Skip to main content

codexkit-repo-onboarding

Rapidly map a new codebase, identify the runtime model, risk zones, and first high-value next steps.

Source facts

Repository
hoavdc/CodexKit
Last source activity
March 22, 2026 at 17:03
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
26
Forks
12

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

File Explorer
5 files

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
codexkit-repo-onboarding
description
Rapidly map a new codebase, identify the runtime model, risk zones, and first high-value next steps.
version
1.0.0
category
runbook
# Repo Onboarding Use this skill when entering an unfamiliar repository and you need a dependable first-pass map before making changes. ## Objectives - identify the main runtime and package manager - locate the actual app entrypoints instead of guessing - surface tests, linting, build, and deployment hooks - call out fragile areas, generated code, and secret-handling risk ## Workflow 1. Read the top-level manifest, README, and directory structure. 2. Find the real execution path from entrypoint to key modules. 3. Identify quality gates: lint, type-check, tests, e2e, build. 4. Summarize the codebase in a compact architecture note. 5. Propose the safest next step for the current task. ## Deliverable Produce a short onboarding brief with: - stack summary - critical directories - commands worth running - likely risk zones - open questions that truly block execution ## Avoid - rewriting architecture docs before the repo is understood - assuming the largest folder is the main app - recommending broad refactors during onboarding ## Quality Criteria - [ ] Steps are executable in sequence without external context - [ ] Decision points have clear if/then branching - [ ] Rollback or abort procedures are documented for risky steps - [ ] Expected duration or time-per-step is estimated ## Verification (4C) | Check | Question | |-------|----------| | **Correctness** | Do the steps execute correctly in the order specified? | | **Completeness** | Are decision points, error handling, and escalation paths all documented? | | **Context-fit** | Could someone with the right access but no prior context complete this runbook? | | **Consequence** | If Step N fails and the operator skips to Step N+1, what breaks? | ## Edge Cases - **Steps require access the operator doesn't have** — Document exact access requirements upfront. Include escalation contact for emergency access. - **Environment differs from documented state** — Add a pre-flight check as Step 0 to verify prerequisites before starting. - **Runbook is triggered during off-hours** — Document who to contact and which steps can be safely deferred to business hours. ## Changelog - v1.0.0 — Initial release
View on GitHub