Menu
Comprehensive UX audit using IxDF's 7 factors, 5 usability characteristics, and 5 interaction dimensions. Holistic evaluation with redesign proposals based on user-centered design principles.
Conduct enterprise-grade research with multi-source synthesis, citation tracking, and verification. Use when user needs comprehensive analysis requiring 10+ sources, verified claims, or comparison of approaches. Triggers include "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", or "analyze trends". Do NOT use for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.
Web scraping with anti-bot bypass, content extraction, undocumented APIs and poison pill detection. Use when extracting content from websites, handling paywalls, implementing scraping cascades or processing social media. Covers requests, trafilatura, Playwright with stealth mode, yt-dlp and instaloader patterns.
Production-tested setup for Tailwind CSS v4 with shadcn/ui, Vite, and React. Use when: initializing React projects with Tailwind v4, setting up shadcn/ui, implementing dark mode, debugging CSS variable issues, fixing theme switching, migrating from Tailwind v3, or encountering color/theming problems. Covers: @theme inline pattern, CSS variable architecture, dark mode with ThemeProvider, component composition, vite.config setup, common v4 gotchas, and production-tested patterns. Keywords: Tailwind v4, shadcn/ui, @tailwindcss/vite, @theme inline, dark mode, CSS variables, hsl() wrapper, components.json, React theming, theme switching, colors not working, variables broken, theme not applying, @plugin directive, typography plugin, forms plugin, prose class, @tailwindcss/typography, @tailwindcss/forms
Use when reviewing code security, auditing dependencies for CVEs, checking configuration or secret security, assessing authentication and authorization patterns, identifying OWASP vulnerabilities (injection, XSS, CSRF), or addressing security concerns about implementations.
Use when evaluating business model viability, analyzing profitability per customer/product/transaction, validating startup metrics (CAC, LTV, payback period), making pricing decisions, assessing scalability, comparing business models, or when user mentions unit economics, CAC/LTV ratio, contribution margin, customer profitability, break-even analysis, or needs to determine if a business can be profitable at scale.
When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," or "SEO health check." For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema-markup.
| name | ux-audit-rethink |
| description | Comprehensive UX audit using IxDF's 7 factors, 5 usability characteristics, and 5 interaction dimensions. Holistic evaluation with redesign proposals based on user-centered design principles. |
This skill enables AI agents to perform a comprehensive, holistic UX audit based on the Interaction Design Foundation's methodology from "The Basics of User Experience Design". It evaluates products across multiple dimensions and proposes strategic redesign recommendations.
Unlike focused evaluations (Nielsen, WCAG, Don Norman), this skill provides a 360-degree UX assessment combining factors, characteristics, dimensions, and research techniques into a unified framework.
Use this skill for complete UX evaluations, product strategy decisions, or as an entry point before diving into specific audits.
Combine with "Nielsen Heuristics" for usability depth, "WCAG Accessibility" for compliance, or "Cognitive Walkthrough" for task-specific analysis.
Invoke this skill when:
When executing this audit, gather:
This skill evaluates across three core dimensions:
Based on Peter Morville's User Experience Honeycomb:
From ISO 9241-11 and usability research:
Formula: Utility (right features) + Usability (easy to use) = Usefulness
From Gillian Crampton Smith and Kevin Silver:
Follow these steps systematically:
Understand the Product:
app_description thoroughlyCreate User Personas (if not provided):
Example Persona:
Name: Sarah, Busy Professional
Age: 32, Marketing Manager
Goals: Quick task completion, mobile-first
Frustrations: Complex interfaces, slow loading
Tech Level: High
Context: On-the-go, multitasking, time-sensitive
Document Assumptions:
For each factor, assess and rate 1-5:
Question: Does the product solve real user problems and provide value?
Evaluate:
Analysis:
Rating Criteria:
Question: Is it easy to use and navigate?
Evaluate:
Common Issues:
Question: Can users easily locate content and features?
Evaluate:
Test:
Question: Does it inspire trust and confidence?
Evaluate:
Trust Signals:
Question: Is it aesthetically appealing and emotionally engaging?
