| name | openspec-update-change |
| description | Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code. |
| allowed-tools | Bash(openspec:*) |
| license | MIT |
| compatibility | Requires openspec CLI. |
| metadata | {"author":"openspec","version":"1.0","generatedBy":"1.9.0"} |
Revise a change's existing planning artifacts and keep them coherent. Never edit code.
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
/openspec-continue-change is an optional workflow and may not be installed. Before suggesting it anywhere below, verify that it is available. If it is unavailable, openspec status --change "<name>" --json shows the next artifact and openspec instructions "<artifact-id>" --change "<name>" --json explains how to create it.
Steps
-
Select the change
If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
- Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
- Auto-select if only one active change exists
- If ambiguous, run
openspec list --json to get available changes sorted by most recently modified, and ask the user to select one
When prompting, present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:
- Change name
- Schema (from
schema field if present, otherwise "spec-driven")
- Status (e.g., "0/5 tasks", "complete", "no tasks")
- How recently it was modified (from
lastModified field)
Mark the most recently modified change as "(Recommended)" since it's likely what the user wants to update.
Always announce: "Using change: " and how to override (e.g., /openspec-update-change <other>).
-
Get the change's artifacts
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
Parse the JSON to understand current state. The response includes:
schemaName: The workflow schema being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
artifacts: Array of artifacts with their status ("done", "skipped", "ready", "blocked")
isPlanningComplete: Boolean indicating if all planning artifacts are complete. Older CLI versions expose the same value as isComplete.
planningHome, changeRoot, artifactPaths, and actionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
The artifact ids and paths come from the active schema - do NOT assume them, and do NOT branch on hardcoded artifact names. Custom schemas must work unchanged.
The files to edit are artifactPaths.<id>.existingOutputPaths - the concrete files that exist on disk, already glob-expanded for glob artifacts (e.g. specs/**/*.md). Do NOT write to resolvedOutputPath: for a glob artifact it is still the glob pattern, not a real file.
-
Understand the request
- If the user asked for a specific revision ("the design now uses X"), that is the starting edit.
- If they only said "update" / "make this coherent", treat it as a coherence review: read the existing artifacts and check them against each other for contradictions, gaps, and duplication.
Output
After each invocation, show:
- Which artifacts were revised (and which proposed revisions were rejected)
- Anything deferred to
/openspec-continue-change (not-yet-created artifacts or files)
- Where the change stands and the recommended next command
Guardrails
- Planning artifacts only - NEVER edit implementation code. If the revised plan implies code changes, stop and point to
/openspec-apply-change.
- Use the artifact ids and paths reported by
openspec status; never branch on hardcoded artifact names.
- Edit only the concrete files in
existingOutputPaths; never write to a glob resolvedOutputPath.
- Do not advance the build frontier: no new artifacts, no new files under glob artifacts - that is
/openspec-continue-change's job.
- Confirm every edit with the user before writing.
- If the request changes the change's intent rather than refining it, first verify whether the optional
/openspec-new-change workflow is available. If it is, recommend starting fresh with /openspec-new-change (the "Update vs. Start Fresh" heuristic). If it is unavailable, ask for a distinct unused change name and recommend openspec new change "<new-change-name>" instead.