Skip to main content

bind-mr-description

Drafting BIND 9 merge-request titles and descriptions — they feed the generated release notes, so the audience is system administrators. Use whenever writing or reviewing an MR title/description, when a change "needs a release note", or when tempted to touch doc/notes/.

Source facts

Repository
isc-projects/bind9
Last source activity
July 14, 2026 at 11:40
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
780
Forks
187

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
bind-mr-description
description
Drafting BIND 9 merge-request titles and descriptions — they feed the generated release notes, so the audience is system administrators. Use whenever writing or reviewing an MR title/description, when a change "needs a release note", or when tempted to touch doc/notes/.
# BIND 9 MR titles & descriptions The MR title + description ARE the release note — ISC's release tooling generates `doc/notes/` entries from merged MRs. Audience: system administrators, not engineers. ## Security framing: bug vs vulnerability Local-filesystem misbehavior is a BUG, not a vulnerability. BIND treats the local filesystem as trusted: no "privilege escalation", "local attacker", "exploit", "vulnerability", or CVE/severity language for symlink-following, local TOCTOU, or service-account issues. Describe it operationally ("X followed symlinks and could overwrite the wrong file"). Reserve security framing for remote or protocol surfaces: network input, DNS message parsing, configuration from an untrusted publisher, signed-zone integrity. Defensive code (lstat/O_NOFOLLOW, mkstemp) remains the right fix — only the framing changes. ## Title Short (under ~70 chars), leading with the user-visible impact (crash, wrong answers, resource exhaustion, new capability). ## Description - One short paragraph (typically 2–4 sentences), single flow: the operational problem, then the fix. No section headings, no bullet lists, no restating of the commit message. - Describe the trigger in operational terms — what the admin configures or does, what they observe. No function/struct/variable names, no programming jargon (TOCTOU, NULL dereference, use-after-free...). - Don't list individual changes; summarize the combined effect. Test-only or developer-only options get at most a brief mention at the end. - Don't add `Closes #NNNN`. - Scale to the change: a one-line fix gets ~3 sentences, not a structured template. **Internal-only exception:** for refactors with no operator-visible impact the audience is developers — naming internal functions is fine — but the title and description stay just as terse. ## Hard rules - NO `Assisted-by:` in MR titles or descriptions — that trailer belongs on commits; in release-note material it is noise for sysadmins. - NEVER create or edit files under `doc/notes/` — those are generated from merged MRs. A branch without a `doc/notes/` change is not missing anything; do not flag it in reviews. "Needs a release note" means: write a good MR title and description. - Hand the finished title/description to the user as text; never open the MR yourself (see the bind-commit skill's boundary).
View on GitHub