Evaluate:
Beyond Functional:
Question: Is it inclusive for all users, including those with disabilities?
Evaluate:
Quick Checks:
Question: Does it deliver value to both users and the business?
Evaluate:
Balance:
7 Factors Summary:
| Factor | Rating | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Useful | 4/5 | ✅ Good | Medium |
| Usable | 3/5 | ⚠️ Needs work | High |
| Findable | 2/5 | ❌ Poor | Critical |
| Credible | 4/5 | ✅ Good | Low |
| Desirable | 3/5 | ⚠️ Needs work | Medium |
| Accessible | 2/5 | ❌ Poor | High |
| Valuable | 4/5 | ✅ Good | Low |
Overall UX Factor Score: 22/35 (63%) - Acceptable, significant improvement needed
Definition: Can users achieve their goals accurately and completely?
Evaluate:
Metrics:
Issues Found:
Definition: Can users complete tasks quickly with minimal effort?
Evaluate:
Metrics:
Efficiency Issues:
Definition: Is the interface pleasant, satisfying, and enjoyable to use?
Evaluate:
Qualitative:
Definition: Can users easily prevent, recognize, and recover from errors?
Evaluate:
Common Issues:
Definition: Can new users quickly learn to use the product without extensive training?
Evaluate:
Test:
Usability Characteristics Summary:
| Characteristic | Rating | Status | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effectiveness | 4/5 | ✅ Good | High |
| Efficiency | 3/5 | ⚠️ Needs work | High |
| Engagement | 3/5 | ⚠️ Needs work | Medium |
| Error Tolerance | 2/5 | ❌ Poor | Critical |
| Ease of Learning | 3/5 | ⚠️ Needs work | High |
Overall Usability Score: 15/25 (60%) - Below target, improvement essential
Utility Check: Are the right features present? (Yes/No/Partial) Usefulness Score: Utility + Usability = [Assessment]
Evaluate:
Examples to Check:
Issues:
Evaluate:
Check:
Evaluate:
Mobile Considerations (Chapter 8 - IxDF):
Evaluate:
Timing Guidelines:
10s: User multitasks, needs status
Evaluate:
Interaction Patterns:
Interaction Design Summary:
| Dimension | Rating | Key Issues |
|---|---|---|
| Words | 3/5 | Technical jargon, inconsistent terms |
| Visual Representations | 4/5 | Minor icon clarity issues |
| Physical Objects/Space | 2/5 | Small touch targets, poor mobile optimization |
| Time | 3/5 | Slow loading, missing progress indicators |
| Behavior | 3/5 | Weak feedback, inconsistent patterns |
Overall Interaction Design Score: 15/25 (60%)
Recommend or simulate research methods:
Discovery:
Follow-up:
For Presenting Findings:
Ethical Considerations:
Consolidate Findings:
Create prioritized issue list:
## Critical Issues (Fix Immediately)
### Issue 1: Poor Error Tolerance - No Undo for Deletions
- **Frameworks Violated**: Usability (Error Tolerance 2/5), UX Factor (Usable 3/5)
- **User Impact**: Users lose data, frustration, decreased trust
- **Business Impact**: Support tickets, user churn
- **Evidence**: User feedback: "Accidentally deleted project, can't recover"
- **Severity**: Critical
- **Effort**: Medium (2-3 days)
- **Recommendation**: Add confirmation dialog + undo buffer (30s)
### Issue 2: Information Not Findable - Hidden Search
- **Frameworks Violated**: UX Factor (Findable 2/5), Interaction (Words/Visual)
- **User Impact**: Can't locate content, abandons task
- **Business Impact**: Decreased engagement, lower conversions
- **Evidence**: Analytics show 70% exit on navigation
- **Severity**: High
- **Effort**: Low (1 day)
- **Recommendation**: Add prominent search bar in header
[Continue for all critical issues...]
