Use when running Codex CLI code review for uncommitted changes, a PR branch, or a specific commit, especially for second-model review or merge-readiness closeout.
HashimTheArab/agent-workflows
SkillsMP has collected 19 skills from HashimTheArab/agent-workflows. Open a skill to review its source and details.
- Latest recorded source activity
- SkillsMP catalog refreshed
- skills collected
- 19
- GitHub stars
- 4
- GitHub forks
- 2
Skills in this repository
Showing 19 of 19 collected skills.
Diagnose what's overloading a hot or sluggish Mac. Checks load average against core count, ranks top CPU/memory consumers, and walks process trees to find runaway agent sessions (leftover AI coding-assistant sessions are a common cause). Use when a Mac's fans…
Use when creating, replacing, refining, or shipping a product logo, brand mark, wordmark, favicon, application icon, or identity system across a real product.
Use only when the user explicitly requests adversarial, hostile, end-to-end, or release-gate QA beyond the project's normal verification suite.
Use when a technical decision depends on current official documentation, upstream source, standards, release notes, or comparative best-practice evidence.
Use when a requested change is genuinely ambiguous about its goal, boundaries, acceptance criteria, or irreversible tradeoffs; skip when repository context supports a safe, reasonable interpretation.
Use when the user requests code review, an explicit execution workflow requires independent review, or a substantial change needs a merge-readiness assessment.
Use when the user asks to analyze, investigate, explain why something happens, or provide a grounded cross-file explanation without modifying code.
Use only when the user explicitly asks to remove AI slop, simplify generated code, clean up unnecessary abstractions, or perform a behavior-preserving maintainability pass.
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Use only when the user explicitly requests agent-driven execution of an accepted plan whose tasks can be delegated independently in the current session.
Use when encountering a bug, unexpected test failure, or unexplained behavior before proposing fixes; do not use for an intentional TDD RED failure that fails for the expected missing behavior.
Use when implementing testable behavior or fixing a bug, before writing production code; skip documentation, metadata-only changes, generated artifacts, and configuration with no executable behavior.
Use only when the user explicitly requests an isolated worktree or a selected execution workflow requires isolation from the current workspace.
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
Use only when the user explicitly requests a written implementation plan or selects a plan-driven execution workflow for substantial multi-step work.
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment