| name | money-learn |
| description | Manage project learnings โ small, atomic, validated patterns that the agent should remember across all skills and sessions. Different from /money-save (which captures full session state); learnings are individual insights that get auto-loaded into every other money-* skill's context. Use when the user has just discovered something worth remembering โ a customer pattern, a pricing insight, a channel that works, a failure mode. Triggered by: 'remember this', 'log a learning', 'this is a pattern', 'show learnings', 'what have we learned', '่ฎฐไฝ่ฟไธช', 'ๅญๅ
ฅ็ป้ช', 'ๆฅ็็ป้ชๅบ'. |
/money-learn โ Project Learnings Manager
Your job is to maintain a project's learnings.jsonl โ a JSONL file of validated patterns that other skills auto-load when they run. Each learning is one row, atomic, citable, and worth remembering across all future sessions.
Learnings are NOT snapshots. A snapshot captures full session state. A learning is a single, durable insight that should influence future thinking even when no specific snapshot is being restored.
Why this exists separately from /money-save
| /money-save | /money-learn |
|---|
| Granularity | Full session state | One pattern per row |
| Frequency | After a major decision | Whenever a pattern is observed |
| Auto-loaded? | Only when /money-restore is called | Yes โ every money-* skill loads recent learnings |
| Mutability | Append-only snapshots | Add, search, prune, supersede |
| Use case | "Resume from this state" | "Remember this pattern always" |
A founder discovers things like:
- "Cold email open rates are 4x higher when the subject is a specific revenue number, not a benefit promise."
- "Our ICP doesn't read X/Twitter โ they live in Reddit r/SaaS."
- "Pricing at $39 converts 30% better than $29 even though it's higher."
- "Customers who upgrade past the $99 tier always cite the team-seat feature."
These are atomic patterns. Each gets one row in learnings.jsonl. They're auto-injected into every future /money-discover, /money-strategy, /money-content, etc., so the agent stops re-suggesting things you've already invalidated.
Triggers
| Command | Behavior |
|---|
/money-learn | Show recent 5 learnings for current project |
/money-learn add | Interactive: extract a learning from current conversation |
/money-learn add "<one-line pattern>" | Add a learning with explicit text |
/money-learn search <query> | Search learnings by keyword/topic |
/money-learn list | List all learnings for current project |
/money-learn list <project> | List learnings for another project |
/money-learn prune | Interactive: review old/contradicted learnings, mark as superseded or remove |
/money-learn export | Output all learnings as a markdown table |
/money-learn promote <L-id> | Promote a project-local learning to the portfolio layer (see below) |
/money-learn portfolio | Show portfolio-wide learnings shared across every project |
/money-learn portfolio search <query> | Search portfolio-wide learnings |
/money-learn portfolio demote <L-id> | Move a portfolio learning back to a single project (if it turned out to be context-specific) |
Natural-language equivalents:
- "Remember this", "Log this learning", "This is a pattern worth keeping"
- "What have we learned", "Show learnings", "Show me the learnings"
- "่ฎฐไฝ่ฟไธช", "ๅญๅ
ฅ็ป้ช", "่ฟๆฏไธไธชๆจกๅผ", "ๆฅ็็ป้ชๅบ"
Schema
Each line in ~/.smtm/projects/{slug}/learnings.jsonl is one JSON object with this fixed schema:
{
"id": "L-{4 hex chars}",
"captured_at": "ISO 8601 with timezone",
"from_skill": "name of the skill that generated this learning, or 'manual'",
"category": "one of: pricing | channel | icp | positioning | conversion | retention | ops | tech | competition | personal",
"pattern": "One sentence stating the pattern. Imperative or declarative; no hedging.",
"evidence": "Concrete evidence supporting the pattern. Specific numbers, dates, quotes preferred.",
"confidence": "validated | emerging | hypothesis",
"supersedes": "id of an older learning this replaces (or null)",
"tags": ["arbitrary", "free-form", "tags"]
}
Confidence levels
- validated โ At least 2 independent observations or 1 quantitative result with N>30. Acts on this freely.
- emerging โ One strong observation, not yet replicated. Other skills consider it but don't lock in.
- hypothesis โ Pattern noticed once, untested. Surfaced for awareness only.
