make-release

name

make-release

description

Cut a new release of the okama Python package — runs the full release workflow (poetry update, pytest, nbmake notebook tests, ruff, sphinx docs, version bump, CHANGELOG, git tag on master, GitHub release, PyPI publish, post-release dev sync). Use whenever the user asks to release okama, ship a new okama version, publish okama to PyPI, cut a tag, or says any of "make release", "release okama", "release the library", "сделай релиз", "выпусти версию", "релиз окамы", "опубликуй на pypi" — even if they don't spell out every step. The skill enforces confirm gates before any irreversible action (push, merge, tag push, GitHub release, PyPI publish).

make-release — okama release workflow

This skill ships a new release of the okama Python package end-to-end. The workflow is intentionally rigid because release operations are irreversible (PyPI versions cannot be re-uploaded, pushed tags propagate to CI and Read the Docs). Run the phases in order and stop on the first failure unless the failure is auto-fixable by ruff --fix / ruff format.

The user has approved confirm gates at four points — these are non-negotiable, even if the user says "go ahead" earlier. Pause and ask before each:

1. before git push (and git push --tags)
2. before merging dev into master
3. before creating the GitHub Release
4. before poetry publish to PyPI

All other steps run without prompting unless they fail.

Working directory

The package lives at /home/chilango/pyprojects/okama_projects/okama. Run all commands from that directory. Verify with pwd if unsure — running poetry from a wrong directory silently uses the wrong env.

Environment: disable the keyring backend (WSL2 poetry hang)

On WSL2 (and other headless Linux without an unlocked Secret Service / D-Bus session), poetry can hang indefinitely on a keyring lookup — the process sits in do_epoll_wait at 0% CPU with no output, which is easily mistaken for slow dependency resolution. Observed on this laptop during the v2.2.2 release (2026-06-19): poetry update hung ~15 min with zero progress until killed.

Run every poetry command in this workflow with the keyring backend disabled, by prefixing it (shell env does not persist between steps):

PYTHON_KEYRING_BACKEND=keyring.backends.null.Keyring poetry <cmd>

This only skips the OS keyring; the PyPI token is still read from ~/.config/pypoetry/auth.toml (or env / config), so poetry publish works unchanged. The command blocks below already include the prefix — keep it. If any poetry command produces no output for more than a minute, suspect this hang first (kill it and retry with the prefix), rather than waiting it out.

Phase 0 — Preflight

Run these checks first. If any fails, stop and report — do not try to fix automatically.

# 1) On dev branch
test "$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)" = "dev" || echo "FAIL: not on dev"

# 2) Working tree clean
test -z "$(git status --porcelain)" || echo "FAIL: dirty tree"

# 3) gh CLI authenticated
gh auth status

# 4) PyPI token configured for poetry (poetry config OR auth.toml)
poetry config pypi-token.pypi 2>/dev/null | grep -q . \
  || grep -q '^\[pypi-token\]' ~/.config/pypoetry/auth.toml 2>/dev/null \
  || echo "FAIL: no pypi token"

# 5) Read the Docs API token available in .env
grep -q '^READTHEDOCS_TOKEN=' .env 2>/dev/null || echo "WARN: no RTD token — Phase 10 will be skipped"

.env is gitignored. The RTD token lets Phase 10 query and poll Read the Docs builds via the v3 API. If it is missing, the skill falls back to checking only the public docs URL.

PyPI-token false negative: poetry config pypi-token.pypi can print nothing even when the token is present and poetry publish works, because the token lives in ~/.config/pypoetry/auth.toml under a [pypi-token] section rather than in poetry's config store (observed during the v2.2.3 release, 2026-07). The check above therefore also accepts the auth.toml [pypi-token] section. If it still reports FAIL, confirm by inspecting ~/.config/pypoetry/auth.toml for a [pypi-token] entry (do not print its value) before stopping — a real absence, not a false negative, is what blocks Phase 11.

Phase 1 — poetry update

PYTHON_KEYRING_BACKEND=keyring.backends.null.Keyring poetry update

If anything in poetry.lock changes meaningfully, mention it in the release notes draft later.