Prioritization Matrix:
| Issue | User Impact | Business Impact | Effort | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No undo on delete | High | High | Medium | P0 |
| Hidden search | High | Medium | Low | P0 |
| Slow loading | Medium | Medium | High | P1 |
| Poor mobile UX | High | High | High | P1 |
Priority Levels:
Use Design Thinking Process:
Template: [Persona] needs [need] because [insight]
Examples:
Brainstorm Approaches:
For Findability Issues:
Selection Criteria:
Proposal 1: Simplified Navigation Redesign
Current Issues:
Proposed Solution:
Header:
[Logo] [Search Bar] [Key Actions: Add, Notifications, Profile]
Main Navigation (3 levels max):
- Dashboard
- Projects
- Active
- Archived
- Resources
- Help Center
- Community
Mobile: Hamburger menu with same structure
Expected Impact:
Effort: 2 weeks (design + development)
Proposal 2: Enhanced Error Tolerance System
Current Issues:
Proposed Solution:
Undo System
Confirmation Dialogs
Improved Error Messages
Expected Impact:
Effort: 1.5 weeks
Proposal 3: Mobile-First Redesign
Current Issues:
Proposed Solution (per IxDF Chapter 8):
Small Screen Optimization
One-Direction Scrolling
Simplified Navigation
Minimal Content
Reduced Text Input
Stable Connections
Integrated Experience
Expected Impact:
Effort: 4 weeks (full mobile redesign)
Next Steps:
Create Wireframes/Prototypes
Usability Testing
A/B Testing
Iterate Based on Feedback
Implement in Phases
# UX Audit and Rethink Report
**Product**: [Name]
**Date**: [Date]
**Auditor**: [AI Agent]
**Methodology**: IxDF UX Framework (7 Factors + 5 Usability Characteristics + 5 Interaction Dimensions)
---
## Executive Summary
### Overall UX Health Score: 62/100 (C Grade)
**Key Findings:**
- Product provides value (Useful, Valuable) but struggles with usability
- Major gaps in Findability and Error Tolerance
- Mobile experience significantly below standards
- Quick wins identified with high ROI
**Critical Priorities:**
1. Implement undo system (Error Tolerance)
2. Redesign navigation (Findability)
3. Optimize mobile experience (Physical Space dimension)
---
## 1. UX Factors Assessment (7 Factors)
### Factor Scores
| Factor | Score | Status | Priority |
|--------|-------|--------|----------|
| Useful | 4/5 | ✅ Good | Medium |
| Usable | 3/5 | ⚠️ Needs work | High |
| Findable | 2/5 | ❌ Poor | Critical |
| Credible | 4/5 | ✅ Good | Low |
| Desirable | 3/5 | ⚠️ Needs work | Medium |
| Accessible | 2/5 | ❌ Poor | High |
| Valuable | 4/5 | ✅ Good | Low |
**Total**: 22/35 (63%)
[Detailed analysis for each factor...]
---
## 2. Usability Characteristics Assessment
### Usability Scores
| Characteristic | Score | Status | Impact |
|---------------|-------|--------|--------|
| Effectiveness | 4/5 | ✅ Good | High |
| Efficiency | 3/5 | ⚠️ Needs work | High |
| Engagement | 3/5 | ⚠️ Needs work | Medium |
| Error Tolerance | 2/5 | ❌ Poor | Critical |
| Ease of Learning | 3/5 | ⚠️ Needs work | High |
**Total**: 15/25 (60%)
**Utility Assessment**: Features present match user needs ✅
**Usefulness**: Utility (Good) + Usability (Fair) = **Acceptable but improvable**
[Detailed analysis...]
---
## 3. Interaction Design Dimensions
### Dimension Scores
| Dimension | Score | Key Issues |
|-----------|-------|------------|
| Words | 3/5 | Technical jargon, inconsistent terminology |
| Visual Representations | 4/5 | Minor icon clarity issues |
| Physical Objects/Space | 2/5 | Poor mobile optimization, small targets |
| Time | 3/5 | Slow loading, missing progress indicators |
| Behavior | 3/5 | Weak feedback, inconsistent patterns |
**Total**: 15/25 (60%)
[Detailed analysis...]