Categories (closed list)
pricing, channel, icp, positioning, conversion, retention, ops, tech, competition, personal
If a learning doesn't fit any category, force a fit โ usually it's personal (about the founder) or ops. Avoid creating new categories; the closed list keeps the auto-load logic predictable.
Workflow
/money-learn add (interactive mode)
Walk through a 5-step extraction:
- What pattern? โ One sentence. If the user gives a paragraph, paraphrase to one declarative sentence.
- What's the evidence? โ Specific. "5 customers said X" not "customers say X". If evidence is vague, reduce confidence to
hypothesis.
- What category? โ Pick from the closed list.
- Confidence? โ Default to
emerging unless evidence is Nโฅ30 or 2+ independent observations.
- Does this supersede an older learning? โ Search for similar patterns, ask the user.
Then write the JSON line to disk and confirm. Print the row that was added.
Auto-extraction from conversation
If the user invokes /money-learn without arguments and there's a clear pattern in the recent conversation (e.g., they just said "wow, the $39 price converts way better than $29"), auto-propose the extraction:
I noticed a pattern in this conversation. Want to log:
- Pattern: "Pricing at $39 converts 30% better than $29 in our ICP"
- Evidence: "{quoted observation from conversation}"
- Category: pricing
- Confidence: emerging (one A/B observation; would be
validated after replication)
Save? [y/n/edit]
/money-learn search <query>
Grep the JSONL for pattern + tags + evidence containing the query (case-insensitive). Return up to 10 matches sorted by:
- Confidence (validated > emerging > hypothesis)
- Recency (newer first)
/money-learn prune (interactive)
For each learning older than 90 days OR marked hypothesis:
- Show the learning
- Ask: still valid? superseded by something newer? delete entirely?
This is how the library stays signal-dense.
Portfolio learnings (cross-project sharing)
A solo operator running multiple products discovers patterns that apply across all of them โ not just to one. Examples:
- "$39 converts better than $29" probably only applies to one product's ICP. Project-local.
- "Cold email subject lines that name a specific revenue number outperform benefit-based subjects 4:1" applies to every cold-outreach campaign. Portfolio-wide.
- "Stripe webhook idempotency keys MUST be checked even when the underlying API call is idempotent" applies to every Stripe integration. Portfolio-wide.
The portfolio layer captures the second kind. Stored at ~/.smtm/portfolio/learnings.jsonl (the same schema as project-local), it auto-loads into EVERY money-* skill in EVERY project, before the project-local learnings are loaded.
Promotion criteria
A project-local learning should be promoted to the portfolio when ALL of:
- Validated confidence โ emerging or hypothesis don't qualify
- Replicated โ observed in at least 2 different projects (or the founder believes it would apply to any future project of the same shape)
- Domain-general โ describes a tactic, channel, tool behavior, or operator pattern; NOT a specific ICP, price point, or product-specific finding
Run /money-learn promote <L-id> to move a project learning to the portfolio. The skill confirms by re-reading the learning aloud, asks if it really generalizes, and writes to the portfolio file. The original project learning stays in place with a promoted_to_portfolio: true flag โ so a future audit can trace where it originated.
Load order
When a money-* skill starts up, learnings are merged in this order (later sources override earlier ones for the same pattern):
- Atom corpus (read-only, ships with the package)
- Portfolio learnings (
~/.smtm/portfolio/learnings.jsonl)
- Project learnings (
~/.smtm/projects/{slug}/learnings.jsonl)
A project-specific finding always trumps a portfolio finding for that project โ but the portfolio pattern is loaded for context. The agent surfaces both, marking the source:
๐ Loaded 6 relevant patterns (4 portfolio, 2 project-local). Notably:
- L-port-3a8f (portfolio, validated, channel): "Subject lines with specific revenue numbers outperform benefit-based 4:1 across cold-email campaigns"
- L-a7k2 (project, validated, pricing): "$39 converts 30% better than $29 in our ICP"
Demotion
If a learning turns out to be context-specific after all (e.g., the portfolio learning fails to replicate in a new project), demote it:
/money-learn portfolio demote L-port-3a8f --back-to <project-slug>
This moves the row back to a project-local file and removes it from portfolio auto-loading. The provenance is preserved โ the row keeps a was_portfolio: true flag.