Phase 2 — Tests

Both unit tests (pytest) and notebook tests (pytest --nbmake examples) are mandatory before any version bump. Notebook tests are the only thing that catches API drift in the user-facing examples — never skip them, even for a "doc-only" release.

2a. Install current dev source into the env

pytest --nbmake runs each notebook against a registered Jupyter kernel, and that kernel imports okama from the env. Without an explicit install the kernel may import a stale build of okama and miss the very changes you are about to release. Run poetry install first so the env reflects the current dev branch:

PYTHON_KEYRING_BACKEND=keyring.backends.null.Keyring poetry install

Confirm the installed version matches pyproject.toml (Installing the current project: okama (<NEW_VERSION>)).

2b. Resolve / register the Jupyter kernel

Derive the kernel name from the env's Python version — do not ask the user, and do not hardcode a kernel name. The convention is okama_poetry<MAJOR>.<MINOR> (e.g. okama_poetry3.14 for Python 3.14.x):

PYVER=$(poetry run python -c 'import sys; print(f"{sys.version_info.major}.{sys.version_info.minor}")')
KERNEL_NAME="okama_poetry${PYVER}"

Check whether that kernel is already registered against the poetry env:

poetry run python -c "from jupyter_client.kernelspec import KernelSpecManager; \
  ks=KernelSpecManager().get_all_specs(); print('FOUND' if '${KERNEL_NAME}' in ks else 'MISSING')"

If MISSING, register it from the poetry env so the kernel's python points at the okama venv:

poetry run python -m ipykernel install --user --name="${KERNEL_NAME}" --display-name="${KERNEL_NAME}"

If a stale kernel with a previous Python version exists (e.g. okama_poetry3.13 after a 3.14 upgrade), leave it alone unless the user asks — old kernels do not break anything, but uninstalling someone else's tooling without consent does.

2c. Run the tests

poetry run pytest -n=auto
poetry run pytest --nbmake --nbmake-kernel="${KERNEL_NAME}" -n=auto examples

If tests fail: stop. Report the failures to the user. Do not attempt fixes — the user will decide. (Per okama/AGENTS.md, retry at most twice if the fix is obvious — but during a release, prefer to stop and let the user decide whether to defer.)

Phase 3 — Lint & format

ruff issues are auto-fixable; apply fixes silently, then verify.

poetry run ruff check --fix .
poetry run ruff format .
poetry run ruff check .          # must exit 0
poetry run ruff format --check . # must exit 0
poetry run pre-commit run --all-files

If ruff check . still fails after --fix, or pre-commit reports issues that aren't auto-fixed: stop. Show the user the remaining diagnostics.

Phase 4 — Docs build

Sphinx docs live in docs/. Regenerate .rst from sources and build HTML.

cd docs
poetry run sphinx-apidoc -o source/ ../okama
poetry run python -m sphinx -b html . _build/html
cd ..

Stop on any sphinx error. Warnings about missing references in third-party packages are usually OK; new warnings introduced by this release are not.

This phase only validates that docs build locally. Read the Docs is verified separately in Phase 10, after the tag is pushed (RTD auto-builds on tag).

Phase 5 — Version bump

Read the current version from pyproject.toml (the version = "X.Y.Z" line under [tool.poetry] or [project]). Show it to the user and ask which bump to apply:

• patch — X.Y.Z → X.Y.(Z+1) (bug fixes, doc-only, dependency bumps)
• minor — X.Y.Z → X.(Y+1).0 (new features, no breaking changes)
• major — X.Y.Z → (X+1).0.0 (breaking changes)

The user picks. Then update pyproject.toml (single line edit). Do not edit any other version field — okama uses pyproject.toml as the single source of truth. The new version is <NEW_VERSION> for the rest of the workflow.

Phase 6 — Release notes & CHANGELOG

Generate a draft from git history since the last tag, then have the user edit it.

LAST_TAG=$(git describe --tags --abbrev=0)
git log --no-merges --pretty=format:"- %s (%h)" "$LAST_TAG"..HEAD

Group commits by Conventional Commit prefix into the four sections used in CHANGELOG.md:

• feat: / feat(...) → Added
• fix: → Fixed
• docs: / notebook updates → Docs
• everything else (chore:, style:, refactor:) → omit unless user-visible

Match the style of the existing ## [2.0.1] - 2026-04 section in CHANGELOG.md: brief lead paragraph describing the theme of the release, then the section headers. Reference classes and methods by name (e.g. `PortfolioDCF.wealth_index()`) — this is required by okama/AGENTS.md. Link notebooks under /examples with markdown links.

