its individual Impact score at **3** (unless
it leads to systemic compromise of other tenants/users, OR it directly
bypasses a core security control/library purpose, in which case it can
be higher).
- These caps apply to *individual* findings. If successfully chained into
an Exploit Chain (Super Finding) by the chainer, the chain itself
should be evaluated based on the privilege level required for the
*entry point* (initial step) of the chain.
- **Likelihood (1-5):** Evaluate the probability of occurrence based on
proven exploitability rather than theoretical difficulty.
- 5: Actively exploited in the wild, OR the agent successfully generated a
functional, weaponized exploit (not just a unit test).
- 4: Public Proof of Concept (PoC) exists, OR the agent generated a highly
plausible but partially weaponized exploit.
- 3: No functional exploit, but the attack vector is trivial to automate.
- 2: Theoretical and highly complex (requires local access, strict timing).
- 1: Strictly theoretical risk with no known exploit path.
- **Reachability-in-Practice Modifier:** After determining the base
likelihood, reduce the `likelihood_score` by **1 or 2** (but not below
1.0) if the exploit path relies on uncommon or non-default usage
patterns. This applies if:
- The specific tainted parameter is populated from attacker input only
during rare API calls, uncommon configuration fields, or in data
formats rarely processed in the wild.
- The vulnerability requires non-standard or administrative-only
configurations that are rarely enabled in practice.
- **Context Multiplier (0.1 - 1.0):**
- If `status` is **FALSE_POSITIVE** or **NEEDS_RESEARCH**, or if
`production_viability` is **NON_VIABLE**: Drop this finding completely.
Do not score it or update its file with calibration data.
- If `production_viability` is **VIABLE**, **CONDITIONAL_VIABLE**, or
**SAMPLE_OR_TEST**:
- **Network/Trust Exposure:**
- If the finding resides inside an **Exposed Interface / Trust
Boundary** (directly accessible to untrusted inputs): 1.0.
- If it resides in an **Internal Component** accepting semi-trusted
parsed data: 0.8.
- If deeply nested inside a **Privileged/Trusted Zone**: 0.5.
- **Inference when Threat Model is Missing/Incomplete:** If
`workspace/kb/THREAT_MODEL.md` does not exist or does not mention the
component:
- Analyze the file path, imports, and caller hierarchy to infer
exposure (e.g., public APIs vs internal helpers). **Read only the
pinned CODE_ROOT (Block A), never the live tree. NON-SOURCE
(preamble P5): skip this file-path/imports/caller analysis for
non-source LOCATOR findings — default `inferred_exposure` to
`"INTERNAL"` (0.8) unless the finding or threat model declares
otherwise.** When MODE is PINNED or HALT and the finding is
NOT_MATCHED or its `code_paths` file is absent under CODE_ROOT, do
NOT lower the exposure multiplier below the declared/default value
on the basis of live re-inspection (keep the conservative, higher
multiplier).
- Default the Exposure Multiplier to **0.8** (Internal) and
`inferred_exposure` to `"INTERNAL"` unless there is clear evidence
of direct external exposure (EXPOSED) or deep nested isolation
(PRIVILEGED). Local SUID/LPE binaries should default to
`"INTERNAL"` exposure.
- If the finding description, history, or critic reasoning suggests
the component is "rarely exposed", "internal only", or "unlikely to
be attacker-reachable", reduce the Exposure Multiplier to **0.5**
or lower.
- **Map Exposure and Attacker Position Metadata:**
- Resolve **`inferred_exposure`** based on the Network/Trust Exposure
multiplier:
- Multiplier 1.0 (Exposed Interface) -> `"EXPOSED"`
View on GitHub