When NOT to promote
Resist promoting learnings that feel general but aren't:
- Pricing observations: almost always ICP-specific
- "Channel X works" โ works for what offer? Resist generalization
- Tool preferences: founder's taste, not portfolio truth
- One-off wins: a single replication does not equal portfolio-grade
Rule of thumb: if you're about to start a new product, would the learning legitimately apply on day 1? If yes โ promote. If you'd want to re-validate first โ leave project-local.
Auto-loading into other skills
Every other money-* skill that does substantive work should load recent learnings before generating output. The standard pattern (added to those skills' preambles):
## Auto-loaded learnings
Before producing output, read `~/.smtm/projects/{slug}/learnings.jsonl` and surface any
relevant rows by category. Match priority:
- For /money-discover: icp, positioning, channel, competition
- For /money-strategy: pricing, icp, channel, positioning, competition
- For /money-content: positioning, conversion, channel
- For /money-product: tech, ops, conversion
- For /money-diagnose: ALL categories (the diagnosis may surface anything)
- For /money-panel and the four reviewer skills: ALL categories
- For /money-ads: channel, conversion, pricing
- For /money-outreach: channel, icp, positioning, conversion
Filter to confidence โฅ emerging by default. Show the user which learnings influenced the output, so they can spot if any are stale.
The skills should not silently override learnings โ they surface them in a small preamble:
๐ Loaded 4 relevant learnings from this project's history. Notably:
- L-a7k2 (validated, pricing): $39 converts 30% better than $29 in our ICP
- L-9b14 (emerging, channel): Reddit r/SaaS converts 3x better than X for cold outreach
These will inform the analysis below.
Output structures
/money-learn (default โ show recent)
# Recent learnings โ {project}
{N learnings shown of {total} total}
| ID | Captured | Confidence | Category | Pattern |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L-a7k2 | 2026-04-22 | validated | pricing | $39 converts 30% better than $29 in our ICP |
| ... | | | | |
Use `/money-learn search <query>` to filter, `/money-learn add` to capture a new one, or `/money-learn prune` to clean up stale ones.
/money-learn add (after capture)
โ
Learning captured.
ID: L-{hex}
Pattern: {pattern}
Evidence: {evidence}
Category: {category}
Confidence: {confidence}
File: ~/.smtm/projects/{slug}/learnings.jsonl
This will now influence future runs of /money-discover, /money-strategy, /money-content, etc.
Edge cases
- Conflicting learnings โ Two patterns may directly contradict (e.g., "X channel works great" and "X channel is dead"). Don't auto-merge. Use
supersedes field. The newer one wins; the older one is shown only on /money-learn list --include-superseded.
- JSONL corruption โ One bad line shouldn't break the whole file. On read errors, log the bad line and continue.
- No project slug โ If running outside a project directory, fall back to
default project.
- Empty file โ Show: "No learnings yet for
{project}. Add the first one with /money-learn add."
Principles
- Atomic, not narrative โ Each learning is one row, one sentence. If it spans multiple paragraphs, it should be split.
- Evidence over opinion โ Patterns without evidence are guesses, mark as
hypothesis.
- Closed category list โ Don't invent categories. Force-fit to the existing 10.
- Supersede, don't overwrite โ Old learnings may be wrong now but the supersession itself is signal.
- Library hygiene matters โ A 1,000-row learnings file with 30% noise is worse than a 200-row library with 95% signal.
Value Quantification (Required at End of Output)
After /money-learn add (capturing one learning):
- ๐ Captured โ 1 {category} learning at {confidence} confidence
- โฑ Saves you each future skill run โ ~30 seconds of re-explaining a pattern + permanent prevention of skill suggesting something you already ruled out
- โ ๏ธ Risk avoided โ The agent has no memory across sessions without learnings โ it will re-suggest the wrong pricing, wrong channel, wrong ICP unless told otherwise
- ๐ Auto-loaded by โ All major money-* skills on next invocation (filtered by relevant category)
After /money-learn (showing recent) or /money-learn search (querying):
- ๐ Surfaced โ {N} matching learnings from {total} total
- โฑ Time saved โ ~5-15 minutes of digging through old conversation transcripts
- โ
What you got โ The exact validated patterns relevant to your current question, with evidence citations