Use when answers, progress updates, explanations, or questions risk verbosity, repetition, indirect wording, vague conclusions, or conversational loops.
ihabkhaled/AI-Psychiatry
SkillsMP has collected 79 skills from ihabkhaled/AI-Psychiatry. Open a skill to review its source and details.
- Latest recorded source activity
- SkillsMP catalog refreshed
- skills collected
- 79
- GitHub stars
- 3
- GitHub forks
- 0
Skills in this repository
Showing 40 of 79 collected skills.
Use when the user explicitly requests the complete AI-Psychiatry framework through one all-in-one command that evaluates and orchestrates every available skill until the task is proven complete.
Use when the user explicitly requests the complete AI-Psychiatry framework through one all-in-one command that evaluates and orchestrates every available skill until the task is proven complete.
Use when the user explicitly requests maximum autonomous execution, no unnecessary questions, persistent recovery, independent decision-making, and continuous work until the full Definition of Done is proven.
Use when installing, upgrading, or auditing AI Psychiatry; adding attention, compulsive-checking, overthinking, underthinking, semantic anti-bypass, recursion, evidence, context, memory, or delivery controls to a repository.
Use when the user explicitly requests maximum autonomous execution, no unnecessary questions, persistent recovery, independent decision-making, and continuous work until the full Definition of Done is proven.
Use when commands, labels, agents, counters, or classifications change while the same underlying behavior continues.
Use when BLOCKED is proposed after difficulty, uncertainty, unfamiliar code, a slow operation, or a small number of failed attempts.
Use when DONE is proposed with unrun tests, missing requirements, inferred success, happy-path-only proof, or unresolved required findings.
Use when context is overloaded or compression may have removed requirements, constraints, evidence, blockers, or decisions.
Use when an important implementation, architecture, security, data, or delivery decision rests on unresolved critical unknowns.
Use when mandatory behavior, integration, security, migration, or data requirements lack the appropriate kind of proof.
Use when an AI-Psychiatry budget expires while new evidence shows a narrow extension is required for correctness, security, or completion.
Use when status reports emphasize tools, files, commits, plans, tokens, or agents while requirements and evidence remain unchanged.
Use when an agent-control framework needs adversarial testing for fake productivity, loops, recursion, evidence gaps, or vague wording.
Use when nested work is renamed, moved across agents, promoted to top level, or hidden behind research, validation, review, and dependency labels.
Use when non-trivial implementation starts before what exists, what changes, why, risks, and validation are sufficiently known.
Use when rules appear satisfied while their intent is bypassed, counters reset, classifications change conveniently, or an AI-Psychiatry audit is requested.
Use when durable memory may contain assumptions, stale facts, contradictions, duplicates, obsolete decisions, or temporary debugging state.
Use when a task may be underthinking, sufficiently reasoned, or overthinking and the correct next action is unclear.
Use when debugging changes assertions, mocks, exceptions, or symptoms without explaining materially important failure behavior.
Use when system, user, repository, domain, AI-Psychiatry, skill, memory, or task-state instructions appear incompatible.
Use when adjacent work is called required without dependency proof, or inconvenient required work is marked optional.
Use when different commands, tools, runners, plans, or agents repeat the same hypothesis and evidence target.
Use when implementation, parking, blocking, strategy switching, or completion happens before critical understanding and evidence exist.
Use when commands, labels, agents, counters, or classifications change while the same underlying behavior continues.
Use when BLOCKED is proposed after difficulty, uncertainty, unfamiliar code, a slow operation, or a small number of failed attempts.
Use when DONE is proposed with unrun tests, missing requirements, inferred success, happy-path-only proof, or unresolved required findings.
Use when context is overloaded or compression may have removed requirements, constraints, evidence, blockers, or decisions.
Use when an important implementation, architecture, security, data, or delivery decision rests on unresolved critical unknowns.
Use when mandatory behavior, integration, security, migration, or data requirements lack the appropriate kind of proof.
Use when an AI-Psychiatry budget expires while new evidence shows a narrow extension is required for correctness, security, or completion.
Use when status reports emphasize tools, files, commits, plans, tokens, or agents while requirements and evidence remain unchanged.
Use when an agent-control framework needs adversarial testing for fake productivity, loops, recursion, evidence gaps, or vague wording.
Use when nested work is renamed, moved across agents, promoted to top level, or hidden behind research, validation, review, and dependency labels.
Use when non-trivial implementation starts before what exists, what changes, why, risks, and validation are sufficiently known.
Use when rules appear satisfied while their intent is bypassed, counters reset, classifications change conveniently, or an AI-Psychiatry audit is requested.
Use when durable memory may contain assumptions, stale facts, contradictions, duplicates, obsolete decisions, or temporary debugging state.
Use when a task may be underthinking, sufficiently reasoned, or overthinking and the correct next action is unclear.
Use when debugging changes assertions, mocks, exceptions, or symptoms without explaining materially important failure behavior.