resume-crafter

name	resume-crafter
description	Use when creating, rewriting, or converting a source-backed 1-2 page resume from chat, documents, PDFs, images, or mixed artifacts.

Resume Crafter

Overview

Coordinate a four-skill workflow for mainstream 1-2 page resumes. Clarify blocking unknowns before drafting, keep every claim traceable to source material, and keep all generated artifacts inside one fresh workspace.

When to Use

• User wants a new 1-2 page resume from requirements in chat.
• User wants an existing resume rewritten into a polished LaTeX resume.
• User provides .docx, .pdf, images, screenshots, or mixed source files for resume conversion.
• User wants both editable .tex and final .pdf outputs.
• User provides existing .tex plus .pdf and wants a cleaned or rebuilt resume.
• User asks for a long academic CV and needs scope narrowing to a concise research resume.

Do not produce cover letters, slide decks, portfolios, unrelated document work, or long academic CVs. If the user asks for a long CV, explain that this package targets 1-2 page resumes and ask whether to create a concise research resume instead.

Asset Root

• Use CV_SKILL_ROOT as the absolute path to this skill package.
• Resolve CV_SKILL_ROOT in this order: first use an explicit user-provided CV_SKILL_ROOT if present; otherwise use the known repository/package checkout location if the runtime exposes the loaded skill path or the skills are still installed under the repo; if neither is available, ask the user for the absolute asset root before using bundled templates.
• Read bundled templates, examples, tests, and docs from CV_SKILL_ROOT.
• Do not guess repository-relative paths such as templates/... from the current working directory.

Workflow

1. Create a fresh workspace named resume-workspace-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS unless the user provides another folder.
2. Never reuse a non-empty workspace without explicit user confirmation.
3. Create input/, work/, and output/ inside the workspace.
4. Copy or place all source artifacts under input/ and keep notes, extraction, and drafts under work/.
5. Identify whether the target is industry, research-oriented, Chinese standard, or photo/visual.
6. Invoke resume-intake-and-extraction before any drafting.
7. Identify missing-blocking items and quality-critical unknowns before authoring.
8. Ask targeted confirmation questions for quality-critical unknowns; do not downgrade them to avoid interruption.
9. After answers arrive, update work/extracted.md, work/requirements-summary.md, and work/claim-source-map.md with the user confirmations.
10. Invoke resume-authoring-and-assembly only after all missing-blocking items are resolved or audited as omitted with explicit approval.
11. Invoke resume-review-and-delivery to review, build, and package the outputs.

Required Working Files

• work/extracted.md: normalized source material
• work/requirements-summary.md: target, template choice, gaps, omissions, and user confirmations
• work/claim-source-map.md: every resume claim mapped to source material and confidence state
• work/resume.tex: draft LaTeX source

Claim Map Schema

Use this six-column header in work/claim-source-map.md:

Claim	Source artifact	Source locator	Raw wording or user confirmation	State	Final handling

Uncertainty States

• resolved: confirmed and safe to use
• needs-confirmation: non-blocking, visible in working notes, not final prose unless confirmed
• omitted-unresolved: unresolved and intentionally left out of final prose
• missing-blocking: blocks drafting or finalization

Final output eligibility:

• resolved: may appear in final resume prose.
• needs-confirmation: may appear only in working notes, never in final prose.
• omitted-unresolved: records an intentional omission and must not appear in final prose.
• missing-blocking: blocks authoring and finalization until resolved or audited as omitted with explicit user approval.

Quality-Critical Unknowns

Some unknowns are too important to silently omit. If an unknown affects identity, headline, target role, language-localized presentation, required or user-visible contact-block choices, user-explicit requirements, or any content whose omission would make the resume visibly worse or mismatched, mark it missing-blocking and ask a targeted question before drafting.

Do not resolve quality-critical uncertainty by guessing. Do not resolve it by silently deleting the field. Omission is allowed only after explicit user approval recorded in the omission audit.

Use a brainstorming-style question approach: ask questions that clarify purpose, constraints, and success criteria; ask one question at a time when the answer changes the next decision; use concise multiple-choice options when they reduce friction; and batch only the minimal independent blocking facts needed to unblock drafting.

Omission Audit

Record every intentionally omitted blocking item in work/requirements-summary.md with:

• omitted field or claim
• reason for omission
• explicit user approval
• impact on final wording

Guardrails

• Intake decides what is known, unknown, or unsafe.
• Authoring may draft only from resolved facts or conservative wording supported by resolved claim-map entries.
• Do not generalize, upgrade, or reframe facts unless broader wording is source-backed or user-confirmed.
• Review-and-delivery may finalize only when every final factual claim maps to a resolved entry, missing-blocking items are resolved or audited with clear approval, [confirm] markers are cleared, the omission audit is complete, and output/resume.pdf exists after a clean output-local build.
• For ATS-sensitive industry use, default away from photos, multi-column layouts, and icon-heavy contact blocks unless the user explicitly accepts the tradeoff after it is explained.
• Keep all generated content inside the current run's workspace. Do not write resume output into skills/, templates/, docs/, examples/, or repo root paths.

High-Risk Uncertainty

Unresolved high-risk items must be resolved or audited as omitted with explicit user approval and absent from final prose:

• identity, localized display name, contact, degree, school, employer, title, date, location, or chronology ambiguity
• publication authorship, venue, status, advisor, award, grant, or patent ambiguity
• metrics, ownership scope, impact claims, tool lists, and leadership claims not directly source-backed
• ATS/photo tradeoffs, language/template mismatch, header/display choices, or any choice that could make the resume misleading or visibly mismatched to the requested deliverable

Runtime Boundaries

• During end-user resume generation, use only these bundled skills for resume workflow decisions: resume-crafter, resume-intake-and-extraction, resume-authoring-and-assembly, and resume-review-and-delivery.
• Use upstream docx only when .docx input requires it.
• Use upstream pdf only when .pdf input requires it.
• For image or screenshot input, use the host platform's built-in image reading or OCR path when available. Do not add unrelated OCR or document-generation skills just to handle images.
• Do not route core resume decisions through unrelated runtime skills.

Output Contract

• Final deliverables: output/resume.pdf as the required final deliverable, plus corresponding source files output/resume.tex and output/common/resume.cls.
• If PDF tooling is unavailable, resume-review-and-delivery must attempt to install or activate a XeLaTeX-capable environment. If installation or compilation cannot complete, return a blocker; do not present source files alone as final delivery.
• Both work/resume.tex and output/resume.tex use \documentclass{common/resume}.
• Working files stay under the generated workspace folder.
• Preserve work/review.md and work/build.log when review or build runs.
• If factual risk remains unresolved, return a review/blocker state instead of presenting the resume as final.

Rework Routing

• Factual/source blocker: return to resume-intake-and-extraction and update work/extracted.md, work/requirements-summary.md, and work/claim-source-map.md.
• Wording, section, template, or page-count blocker: return to resume-authoring-and-assembly.
• Local LaTeX assembly error: resume-review-and-delivery may fix and rebuild if no new facts or scope changes are needed.
• Tooling, permission, network, or environment blocker preventing PDF generation: report the blocker through resume-crafter and do not finalize.