| name | citation-form-check |
| description | Verifies every paper or named research result cited in a substacker draft uses the inline "Author(s), Institution, Year" form per style-guide, not a bare hyperlink or title-alone reference. Flags bare-hyperlink citations and missing-institution attributions. Use whenever the draft references external research. Trigger keywords — citation, paper citation, bare hyperlink, authors, institution, reference format. |
Citation Form Check
Table of Contents
Related skills: Called by Editor in voice pass. Reads shared-context/style-guide.md for the citation template.
Correct form
From style-guide.md:
Papers cited in prose: Author(s), Institution, Year — Title on first mention. Not a bare hyperlink, not a title alone.
Examples of correct:
- "Chen et al., Google, 2024 showed that retrieval beats parametric recall at the tail."
- "Vaswani et al. (Google Brain, 2017) introduced the Transformer architecture."
- "Dao et al., 2022, on FlashAttention demonstrated that memory is O(N), not O(N²)."
Examples to flag:
- "this paper" — bare hyperlink without author + institution.
- "A Google paper said…" — no authors.
- "Attention Is All You Need" (title only) — no authors, no year.
- "Recent research shows…" — no citation at all.
Workflow
Citation check draft D:
- [ ] Step 1: Detect paper references (arXiv patterns, italicized titles, hyperlinks to paper sites, "a paper")
- [ ] Step 2: For each reference, parse surrounding sentence for author + institution
- [ ] Step 3: If author OR institution missing, flag tier-2 (unless it's the second+ mention of a paper already correctly cited once)
- [ ] Step 4: Suggest the correct form
Detection patterns
- arXiv URLs:
arxiv.org/abs/\d{4}\.\d{4,5}
- DOIs:
10\.\d+/\S+
- Italicized titles:
\*[A-Z][^*]+\* of length ≥3 words (filters out italicized phrases)
- Hyperlinks to paper sites:
(arxiv|openreview|papers\.nips|proceedings)
- Generic "a paper" / "recent research" / "a Google paper"
Exemption
If a paper is correctly cited in full on first mention, subsequent mentions can use a short form ("Chen et al. also noted…"). Only first-mention requires full Author, Institution, Year.
Worked example
Draft:
RAG (as shown in this paper) beats fine-tuning for recall.
A Google paper found that retrieval dominates for rare facts.
Attention Is All You Need is the foundational work.
Chen et al., Google, 2024 — "Fine-Tuning or Retrieval?" — compared both approaches; Chen et al. concluded fine-tuning loses on tail knowledge.
Flags:
- (Tier-2) "this paper" — bare hyperlink. Rewrite: "Lewis et al., FAIR, 2020 — Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks."
- (Tier-2) "A Google paper" — no authors. Rewrite: insert authors, year, title.
- (Tier-2) "Attention Is All You Need" — title only. Rewrite: "Vaswani et al., Google Brain, 2017 — Attention Is All You Need."
- (PASS) Chen et al. citation is correct on first mention; second mention (short form) is acceptable.
Guardrails
- Citation form is tier-2. The writer can publish with a bare hyperlink; it's a craft miss, not a voice violation.
- Don't flag mentions of blogs, tools, or GitHub projects — only formal research citations.
- First mention rule: full form required. Subsequent mentions can be short.
- If the writer uses a different citation template (e.g., footnote-based), respect the style-guide.
- Never rewrite a citation without the writer's confirmation — suggest only.
- Don't flag citations the writer explicitly annotates
[short] in their draft (convention for intentional short-form on first mention).
Quick reference
- Input: draft + style-guide.md.
- Output: citation flags with tier-2 severity.
- First mention = full form; subsequent mentions = short form.