| name | assigning-to-others |
| description | Shared logic for resetting fields when assigning a task to another person. Enforces standard field constraints so the recipient can configure their own execution environment. Called by managing-tasks, delegating-tasks, and ingesting-messages.
|
| user-invocable | false |
Waggle — Assign-to-Others Field Reset
When assigning a task to someone other than the current user, apply the following field constraints. The rationale is that the recipient's execution environment (filesystem, git, agent session) is unknown to the delegator.
Silent operation: This skill runs as an internal step of an invoking skill. Return
results to the invoking flow without user-facing narration — the caller owns all user
communication. Only errors, warnings, and prompts required to proceed may surface directly.
Required Field Resets
| Field | Value | Reason |
|---|
Executor | human | The recipient decides how to execute |
Working Directory | blank | The recipient's filesystem is unknown |
Branch | blank | The recipient's git environment is unknown |
Session Reference | blank | The recipient's agent will record this |
Dispatched At | blank | The recipient's agent will record this |
Requires Review | unchecked | The recipient decides |
Acknowledged At | blank | The new assignee has not seen the task yet |
Rules
- Issuer is preserved — it tracks who originated the task, not the current assignee. Under v2.8.1+ this is enforced at the provider boundary: Notion's
created_by column type is read-only, and SQLite/Turso providers do not include issuer in their Update Task templates. Skills do not need to take any action to "preserve" Issuer; just refrain from passing it in update payloads. See the waggle-protocol skill, § Issuer Auto-Populate Contract.
- Assignee is set to exactly 1 person — the recipient. NEVER set multiple people in Assignee, even if the user says "assign to team X" or "assign to everyone". If the user requests a team or group assignment, ask which specific member to assign, or suggest splitting the task into per-member subtasks.
- These resets apply regardless of the task's current state. Even if the task previously had an AI executor, assigning to another person resets to
human.
Pre-assignment Quality Check (v2.8.0+, default-on, live cache-aware)
Before applying the field resets, invoke the reviewing-quality skill in live, cache-aware mode for the task. This catches tasks that bypassed the quality gates (Notion UI direct edits, legacy tasks) before they reach a new assignee.
Mode behavior:
- Cache hit + PASS → proceed with the resets silently (no LLM wait, the 99% case for tasks created through the v2.8.0 pipeline).
- Cache hit + NEEDS_REFINEMENT / REJECT → surface the cached gaps + suggested fixes to the user; ask
[Refine via /planning-tasks] [Assign anyway]. On "Refine", abort the assignment so the user can plan first. On "Assign anyway", proceed.
- Cache miss → invoke the Reviewer live (~10–20s). Assignment is rare enough that this latency is acceptable. Branch on the live verdict the same way.
Worthiness:* tagged tasks skip the Reviewer per protocol; their worthiness:calendar-like / worthiness:info-only classification is intentional, and re-evaluating them at assignment would be noise.
The [Assign anyway] override is always available. This gate is advisory, not enforcing — but unlike executing-tasks dispatch, it IS willing to pay the live Reviewer cost because delegation is the bypass-catch chokepoint.
When the task carries an unresolved reserved marker ([DRAFT-AC] / [DRAFT-EP] / [NEEDS-REFINE] / [INFERRED]), say so in the override prompt: assignment is allowed, but Ready stays blocked until the marker is resolved. Reassigning an unresolved task is legitimate — often it is exactly how it gets resolved, by handing it to whoever can answer — so do not block it. Just do not let the prompt imply the recipient can now promote it.
