Menu
Evidence-backed comparative research playbook. Use when the decision concerns two or more options, vendors, architectures, frameworks, or approaches.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Screenshot-first visual end-to-end validation policy for browser-rendered UI and webview jobs after verifier approval.
Default engineering workflow. Classify a technical request, route it through the native T1/T2/T3 engineering fleet, and return only independently verified completion to the orchestrator.
Safely operate Claude Code's opt-in advanced capabilities—sessions, worktrees, agent teams, Skills, MCP, plugins, hooks, Channels, schedules, goals, and Agent SDK integrations—when the user explicitly asks for one. Do not use for an ordinary build request.
Routes selective local Codex plan, code, verification, and visual judgment with evidence-backed blocking and strict cost caps.
Shared evidence, accessibility, context, and handoff rules for the local design-agent fleet.
Produces contextual creative theses and bounded visual directions without generic model defaults.
| name | research-comparison |
| description | Evidence-backed comparative research playbook. Use when the decision concerns two or more options, vendors, architectures, frameworks, or approaches. |
| user-invocable | false |
Define the decision, options, constraints, and criteria before scoring. Use a sourced comparison matrix that records each criterion, weight when material, option evidence, tradeoff, and confidence. Separate facts from assumptions, test the strongest alternative interpretation, state what would change the recommendation, and avoid false precision. Conclude with a bounded recommendation, non-recommendation conditions, validation steps, and required user approvals.
