triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework

Triage and prioritize vulnerabilities using CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree framework to produce actionable remediation priorities. Use when working with triaging vulnerabilities with ssvc framework.

Jump to install

Repository: oyi77/1ai-skills
Last source activity: July 31, 2026 at 15:22
Detected SKILL.md language: English
Stars: 8
Forks: 0

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Back to search Back to installation

name	triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework
description	Triage and prioritize vulnerabilities using CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree framework to produce actionable remediation priorities. Use when working with triaging vulnerabilities with ssvc framework.
domain	cybersecurity
subdomain	vulnerability-management
tags	["ssvc","vulnerability-triage","cisa","vulnerability-prioritization","decision-tree","cvss","remediation","risk-management"]
version	1.0
author	oyi77
license	Apache-2.0
nist_csf	["ID.RA-01","ID.RA-02","ID.IM-02","ID.RA-06"]

Triaging Vulnerabilities with SSVC Framework

Overview

The Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) framework, developed by Carnegie Mellon University's Software Engineering Institute (SEI) in collaboration with CISA, provides a structured decision-tree methodology for vulnerability prioritization. Unlike CVSS alone, SSVC accounts for exploitation status, technical impact, automatability, mission prevalence, and public well-being impact to produce one of four actionable outcomes: Track, Track*, Attend, or Act.

When to Use

Trigger phrases:

"triaging vulnerabilities with ssvc framework"
"Triage and prioritize vulnerabilities using CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerab"
When managing security operations that require triaging vulnerabilities with ssvc framework
When improving security program maturity and operational processes
When establishing standardized procedures for security team workflows
When integrating threat intelligence or vulnerability data into operations

Prerequisites

Python 3.9+ with requests, pandas, and jinja2 libraries
Access to CISA KEV catalog API and EPSS API from FIRST
NVD API key (optional, for higher rate limits)
Vulnerability scan results from tools like OpenVAS, Nessus, or Qualys

SSVC Decision Points

This section covers ssvc decision points for triaging vulnerabilities with ssvc framework.

Ensure all prerequisites are met before proceeding
Follow the documented workflow steps in sequence
Record results and any anomalies encountered during this phase

1. Exploitation Status

Assess current exploitation activity:

None - No evidence of active exploitation
PoC - Proof-of-concept exists publicly
Active - Active exploitation observed in the wild (check CISA KEV)

# Check if a CVE is in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog
curl -s "https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/feeds/known_exploited_vulnerabilities.json" | \
  python3 -c "import sys,json; data=json.load(sys.stdin); cves=[v['cveID'] for v in data['vulnerabilities']]; print('Active' if 'CVE-2024-3400' in cves else 'Check PoC/None')"

Outcome	Action Required	SLA
Track	Monitor, remediate in normal patch cycle	90 days
Track*	Monitor closely, prioritize in next patch window	60 days
Attend	Escalate to senior management, accelerate remediation	14 days
Act	Apply mitigations immediately, executive-level awareness	48 hours

import requests
import json

# Fetch CISA KEV catalog
kev_url = "https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/feeds/known_exploited_vulnerabilities.json"
kev_data = requests.get(kev_url).json()
kev_cves = {v['cveID'] for v in kev_data['vulnerabilities']}

# Fetch EPSS scores for context
epss_url = "https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss"
epss_response = requests.get(epss_url, params={"cve": "CVE-2024-3400"}).json()

def evaluate_exploitation(cve_id, kev_set):
    """Determine exploitation status from CISA KEV and EPSS data."""
    if cve_id in kev_set:
        return "active"
    epss = requests.get(
        "https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss",
        params={"cve": cve_id}
    ).json()
    if epss.get("data"):
        score = float(epss["data"][0].get("epss", 0))
        if score > 0.5:
            return "poc"
    return "none"

def evaluate_technical_impact(cvss_vector):
    """Parse CVSS vector for scope and impact metrics."""
    if "S:C" in cvss_vector or "C:H/I:H/A:H" in cvss_vector:
        return "total"
    return "partial"

def evaluate_automatability(cvss_vector, cve_description):
    """Check if attack vector is network-based with low complexity."""
    if "AV:N" in cvss_vector and "AC:L" in cvss_vector and "UI:N" in cvss_vector:
        return "yes"
    return "no"

def ssvc_decision(exploitation, tech_impact, automatability, mission_prevalence, public_wellbeing):
    """CISA SSVC decision tree implementation."""
    if exploitation == "active":
        if tech_impact == "total" or automatability == "yes":
            return "Act"
        if mission_prevalence in ("essential", "support"):
            return "Act"
        return "Attend"
    if exploitation == "poc":
        if automatability == "yes" and tech_impact == "total":
            return "Attend"
        if mission_prevalence == "essential":
            return "Attend"
        return "Track*"
    # exploitation == "none"
    if tech_impact == "total" and mission_prevalence == "essential":
        return "Track*"
    return "Track"

# Run the SSVC triage script against scan results
python3 scripts/process.py --input scan_results.csv --output ssvc_triage_report.json

# View summary
cat ssvc_triage_report.json | python3 -m json.tool | head -50

# Export Nessus scan as CSV, then process
python3 scripts/process.py \
  --input nessus_export.csv \
  --format nessus \
  --output ssvc_results.json

# Export OpenVAS results as XML
python3 scripts/process.py \
  --input openvas_report.xml \
  --format openvas \
  --output ssvc_results.json

# Test SSVC decision logic with known CVEs
python3 -c "
from scripts.process import ssvc_decision
# CVE-2024-3400 - Palo Alto PAN-OS command injection (KEV listed)
assert ssvc_decision('active', 'total', 'yes', 'essential', 'material') == 'Act'
# CVE-2024-21887 - Ivanti Connect Secure (PoC available)
assert ssvc_decision('poc', 'total', 'yes', 'support', 'minimal') == 'Attend'
print('All SSVC decision tests passed')
"

Rationalization	Reality
"We are too small to be targeted"	Automated attacks target everyone. Size does not matter.
"Security slows us down"	A breach slows you down 100x more. Build security in from the start.
"We will fix it after launch"	Vulnerabilities in production are exploited within hours. Fix before deploy.