| name | release |
| description | Cuts a new release of the Medito Flutter app — bumps the version in pubspec.yaml, runs prepare_release.sh to reorganise release_notes.txt, commits the changes, tags the commit, and pushes everything to origin. Use this whenever the user says "release", "cut a release", "release 3.x.x", "ship a new version", "tag a release", or otherwise indicates they want to publish a new version, even if they don't explicitly mention every step. |
| argument-hint | [version] |
Cut a new release of the Medito app. Follow the steps below in order — each step assumes the previous one succeeded.
1. Decide the new version
Version names are date-based: YYMM.D.N (two-digit year + zero-padded month as one component, then unpadded day, then a reissue suffix that starts at .0 — e.g. today's first release would be 2604.22.0). If a release already exists for today, the script bumps the suffix (e.g. 2604.22.1, then .2, etc.). The three-component shape is required: Flutter's pubspec parser rejects 2-component versions, and app stores reject 4+ part versions.
You no longer compute the version yourself or pass $ARGUMENTS through — prepare_release.sh derives it from date and existing git tags in step 4. If the user passed an explicit version in $ARGUMENTS, tell them the script now auto-derives and ask whether they actually want to override; only proceed with --force if they confirm.
Before continuing, fetch tags so the script sees what's already shipped:
git fetch --tags
If the latest existing tag is ahead of today's date (e.g. last tag is 2605.6.0 but today is 2605.2), the script will refuse to run without --force. That's the drift detector — surface the message to the user verbatim and only re-run with --force after explicit approval. With --force the script keeps the latest tag's date as the base and bumps the .N suffix.
Tell the user that the version will be derived in step 4 before doing anything destructive.
2. Pre-flight checks
Before making changes, confirm the repo is in a sane state:
git status --porcelain
If the worktree has any changes (modified, staged, or untracked), show the user the full output and ask them to confirm before proceeding. Don't block outright — untracked files like new skills or scratch notes can't end up in the release commit anyway (step 5 only stages pubspec.yaml and release_notes.txt explicitly). But the user should eyeball the list in case something important is lurking.
Also verify the tag doesn't already exist:
git tag -l <new-version>
If it does, stop and tell the user — this usually means the release was already cut.
3. Draft the release notes and have the user review them
The Unreleased section of release_notes.txt is what prepare_release.sh will move under the new version heading, so it needs to be accurate before step 4 runs. Don't skip this — shipping stale or empty release notes is the most common way this workflow goes wrong.
Invoke the update-release-notes skill (via the Skill tool) to populate Unreleased from recent commits. You can pass a commit count via arguments if the user mentioned one; otherwise let it use its default.
After that skill finishes, show the user the current Unreleased section (e.g. read release_notes.txt and quote the block) and ask them to confirm or edit before moving on. Wait for explicit approval — don't proceed to step 4 on silence.
If the user wants changes, either apply them yourself based on their feedback or let them edit the file directly and confirm when ready. Only continue once they've signed off on the notes.
4. Run prepare_release.sh and bump the build number
From the project root:
./prepare_release.sh
This script:
- Computes the new version from today's date and existing git tags (echoes
Computed version: <new-version>)
- Refuses to run if the latest tag is ahead of today's date — pass
--force only after the user has acknowledged the drift
- Rewrites the
version: line in pubspec.yaml to <new-version>+<existing-build>
- Copies the version to the clipboard
- Moves the
Unreleased entries in release_notes.txt under a new section headed with the version, leaving a fresh empty Unreleased at the top
After it runs, read the new version back from pubspec.yaml (grep "^version:" pubspec.yaml | sed 's/version: //' | cut -d'+' -f1) so later steps can reference it.
If the script prints No unreleased notes found — nothing to do., stop and ask the user whether to proceed anyway — usually you want notes in a release.
Then bump the build number. The build number (the integer after + in the version: line) must increment by exactly 1 on every release — prepare_release.sh preserves the existing build number, so you need to bump it yourself afterwards.
OLD_BUILD=$(grep "^version:" pubspec.yaml | sed 's/version: //' | cut -d'+' -f2)
NEW_BUILD=$((OLD_BUILD + 1))
sed -i '' "s/^version: .*/version: <new-version>+$NEW_BUILD/" pubspec.yaml
Confirm the result with grep "^version:" pubspec.yaml before continuing. E.g. 3.6.15+302390 → 3.6.16+302391.
5. Sanity-check the diff
Run:
git status --porcelain
git diff pubspec.yaml release_notes.txt
Only pubspec.yaml and release_notes.txt should have changed. If anything else is modified, stop and show the user before continuing.
6. Commit
Stage only the two expected files and commit:
git add pubspec.yaml release_notes.txt
git commit -m "chore: release <new-version>"
Do not use git add -A — if the pre-flight check missed something, we don't want to accidentally sweep it into the release commit.
7. Tag the commit
Tags in this repo use bare semver (no v prefix — check recent tags with git tag --sort=-creatordate | head if unsure). Tag the commit you just made:
git tag <new-version>
8. Push
Push the branch and the tag to origin:
git push
git push origin <new-version>
9. Choose deploy tracks and dispatch the workflow
The Build & Deploy workflow (.github/workflows/release.yml) is workflow_dispatch-only — pushing the tag does not auto-deploy. After the tag is pushed, ask the user which tracks to ship to using AskUserQuestion:
- Android:
internal, production, both, or none
- iOS:
testflight, appstore, both, or none
Then trigger the workflow against the new tag with the chosen inputs:
gh workflow run release.yml \
--ref <new-version> \
-f android_internal=<true|false> \
-f android_production=<true|false> \
-f ios_testflight=<true|false> \
-f ios_appstore=<true|false> \
-f paywall_env=live \
-f match_readonly=true
If the user chooses none for both platforms, skip the dispatch entirely and just report the tag was pushed without a build.
After dispatching, surface the run URL with gh run list --workflow=release.yml --limit 1 --json url,databaseId so the user can click through.
10. Report back
Tell the user concisely:
- The version that was released
- The commit SHA that was tagged
- That the tag has been pushed
- Which tracks were dispatched (or that no build was kicked off)
- The Actions run URL if a build was dispatched
Mention any deviations (e.g. "no unreleased notes, proceeded anyway because you said so"). Keep it short — the user can see the commit and tag themselves.
Failure handling
If any step fails partway through, stop and tell the user exactly what state the repo is in rather than trying to auto-recover. Reversing a release mid-flight usually requires judgement calls (e.g. git reset, git tag -d, force-push) that shouldn't be automated.