Show the draft to the user and let them edit before continuing. Insert the final block at the top of CHANGELOG.md under the title.

Then build the GitHub Release body — usually identical to the new CHANGELOG section, but follow the format of https://github.com/mbk-dev/okama/releases/tag/v2.0.0 if the user wants something richer. Save it to a temp file (e.g., /tmp/release_notes_v<NEW_VERSION>.md) for gh release create --notes-file later.

Phase 7 — Sync requirements.txt

If poetry update (Phase 1) changed any dependency versions, sync requirements.txt. Per okama/AGENTS.md, every dependency change must be reflected in both pyproject.toml and requirements.txt.

poetry export -f requirements.txt --output requirements.txt --without-hashes

If the export plugin is not installed, fall back to manually updating the changed lines.

Phase 8 — Commit on dev, push, merge into master, tag

This is the git-flow phase. The user approved this exact order: commit on dev → push dev → merge into master → tag on master → push tags.

# Stage & commit on dev
git add pyproject.toml CHANGELOG.md requirements.txt docs/
git commit -m "chore(release): prepare v<NEW_VERSION>"

CONFIRM GATE 1 — before git push. Show git log --oneline @{u}.. so the user can see what they are about to push. Only push after explicit approval.

git push

Wait for CI to go green (Travis CI + flake8/ruff). If the user says "skip waiting", note it in the report but proceed.

CONFIRM GATE 2 — before merging into master. Show the diff range:

git log --oneline master..dev

After approval:

git switch master
git pull
git merge --no-ff dev -m "Merge dev for v<NEW_VERSION>"
git tag "v<NEW_VERSION>"
git describe --tags  # sanity check: should print v<NEW_VERSION>

CONFIRM GATE 1 (again) — before pushing master and the tag. Pushed tags are very hard to remove cleanly:

git push
git push --tags

Phase 9 — GitHub Release

CONFIRM GATE 3 — before creating the GitHub Release. Show the user the --notes-file content one more time.

gh release create "v<NEW_VERSION>" \
  --title "v<NEW_VERSION>" \
  --notes-file /tmp/release_notes_v<NEW_VERSION>.md \
  --target master

If the user wants to mark it as a pre-release, add --prerelease.

Phase 10 — Read the Docs verification

The tag push in Phase 8 triggers a Read the Docs build for both the latest version (rebuilt on every master push) and the new version slug (e.g. v2.0.2). Verify the build succeeded before publishing to PyPI — a broken docs build usually means a real bug (import error, broken example) that PyPI users will hit too.

Load the token, then poll the API:

set -a; source .env; set +a   # exports READTHEDOCS_TOKEN

API="https://readthedocs.org/api/v3/projects/okama"
AUTH="Authorization: Token $READTHEDOCS_TOKEN"
SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)     # the merge commit on master

# Find the build for our commit; RTD usually creates it within 30s of the push
BUILD_ID=$(curl -s -H "$AUTH" "$API/builds/?limit=20" \
  | python3 -c "import json,sys,os; sha=os.environ['SHA']; \
       print(next((b['id'] for b in json.load(sys.stdin)['results'] if b['commit']==sha), ''))")

If BUILD_ID is empty, wait 30s and retry — RTD is sometimes slow to register the webhook. Give up after ~5 minutes and tell the user to check the dashboard manually.

Once the ID is found, poll until state is finished:

while :; do
  STATE=$(curl -s -H "$AUTH" "$API/builds/$BUILD_ID/" \
    | python3 -c "import json,sys; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(d['state']['code'], d['success'])")
  echo "$STATE"
  case "$STATE" in
    "finished True")  echo "RTD build OK"; break ;;
    "finished False") echo "RTD build FAILED"; exit 1 ;;
  esac
  sleep 30
done

If the build fails: stop. Show the user error and the build URL (https://app.readthedocs.org/projects/okama/builds/$BUILD_ID/). Do not proceed to PyPI — fix the docs first, push a fix to master, wait for the new build to pass, then resume from Phase 11.

