propose-experiment

name	propose-experiment
description	Design and propose the next step: either a regular data-gathering experiment, literature search, or a concrete solution candidate.
argument-hint	theory ID (e.g. T_20260616_123456_abcdef), and optionally an instruction to always or never propose a solution candidate (e.g. 'always propose a solution' or 'never propose a solution')

You are a researcher working on solving a particular goal. You can review the research goal by reading the file goal.txt in the current working directory. Right now, your task is to design and propose a single, high-value next step to advance the research goal, such as an experiment to conduct, a literature search to perform, or a concrete solution candidate to evaluate and verify.

Mandate & Proposal Types

You must select and propose one of three types of proposals based on your current understanding of the research progress:

1. Regular Experiment:

   • Use this to gather data, establish baselines, or test assumptions when more exploration is needed.
   • Propose a single, focused experiment that resolves a key knowledge gap, validates an assumption or hypothesis, or tests a promising optimization in the current theory / interpretation log.
   • At the very beginning of experimentation (i.e. if the current theory and interpretation log is still ~empty), it might be best to establish some baselines before trying to explore paths towards the goal.
   • Generally, try to propose an experiment that provides valuable information for moving towards the optimization goal in the long run. Notably, this doesn't mean that each individual experiment needs to move towards the goal directly. Rather, prioritize experiments that facilitate learning and exploration and which may help you later on by testing different directions, key assumptions, or ruling out unpromising paths.
   • As long as doing so doesn't reduce the quality of your results, try to keep experiments runtime efficient. For example, don't unnecessarily repeat previous configurations unless you have a good reason to do so. Look for ways to obtain the same observations with less overhead.
   • Required Heading in proposal.md: # Experiment Proposal: <title>
   • Output Files: proposal.md detailing motivation, experimental setup, expected outputs, and an executable Python script script.py set up to run the experiment. Also include the given theory ID in the proposal.md.

2. Literature Search:

   • Use this to search existing literature to answer a specific question or explore a topic.
   • Will perform an online search and download relevant papers when executed.
   • Required Heading in proposal.md: # Literature Search Proposal: <title>
   • Output Files: Only proposal.md is needed, which must contain the specific search prompt/query to search for. No script.py is needed. Also include the given theory ID in the proposal.md.

3. Solution Candidate:

   • When you have gathered enough understanding in the current theory to take a stab at solving the goal, consider emitting a solution proposal.
   • Required Heading in proposal.md: # Solution Candidate Proposal: <title>
   • Output Files: proposal.md describing the solution details, the actual solution files themselves (filenames are up to you), and a companion verification script script.py containing code to verify the solution. Also include the given theory ID in the proposal.md.
   • Verification Instructions: You must read the verification_instructions.txt file (present in the workspace) and strictly follow the instructions therein to write the verification script.py.

All experiment and verification files must be structured so they can run fully self-contained by executing the script.py file.

Input

Arguments: $ARGUMENTS

The arguments contain a theory ID (like T_...). Parse this ID from the arguments. Optionally, the arguments might instruct you to always or never propose a solution candidate.

Folder Setup

All commands must be run in the current working directory. Do not cd anywhere else, and do not try to use the global /tmp folder or TMPDIR (only use the local ./tmp folder).

Set up two folders — one for the input context, one for your own output:

• CONTEXT_DIR: mktemp -d -p ./tmp propose-experiment-context-XXXX
• OUTPUT_DIR: mktemp -d -p ./tmp propose-experiment-output-XXXX

Run this command to populate the context, which retrieves the theory from the database:

uv run python <SKILL_BASE_DIR>/scripts/context_manager.py create_context \
    --for_agent_type propose-experiment \
    --target_folder <CONTEXT_DIR> \
    --from_theory <T_ID>

• <CONTEXT_DIR>/theory/ — contains theory.md and optionally interpretation_log.md (read-only).
• <OUTPUT_DIR>/ — write your proposal files (proposal.md, and optional script.py / solution files) here.

Obtaining cited experiment IDs

Your inputs may cite specific experiment IDs (X_...). You can retrieve these experiments and their results by running:

uv run python <SKILL_BASE_DIR>/scripts/context_manager.py fetch_experiment --target_folder <CONTEXT_DIR> --from_experiment <EXPERIMENT_ID>

This command will place the experiment description (description.md), Python script (script.py), and results into the <CONTEXT_DIR>/experiments/<EXPERIMENT_ID> folder.

Obtaining cited solution IDs

Your inputs may cite specific solution IDs (U_...). You can retrieve these solutions and their contents by running:

uv run python <SKILL_BASE_DIR>/scripts/context_manager.py fetch_solution --target_folder <CONTEXT_DIR> --from_solution <SOLUTION_ID>

This command will place the solution candidate description (solution.md) and any related files into the <CONTEXT_DIR>/solutions/<SOLUTION_ID> folder.

Execution Steps

1. Context Checkout: Run the create_context bash command above to retrieve the theory from the database.
2. Review Current Research State: Read <CONTEXT_DIR>/theory/theory.md and additionally <CONTEXT_DIR>/theory/interpretation_log.md (if it exists) to understand the research goal, integrated theory we have developed so far, and any additional recent interpretation notes that have not yet been integrated back into the theory. Identify knowledge gaps, uncertainties, or promising directions to explore further towards the goal.
3. Determine Proposal Type: Decide whether to propose a Regular Experiment, Literature Search, or Solution Candidate based on your current progress. If the input arguments specify that you should always or never propose a solution candidate, you must follow those instructions.
4. Draft Proposal Document: Write a document named proposal.md (this exact filename is required) in your <OUTPUT_DIR>/. Ensure the file's first line contains the correct header specifying the type (e.g. # Experiment Proposal: <title>, # Literature Search Proposal: <title>, or # Solution Candidate Proposal: <title>). Include:
   • Motivation: Why this step is important.
   • Methodology/Setup: The details of the literature search prompt, regular experiment setup, or solution candidate mechanism.
   • Verification / Expected Outputs: How results will be observed or verified.
   • Estimated Cost/Runtime: Only for experiments: Estimated runtime for performing the experiment.
   • Theory ID: Include the ID (T_...) of the theory that this proposal is based on.
5. Write Solution:
   • If proposing a Solution Candidate, write the proposed solution into one or multiple files under <OUTPUT_DIR>/. Filenames under that folder are up to you and depend on what kind of solution is being requested by the research goal.
   • You can obtain the previous best solution mentioned in the theory (if any) using its ID (U_...) by running the fetch_solution command described above. Feel free to use it as a reference point for building your new solution.
6. Write Experiment / Verification Script: