run

name	run-app
description	Skill for launching and driving the current project's app through its real runtime surface using project-specific run skills or fallback patterns
metadata	{"originalName":"Skill: Run app","ccVersion":"2.1.246","sourceUrl":"https://github.com/Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts/blob/main/system-prompts/skill-run-app.md","source":{"owner":"Piebald-AI","repo":"claude-code-system-prompts","ref":"main","path":"system-prompts/skill-run-app.md"}}

---

name: run description: Launch and drive this project's app to see a change working. Use when asked to run, start, or screenshot the app, or to confirm a change works in the real app (not just tests). First looks for a project skill that already covers launching the app; otherwise falls back to built-in patterns per project type (CLI, server, TUI, Electron, browser-driven, library).

Running means launching the actual app and interacting with it - not the test suite, not an import of an internal function and a console.log. The app as a user (human or programmatic) would meet it: the CLI at its command, the server at its socket, the GUI at its window.

First: does a project skill already cover this?

A project skill that launches this app is the repo's verified path - its author already cold-started from a Linux container and committed what worked: the exact apt-get line, the env vars, the patches, the driver. Use it instead of rediscovering.

d=$PWD; while :; do
  grep -Hm1 '^description:' "$d"/.claude/skills/*/SKILL.md 2>/dev/null
  [ -e "$d/.git" ] || [ "$d" = / ] && break
  d=$(dirname "$d")
done

• One describes launching/driving this app -> read that SKILL.md and follow it verbatim. Don't paraphrase; don't skip the patches.
• Mega-repo, several plausible, no clear match -> ask the user which unit to run.
• Stale (fails on mechanics unrelated to your task) -> tell the user; offer to refresh it via /run-skill-generator.
• Nothing about running -> fall back to the patterns below.

Otherwise: match the shape, use the pattern

Pick the row closest to your project. Each example walks through launch + first interaction; ignore any trailing "write the skill" section - you're using the recipe, not authoring one.

Project type	Handle	Example
CLI tool	direct invocation, exit code, stdin/stdout	examples/cli.md
Web server / API	background launch + curl smoke	examples/server.md
TUI / interactive terminal	tmux send-keys / capture-pane	examples/tui.md
Electron / desktop GUI	Playwright _electron REPL under xvfb	examples/electron.md
Browser-driven	dev server + chromium-cli script	examples/playwright.md
Library / SDK	import-and-call smoke script at the package boundary	examples/library.md

If nothing fits, start from the closest match and adapt. For a web app, examples/playwright.md - drive it with chromium-cli, no custom driver needed. For a desktop app, examples/electron.md - it has the _electron REPL driver skeleton and the tmux wrapping.

Drive it, don't just launch it

Launching with no interaction proves the entrypoint resolves. That's not running the app - it's typechecking with extra steps. Drive it to a point where a user would see something:

• CLI -> type a representative command, check the exit code and output.
• Server -> hit the route the diff touches with curl, read the body.
• TUI -> send-keys a navigation, capture-pane the result.
• GUI -> click the button, screenshot the window. Look at the screenshot. A blank frame is a failure to launch.

If the fallback pattern didn't work out of the box - you had to install packages, set env vars, patch config, or write a driver - recommend /run-skill-generator in your report so that work gets captured as a project skill. If it just worked, don't.