If the build passes, also do a quick public-docs sanity check:

curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}\n" "https://okama.readthedocs.io/en/latest/"

Should be 200. Anything else (typically 404 or 5xx) is a CDN issue worth noting but not blocking.

For the new tagged version (v<NEW_VERSION>), RTD may keep it inactive by default. If https://okama.readthedocs.io/en/v<NEW_VERSION>/ returns 404 even after the build, mention it in the final report — the user activates the version in the RTD dashboard.

Phase 11 — PyPI publish

CONFIRM GATE 4 — before poetry publish. PyPI does not allow re-uploading the same version, even if you delete it. Once the publish succeeds, <NEW_VERSION> is permanent.

Build and publish as two separate steps — do not use the combined poetry publish --build. During the v2.2.1 release (2026-06-06) the combined command hung indefinitely before even producing artifacts (95% CPU for 20+ minutes, nothing in dist/), while the separate commands completed in seconds. Two steps also let you inspect the artifacts before the irreversible upload.

PYTHON_KEYRING_BACKEND=keyring.backends.null.Keyring poetry build      # writes okama-<NEW_VERSION>.tar.gz and .whl into dist/ — takes seconds
ls -la dist/                                                           # sanity check: both <NEW_VERSION> artifacts are present
PYTHON_KEYRING_BACKEND=keyring.backends.null.Keyring poetry publish    # uploads the current pyproject.toml version from dist/

If either command takes more than a couple of minutes, kill it and investigate — that is not normal for this package.

poetry publish uploads only the artifacts matching the current pyproject.toml version; stale files of older versions in dist/ are ignored (observed in the v2.2.1 release with v2.2.0 files present).

Verify by visiting https://pypi.org/project/okama/ and confirming the new version is listed, or query the JSON API:

curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/okama/json | python3 -c "import json,sys; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['info']['version'])"

Phase 12 — Post-release

Sync dev with master via fast-forward (the user explicitly chose this over delete-and-recreate).

git switch dev
git merge --ff-only master
git push

If --ff-only fails, dev has diverged from master post-merge — stop and ask the user how to handle it. Do not force-push, do not rebase without permission.

The Jupyter kernel was already registered in Phase 2b; no further kernel work is needed here.

Reporting

At the end, give the user a one-paragraph summary:

• new version
• tag name
• GitHub Release URL (from gh release view --json url -q .url)
• PyPI URL
• whether dev is fast-forwarded
• anything that was skipped or that needs manual follow-up (Read the Docs build, etc.)

Do not list every command that ran — the user does not need a transcript.

What NOT to do

• Do not run git push --force or git push --force-with-lease at any point in this workflow. If a push is rejected, stop and report.
• Do not amend a commit that has already been pushed. Make a new commit instead.
• Do not delete the dev branch (the user chose fast-forward over recreation).
• Do not skip pre-commit hooks with --no-verify (forbidden by the user's global rules).
• Do not bump dependencies "while we're at it" — the only dependency change in this workflow comes from poetry update in Phase 1.
• Do not modify main_notebook.ipynb (forbidden by okama/AGENTS.md).
• Do not write release notes or CHANGELOG entries in any language other than English (forbidden by okama/AGENTS.md).

Recovery

If something fails between phases 8–12, the state is partially-released. Tell the user exactly what completed and what didn't, then ask before any cleanup. Common partial states:

• Tagged locally, not pushed: git tag -d v<NEW_VERSION> is safe.
• Tag pushed, no GitHub Release: gh release create can still run, or delete the remote tag with git push --delete origin v<NEW_VERSION> (ask first).
• GitHub Release created, RTD build failed: do not publish to PyPI. Fix the docs on master, RTD will rebuild automatically on the next push; once green, resume from Phase 11.
• GitHub Release created, PyPI publish failed: do not delete the GitHub Release — fix the PyPI issue (auth, network) and rerun poetry build + poetry publish. PyPI will accept the same version only if the previous attempt did not actually upload.
• PyPI publish succeeded, post-release sync failed: the release is done; just finish Phase 12 manually.