| name | ai-llm-inference |
| description | Operational patterns for LLM inference: latency budgeting, tail-latency control, caching, batching/scheduling, quantization/compression, parallelism, and reliable serving at scale. Emphasizes production-grade performance, cost control, and observability. |
LLMOps โ Inference & Optimization โ Production Skill Hub
Modern Best Practices (January 2026):
This skill provides production-ready operational patterns for optimizing LLM inference performance, cost, and reliability. It centralizes decision rules, optimization strategies, configuration templates, and operational checklists for inference workloads.
No theory. No narrative. Only what Claude can execute.
When to Use This Skill
Claude should activate this skill whenever the user asks for:
- Optimizing LLM inference latency or throughput
- Choosing quantization strategies (FP8/FP4/INT8/INT4)
- Configuring vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, or DeepSpeed inference
- Scaling LLM inference across GPUs (tensor/pipeline parallelism)
- Building high-throughput LLM APIs
- Improving context window performance (KV cache optimization)
- Using speculative decoding for faster generation
- Reducing cost per token
- Profiling and benchmarking inference workloads
- Planning infrastructure capacity
- CPU/edge deployment patterns
- High availability and resilience patterns
Scope Boundaries (Use These Skills for Depth)
- Prompting, tuning, datasets โ ai-llm
- RAG pipeline construction โ ai-rag
- Deployment, APIs, monitoring โ ai-mlops
- Safety, governance โ ai-mlops
Quick Reference
| Task | Tool/Framework | Command/Pattern | When to Use |
|---|
| Latency budget | SLO + load model | TTFT/ITL + P95/P99 under load | Any production endpoint |
| Tail-latency control | Scheduling + timeouts | Admission control + queue caps + backpressure | Prevent p99 explosions |
| Throughput | Batching + KV-cache aware serving | Continuous batching + KV paging | High concurrency serving |
| Cost control | Model tiering + caching | Cache (prefix/response) + quotas | Reduce spend and overload risk |
| Long context | Prefill optimization | Chunked prefill + prompt compression | Long inputs and RAG-heavy apps |
| Parallelism | TP/PP/DP | Choose by model size and interconnect | Models that do not fit one device |
| Reliability | Resilience patterns | Timeouts + circuit breakers + idempotency | Avoid cascading failures |
Decision Tree: Inference Optimization Strategy
Need to optimize LLM inference: [Optimization Path]
โโ Primary constraint: Throughput?
โ โโ Many concurrent users? โ batching + KV-cache aware serving + admission control
โ โโ Mostly batch/offline? โ batch inference jobs + large batches + spot capacity
โ
โโ Primary constraint: Cost?
โ โโ Can accept lower quality tier? โ model tiering (small/medium/large router)
โ โโ Must keep quality? โ caching + prompt/context reduction before quantization
โ
โโ Primary constraint: Latency?
โ โโ Draft model acceptable? โ speculative decoding
โ โโ Long context? โ prefill optimizations + attention kernels + context budgets
โ
โโ Large model (>70B)?
โ โโ Multiple GPUs? โ Tensor parallelism (NVLink required)
โ โโ Deep model? โ Pipeline parallelism (minimize bubbles)
โ
โโ Edge deployment?
โโ CPU + quantization โ Optimized for constrained resources
Core Concepts & Practices
Core Concepts (Vendor-Agnostic)
- Latency components: queueing + prefill + decode; optimize the largest contributor first.
- Tail latency: p99 is dominated by queuing and long prompts; fix with admission control and context budgets.
- Retries: retries can multiply load; bound retries and use hedged requests only with strict budgets.
- Caching: prefix caching helps repeated system/tool scaffolds; response caching helps repeated questions (requires invalidation).
- Security & privacy: prompts/outputs can contain sensitive data; scrub logs, enforce auth/tenancy, and rate-limit abuse (OWASP LLM Top 10: https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-for-large-language-model-applications/).
Implementation Practices (Tooling Examples)
- Measure under load: benchmark TTFT/ITL and p95/p99 with realistic concurrency and prompt lengths.
- Separate environments: dev/stage/prod model configs; promote only after passing the inference review checklist.
- Export telemetry: request-level tokens, TTFT/ITL, queue depth, GPU memory headroom, and error classes (OpenTelemetry GenAI semantic conventions: https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/semconv/gen-ai/).
Do / Avoid
Do
- Do enforce
max_input_tokens and max_output_tokens at the API boundary.
- Do cap concurrency and queue depth; return overload errors quickly.
- Do validate quality after any quantization or kernel change.
Avoid
- Avoid unbounded retries (amplifies outages).
- Avoid unbounded context windows (OOM + latency spikes).
- Avoid benchmarking on single requests; always test with realistic concurrency.
Resources (Detailed Operational Guides)
For comprehensive guides on specific topics, see:
Infrastructure & Serving
Performance Optimization
Deployment & Operations
Templates
Inference Configs
Production-ready configuration templates for leading inference engines:
Quantization & Compression
Model compression templates for reducing memory and cost:
Serving Pipelines
High-throughput serving architectures:
Caching & Batching
Performance optimization templates:
Benchmarking
Performance measurement and validation:
Checklists
Navigation
Resources
Templates
Data
Related Skills
This skill focuses on inference-time performance. For related workflows:
- ai-llm - Prompting, fine-tuning, application architecture
- ai-rag - RAG pipeline construction and optimization
- ai-mlops - Deployment, monitoring, safety, and governance
- qa-observability - Performance monitoring and optimization
- ops-devops-platform - Infrastructure and platform operations
External Resources
See data/sources.json for:
- Serving frameworks (vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, DeepSpeed-MII)
- Quantization libraries (GPTQ, AWQ, bitsandbytes, LLM Compressor)
- FlashAttention, FlashInfer, xFormers
- GPU hardware guides and optimization docs
- Benchmarking frameworks and tools
Use this skill whenever the user needs LLM inference performance, cost reduction, or serving architecture guidance.