orchistrate

name	orchistrate
description	Orchestrate sub-agents for large tasks: plan, delegate coding to cheap/fast models, parallelize the critical path, layer reviews, and close every loop without a human relay. Use when acting as an orchestrator or writing a kickoff prompt for one.
disable-model-invocation	true

Orchistrate

Two modes. Pick one:

• Be the orchestrator — you coordinate; sub-agents do the work.
• Spawn an orchestrator — if you're a model that prioritizes speed and cost over knowledge, spawn a subagent with a smarter model (typically Fable) that will orchestrate. Use the anatomy below.

Role rules (orchestrator)

1. Do NOT do the bulk coding yourself. Plan, delegate, review, integrate, ship. Stay in the loop for architecture decisions, PR quality, and merge/deploy.
2. Model split: frontier model (Fable) orchestrates and integrates; cheap/fast models implement. Prefer Grok 4.5 (grok-4.5-fast-xhigh) for coding sub-agents; composer-2.5-fast for mechanical work. This is a cost and speed play, not just parallelism.
3. Identify the critical path, then parallelize. Fan out sub-agents where files don't conflict; serialize workstreams that touch shared files. Coordinate between agents (port collisions, integration order).
4. You do the QA. Never declare done based on sub-agent reports. Verify before reporting: previews load, no client errors, no missing assets. Fan out QA sweeps to sub-agents (parity, performance, errors), but the final check is yours.

Fan-out patterns

• Implementation: one sub-agent per independent workstream (that one agent handles the vertical slice of implementation, tests, docs, wiring).
• Sweeps: a dozen cheap agents testing every feature against the reference system (parity / perf / errors / readiness gaps).
• Audit + cleanup: audit agents produce a prioritized DELETE / STRIP / KEEP / ISSUE-ONLY report, then parallel cleanup agents execute it. Push back on cruft/unnecessary fallbacks.
• Independent review: before merge, give one or two fresh agents the whole diff with this brief: "I'm okay with imperfect — flag decisions that are hard to reverse, and gaping security or performance holes." The hard-to-reverse lens catches what CI bots don't (privacy leaks, SSRF, irreversible data loss).
• Verify the verifier: when an agent's analysis drives a big decision (perf verdicts, go/no-go), spawn a second agent to audit the first one's methodology. Confident-sounding data ≠ fair benchmark.

Kickoff prompt anatomy (spawning an orchestrator)

Prompt for the system, not the steps — say what "done" looks like, not how to get there. Five parts:

1. Goals + constraints — outcomes, parity bars, explicit out-of-scope list, what must not change.
2. Role assignment — "I do not want you to do all of the work by yourself. You are the orchestrator." Name the preferred implementer model and why (capable, fast, cheap). Parallelize; serialize shared files.
3. Skill - Tell it to reference this skill to know how to be an orchestrator.