deep-research

name	deep-research
description	Conduct comprehensive, multi-source research using web search, documentation lookup, and critical analysis. Use when the user asks for deep research, thorough investigation, or broad evidence-based analysis of complex topics.

Deep Research Skill

This skill provides a systematic approach to conducting thorough research on any topic.

Overview

Enable the AI to perform comprehensive research by:

1. Breaking down complex topics into researchable components
2. Using multiple information sources (web search, documentation, academic sources)
3. Applying critical thinking to synthesize findings
4. Presenting well-structured, evidence-based conclusions

When to Use

Activate this skill when users request:

• "Deep research on [topic]"
• "Comprehensive analysis of [subject]"
• "Investigate [topic] thoroughly"
• "Research the latest information about [subject]"
• "Gather detailed information on [topic]"

Example Topics:

• AI agent evaluation metrics and methodologies
• Latest AI/ML news and developments
• Technology stack comparisons
• Market analysis and trends
• Academic literature reviews
• Best practices for specific domains

Research Process

Phase 1: Scoping & Planning

Define Research Objectives:

• Identify core questions to answer
• Determine scope and boundaries
• List key areas to investigate
• Establish success criteria

Plan Information Sources:

• Web search for current information
• Documentation (Context7) for technical details
• Academic/industry sources for authoritative information
• Community resources (GitHub, forums) for practical insights

Phase 2: Information Gathering

Multi-Source Search Strategy:

1. Broad Overview Search

   • Use general web search for landscape understanding
   • Identify key terms, concepts, and authorities
   • Note publication dates for recency

2. Targeted Deep Dives

   • Search specific sub-topics identified in overview
   • Look for:
     • Official documentation
     • Academic papers
     • Industry reports
     • Expert opinions
     • Case studies
     • Code examples (when relevant)

3. Documentation Lookup

   • Use Context7 for library-specific documentation
   • Check official API references
   • Review changelog and release notes

4. Cross-Reference Validation

   • Verify claims across multiple sources
   • Check for consensus vs. outlier opinions
   • Note conflicts or controversies

Phase 3: Critical Analysis

Apply Critical Thinking:

• Source Credibility

  • Evaluate author authority
  • Check publication/organization reputation
  • Consider potential biases
  • Verify publication dates for currency

• Evidence Quality

  • Distinguish facts from opinions
  • Look for empirical data
  • Assess methodology rigor
  • Check for reproducibility

• Logical Coherence

  • Identify logical fallacies
  • Check argument consistency
  • Evaluate reasoning chains
  • Note assumptions

• Practical Relevance

  • Assess real-world applicability
  • Consider implementation challenges
  • Evaluate cost-benefit tradeoffs
  • Identify gaps or limitations

Phase 4: Synthesis & Presentation

Structure Findings:

1. Executive Summary

   • Key findings (3-5 bullet points)
   • Main conclusions
   • Critical insights

2. Detailed Analysis

   • Organized by theme or component
   • Evidence from multiple sources
   • Comparative analysis where applicable
   • Technical details as needed

3. Practical Implications

   • Actionable recommendations
   • Implementation considerations
   • Risk factors
   • Next steps

4. Source Attribution

   • Cite all major sources
   • Link to original materials
   • Note publication dates
   • Indicate confidence levels

Output Format:

# Research: [Topic]

## Executive Summary
- Key finding 1
- Key finding 2
- Key finding 3

## Detailed Findings

### [Aspect 1]
[Analysis with sources]

### [Aspect 2]
[Analysis with sources]

## Critical Analysis
[Evaluation of evidence quality, conflicts, gaps]

## Practical Implications
[Actionable insights and recommendations]

## Sources
- [Source 1] (Date, URL)
- [Source 2] (Date, URL)

## Research Metadata
- Search queries used: [list]
- Sources consulted: [count]
- Date conducted: [date]
- Confidence level: [High/Medium/Low with explanation]

Special Considerations

For AI/ML Topics

• Check multiple perspectives (academic, industry, open-source)
• Look for benchmarks and evaluation metrics
• Review code implementations when available
• Consider ethical implications
• Note limitations and biases

For Current Events/News

• Use recent search results (last 30 days)
• Cross-reference multiple news sources
• Distinguish reporting from opinion
• Note evolving situations
• Check for updates

For Technical Evaluations

• Review official documentation first
• Look for community experiences
• Check GitHub issues/discussions
• Find performance benchmarks
• Assess maturity and support

For Business/Strategy Topics

• Look for market data
• Review competitor analysis
• Check industry reports
• Consider multiple frameworks
• Assess risk factors

Quality Checklist

Before concluding research, verify:

• Multiple authoritative sources consulted
• Recent information included (check dates)
• Key perspectives represented
• Evidence quality assessed
• Conflicts/controversies noted
• Practical implications identified
• Sources properly cited
• Confidence level stated
• Gaps/limitations acknowledged
• Actionable conclusions provided

Tools to Use

• WebSearch: For general information and current events
• WebFetch: For detailed content from specific URLs
• Context7: For library/framework documentation
• Task (Explore agent): For multi-step investigations
• Critical thinking: Throughout the process

Iteration

If research reveals:

• Conflicting information: Investigate further, present multiple viewpoints
• Insufficient information: Expand search terms, try different sources
• Complex sub-topics: Break down further and research systematically
• Outdated information: Search for more recent sources
• Gaps in understanding: Ask clarifying questions to user

Examples

Example 1: AI Agent Evaluation

User: "Deep research on AI agent evaluation metrics and methods"

Process:

1. Web search for "AI agent evaluation metrics 2025"
2. Web search for "LLM agent benchmarking frameworks"
3. Look for academic papers on agent evaluation
4. Check GitHub for evaluation tools/frameworks
5. Review industry reports (e.g., Stanford AI Index)
6. Synthesize: metrics categories, methods, tools, best practices
7. Present: structured report with sources

Example 2: Latest AI News

User: "Research the latest AI news and developments"

Process:

1. Web search for "AI news latest 2025" (last 30 days)
2. Check multiple sources: tech news sites, AI-specific outlets, academic announcements
3. Categorize: model releases, research breakthroughs, industry developments, policy changes
4. Verify claims across sources
5. Present: organized summary with dates and links

Example 3: Technology Comparison

User: "Deep research comparing Next.js and Remix for production apps"

Process:

1. Context7 for official documentation of both
2. Web search for "Next.js vs Remix 2025 comparison"
3. Check GitHub stars, issues, community activity
4. Look for case studies and production usage
5. Review performance benchmarks
6. Analyze: feature comparison, learning curve, ecosystem, performance
7. Present: comparative analysis with recommendations

Notes

• Time Estimate: Allow 10-20 minutes for thorough research
• Iteration: May require follow-up questions to user for focus
• Scope Management: For broad topics, propose breaking into sub-topics
• Transparency: Always indicate confidence level and limitations
• Recency: Always note when information was published/updated

Core Workflow

Follow the primary workflow, commands, and decision points documented in the sections below.

Best Practices

Follow the constraints, conventions, and cautions documented below, and prefer the documented path over improvisation.

References

Use any linked scripts, assets, reference files, and companion resources mentioned in this document.