---
## 4. Issues Identified
### Critical (P0) - Fix Immediately
**Issue 1: No Undo for Destructive Actions**
- Frameworks: Usability (Error Tolerance), UX (Usable)
- Impact: Data loss, user frustration, support burden
- Severity: Critical
- Effort: Medium (2-3 days)
- Recommendation: Implement 30s undo buffer + confirmations
[Continue for all P0 issues...]
### High Priority (P1) - Fix This Sprint
[List...]
### Medium Priority (P2) - Next Release
[List...]
### Low Priority (P3) - Backlog
[List...]
---
## 5. Redesign Proposals
### Proposal 1: Navigation Redesign
[Full proposal with wireframes...]
### Proposal 2: Error Tolerance System
[Full proposal...]
### Proposal 3: Mobile-First Redesign
[Full proposal...]
---
## 6. Research Recommendations
### Immediate Research Needs
1. **Usability Testing** (Week 1-2)
- 5-8 participants
- Tasks: [Key tasks]
- Goal: Validate findings
2. **User Interviews** (Week 2-3)
- Questions: [List]
- Goal: Deep dive on pain points
3. **Card Sorting** (Week 3)
- Goal: Redesign IA
- Method: Open card sort
### Analytics to Monitor
- Task completion rates
- Time on task
- Error rates
- Abandonment points
- Funnel drop-offs
---
## 7. Implementation Roadmap
### Phase 1: Critical Fixes (Weeks 1-2)
- Implement undo system
- Add prominent search
- Fix mobile touch targets
- **Expected Impact**: Error Tolerance 2→4, Findable 2→3
### Phase 2: Major Improvements (Weeks 3-6)
- Navigation redesign
- Mobile optimization
- Improved error messages
- **Expected Impact**: Usable 3→4, Mobile 2→4
### Phase 3: Polish (Weeks 7-10)
- Visual design refresh
- Micro-interactions
- Performance optimization
- **Expected Impact**: Desirable 3→4, Efficiency 3→4
### Success Metrics
- Overall UX score: 62 → 80+
- User satisfaction (SUS): [Current] → 75+
- Task completion: [Current] → 90%+
- Support tickets: -40%
---
## 8. Next Steps
1. **Stakeholder Review** (Week 0)
- Present findings
- Align on priorities
- Secure resources
2. **Prototyping** (Week 1)
- Create wireframes for proposals
- Get quick feedback
3. **User Testing** (Week 2)
- Validate assumptions
- Test prototypes
4. **Implementation** (Weeks 3+)
- Phased rollout
- Monitor metrics
- Iterate based on data
---
## Methodology Notes
- **Framework**: IxDF "The Basics of User Experience Design"
- **Standards**: 7 UX Factors + 5 Usability Characteristics + 5 Interaction Dimensions
- **Approach**: Expert review + heuristic evaluation + research recommendations
- **Limitations**: Simulated evaluation; validate with real users
- **Complement with**:
- Nielsen Heuristics for usability depth
- WCAG for accessibility compliance
- Cognitive Walkthrough for task-specific analysis
- UI Design Review for visual polish
---
## References
- Interaction Design Foundation - "The Basics of User Experience Design"
- Peter Morville - User Experience Honeycomb (7 Factors)
- ISO 9241-11 - Usability definition and metrics
- Gillian Crampton Smith & Kevin Silver - 5 Dimensions of Interaction Design
- Jakob Nielsen - Usability engineering principles
---
**Version**: 1.0
**Last Updated**: [Date]
Combine all three frameworks:
Total: 85 points possible
Grading:
When evaluating mobile:
This skill incorporates Design Thinking:
Empathize: Through user research and persona creation Define: By identifying problem statements from audit Ideate: Through redesign proposal brainstorming Prototype: By recommending wireframes and mockups Test: Through usability testing recommendations
1.0 - Initial release based on IxDF "The Basics of User Experience Design"
Remember: This holistic audit provides a comprehensive UX baseline. For deeper dives, follow up with specialized audits (Nielsen for usability, WCAG for accessibility, Cognitive Walkthrough for specific tasks, UI Design Review for visual polish).