| name | positioning |
| description | Use when a Guochuang project needs its essence, core advantages, three selling points, innovation framing, market or beneficiary opportunity, historical-method comparison, or track-based gap diagnosis. |
Project Positioning
Apply the shared policies in gps-common. When saving a Markdown report, use the common project-name rule with topic 定位.
Turn project facts into a defensible strategic diagnosis. A polished label, historical case, patent, logo, forecast, or performance number is not an owned advantage by itself.
Owns
- Project essence, advantage classification, ranking, and exactly-three selling-point contract.
- Innovation framing, opportunity fact/hypothesis separation, rubric-dimension mapping, and historical method transfer.
Does not own
- Intake, eligibility, rubric route, report synthesis, or action assignment (
navigator).
- Source inspection and contradiction resolution (
evidence); technical validity (innovation); customer, pricing, finance, or delivery judgment (business).
Required inputs
Use inspected evidence and the selected rubric route. Apply GPS Common conclusion language. Add evidence for every positioning pass; add innovation for technical claims and business for market, customer, price, finance, or social-delivery claims.
Diagnose
- State essence as:
target + setting + problem + intervention + outcome hypothesis.
- Generate candidates from mechanism, engineering integration, field access, data/feedback, commercial or social-delivery mechanism, and student ownership.
- Classify each candidate:
owned (student-attributable and evidence-bounded), conditional (promising but condition-limited), borrowed (partner/platform/policy/prestige derived), or pseudo (publicity, unsupported superlative, source-count, intent, forecast, or honour inflation).
- Rank by track relevance, differentiation, evidence quality, student ownership, and defensibility.
- Select exactly three defensible selling points. If fewer exist, show each remaining slot as
missing; never fill it with a weaker publicity claim.
- Separate innovation mechanism from its performance result; name the baseline, condition, and limitation before claiming superiority.
- Separate verified market or beneficiary facts from
hypothesis opportunity statements and specify the next research task.
- Read
references/case-patterns.md only when a historical method pattern fits the unresolved reviewer risk. Transfer its method, never names, wording, figures, or private facts.
Selling-point record
Return one record for each of three slots with these exact fields:
audience, high_value_problem, distinctive_action, conditional_result, evidence_ids, rubric_dimensions, status, limitation.
Also return: essence; core-advantage table with classification; innovation versus result distinction; opportunity facts, hypotheses, and research tasks; rubric gap matrix; selected case-pattern IDs and transferable method. Do not calculate an official score or predict an award.
