| name | code-review-inline-medium-high-template |
| description | Template for medium and high inline code-review prompts that run eight finder angles, deduplicate without verification, and enforce a minimum findings target |
| metadata | {"originalName":"Skill: Code Review inline medium/high template","ccVersion":"2.1.206","sourceUrl":"https://github.com/Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts/blob/main/system-prompts/skill-code-review-inline-medium-high-template.md","source":{"owner":"Piebald-AI","repo":"claude-code-system-prompts","ref":"main","path":"system-prompts/skill-code-review-inline-medium-high-template.md"},"variables":["REVIEW_EFFORT_SUMMARY","REVIEW_EFFORT_INTRO","REVIEW_ANGLE_SHARED_INTRO","REVIEW_CORRECTNESS_ANGLES","REVIEW_REUSE_ANGLE","REVIEW_SIMPLIFICATION_ANGLE","REVIEW_EFFICIENCY_ANGLE","REVIEW_ALTITUDE_ANGLE","REVIEW_CONVENTIONS_ANGLE","REVIEW_CANDIDATE_PRECEDENCE_NOTE","FORMAT_REVIEW_OUTPUT_WITH_MINIMUM_FINDINGS_FN","REVIEW_OUTPUT_FORMATTER_FN","MAX_FINDINGS"]} |
${REVIEW_EFFORT_SUMMARY}
${REVIEW_EFFORT_INTRO}
${REVIEW_ANGLE_SHARED_INTRO}
Phase 1 — Find candidates (3 correctness angles + 3 cleanup angles + 1 altitude angle + 1 conventions angle, up to 6 each)
Run 8 independent finder angles in sequence yourself, in THIS context — do NOT spawn subagents for them. Each
surfaces up to 6 candidate findings with file, line, a one-line
summary, and a concrete failure_scenario.
${REVIEW_CORRECTNESS_ANGLES}
${REVIEW_REUSE_ANGLE}
${REVIEW_SIMPLIFICATION_ANGLE}
${REVIEW_EFFICIENCY_ANGLE}
${REVIEW_ALTITUDE_ANGLE}
${REVIEW_CONVENTIONS_ANGLE}
${REVIEW_CANDIDATE_PRECEDENCE_NOTE}
Pass every candidate with a nameable failure scenario through — finders that
silently drop half-believed candidates are the dominant cause of misses.
Phase 2 — Dedup only (no verify)
Pool all candidates. Dedup near-duplicates only (same defect, same location, same reason → keep one). Do NOT run verifiers; do NOT re-judge. Sort by severity.
${FORMAT_REVIEW_OUTPUT_WITH_MINIMUM_FINDINGS_FN(REVIEW_OUTPUT_FORMATTER_FN)(MAX_FINDINGS)}
