Skip to main content

harness-optimization-loop

Use when improving an agent harness, prompt, workflow, tool order, retrieval strategy, subagent routing, or evaluation loop where multiple candidate approaches can be compared against observable results.

Jump to install

Source facts

Repository
hideaway007/codex-self-improvement-skills
Last source activity
April 29, 2026 at 06:10
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
0
Forks
0

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

File Explorer
2 files

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
harness-optimization-loop
description
Use when improving an agent harness, prompt, workflow, tool order, retrieval strategy, subagent routing, or evaluation loop where multiple candidate approaches can be compared against observable results.
# Harness Optimization Loop ## Overview Improve the system around the model, not the model weights: prompts, tool order, context selection, verification gates, routing, memory use, and workflow shape. Optimize only when there is an evaluation surface. ## When to Use Use this skill: - A prompt, workflow, or tool sequence repeatedly underperforms. - A task needs a more reliable agent harness before scaling or reuse. - There is a benchmark, fixture set, CI check, golden output, human rubric, or repeatable manual test. - The user asks to optimize an agent workflow, prompt, harness, evaluator, or multi-agent process. Do not use it when there is no way to compare candidates, when a single obvious bug fix is available, or when the change would create broad platform complexity for a narrow one-off task. ## Workflow 1. Define the target behavior. - What should improve? - What must not regress? - What evidence will decide between candidates? 2. Capture the baseline. - Save the current prompt, workflow, config, or instructions. - Run the existing evaluation or reproduce the failure. - Record the result and the exact command or manual check. 3. Isolate variables. - Change one dimension per candidate when possible. - Separate bug fixes from prompt wording changes. - Separate retrieval/context changes from tool-routing changes. 4. Generate small candidates. - Prefer 2-4 candidates. - Keep each candidate cheap to test and easy to revert. - Avoid adding new abstractions unless the evaluation demands them. 5. Evaluate and compare. - Use the same inputs and scoring method for every candidate. - Record pass/fail, score, cost, latency, and notable failure modes when available. - Prefer evidence over intuition. 6. Select, integrate, and verify. - Keep the best candidate or combine only independently validated changes. - Run the project's normal verification gate. - Archive enough notes for the next iteration. ## Candidate Log Template ```text Goal: Baseline: Evaluation: Candidate A: - Change: - Result: - Failure mode: Candidate B: - Change: - Result: - Failure mode: Decision: Follow-up: ``` ## What Counts As Harness - System or developer instructions. - Prompt templates and examples. - Retrieval, memory, and context selection. - Tool choice and call order. - Subagent routing and review loops. - Verification gates and scoring scripts. - File-system trace layout for future iterations. ## Common Mistakes - Optimizing without a metric or repeatable check. - Changing prompt, tool order, and evaluator at the same time. - Keeping a candidate because it feels cleaner while the score regresses. - Summarizing historical traces so aggressively that debugging evidence is lost. - Treating this as model training. This skill changes the harness only.
View on GitHub