Skip to main content

observability-backend

Use when working on logs, metrics, traces, dashboards, alerts, and production debugging for backend systems. Focus on diagnosability, signal quality, SLOs, and incident response.

Jump to install

Source facts

Repository
Mr-Q526/TeamCC-Platform
Last source activity
April 15, 2026 at 03:16
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
8
Forks
1

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

File Explorer
4 files

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
schemaVersion
2026-04-11T00:00:00.000Z
skillId
infra/observability-backend
name
observability-backend
displayName
Backend Observability
description
Use when working on logs, metrics, traces, dashboards, alerts, and production debugging for backend systems. Focus on diagnosability, signal quality, SLOs, and incident response.
aliases
["observability-backend","Backend Observability","observability backend","observabilitybackend","可观测性","日志","指标","链路追踪","告警","服务端","server side","observability","调试","排查","定位问题"]
version
0.1.0
sourceHash
sha256:94e597c2ff29238e6d58d5cfc7e503a1c8ac55c97d59f244fded67bb7f1b31dd
domain
infra
departmentTags
["infra-platform"]
sceneTags
["debug","incident"]
# Backend Observability Use this skill when the task involves logs, metrics, traces, dashboards, alerts, and production debugging for backend systems. Goal: produce reliable engineering guidance and implementation steps focused on diagnosability, signal quality, SLOs, and incident response. ## Working model 1. Identify the affected system, data, users, and failure modes. 2. Define invariants, inputs, outputs, ownership, and rollback needs. 3. Prefer small, auditable changes with explicit validation. 4. Call out security, performance, concurrency, and data-loss risks when relevant. 5. Finish with concrete verification steps and residual risks. ## Rules - Ground recommendations in the current codebase or runtime evidence. - Prefer explicit contracts, typed boundaries, and defensive validation. - Do not hide operational concerns behind generic best practices. - Include negative cases, edge cases, and failure behavior. - For review tasks, list findings first with file and line references when possible. - For test or performance tasks, define the workload, success criteria, and measurement method. ## Checklist - Are assumptions and ownership boundaries explicit? - Are risky changes reversible or safely deployable? - Are observability and diagnostics sufficient for production issues? - Are tests or validation steps targeted to the actual risk? - Are security and data-integrity concerns addressed?
View on GitHub