| name | aidd-service |
| description | Enforces asynchronous data service authoring best practices. Use when creating front-end or back-end services, service interfaces, Observe patterns, AsyncDataService, or when the user asks about service layer, data flow, unidirectional UI, or action/observable design. |
Service authoring
Asynchronous data services. Live in the services/ layer per structure. Adhere to namespace for type and function organization.
Data = readonly JSON values or Blobs.
Front-end vs back-end services
FrontEndService {
allowed: ["Observe<Data>", "other services (sub-Services)", "void-returning action functions"]
notAllowed: ["Promise or AsyncGenerator return"]
}
BackEndService {
typicallyReturns: "Promise<Data> | AsyncGenerator<Data>"
notCalledFrom: "UI"
calledBy: "front-end services"
}
Constraints {
UI components: unidirectional path — data down via void actions, data up via Observe
}
Back-end services — usually stateless. Functions typically return Promise<Data> or AsyncGenerator<Data>. Not called directly from UI; front-end services call them.
Front-end service constraints
ServiceInterfaceForUI {
mayContain: [
"Observe<Data> — observable properties or factories",
"Sub-Services — nested service interfaces",
"Action functions — zero or more Data arguments, return void only",
"Factory functions — create observables or sub-Services"
]
observablesMayObserve: ["Data", "Service interfaces only"]
compileTimeCheck: "Assert<AsyncDataService.IsValid<ServiceInterface>>"
}
Benefits
- Unidirectional flow — data down via actions, data up via Observe
- Async isolation — view and service decoupled
- Inspectability — action/observable data serializable
- Portability — implementation swappable across process boundaries
- Lazy Loading - can use AsyncDataService.createLazy to wrap with lazy load on first actual usage.
Folder structure
ServicePaths {
"services/<name>-service/<name>-service.ts" = "Service interface only"
"services/<name>-service/<function-name>.ts" = "One file per function; re-export from public"
"services/<name>-service/<implementation>-<name>-service.ts" = "Implementation factory"
"services/<name>-service/<implementation>-<name>-service/" = "Implementation folder if multi-file"
}
Constraints {
Each function lives in its own file — not a single -service-functions.ts
Interface file: types and optionally JSON schemas only; no implementation-specific code
Implementation: factory function or static plain object only; no classes
Namespace: export * as ServiceName from public.js or from functions/index.js
}
Per namespace, each function lives in its own file — not a single -service-functions.ts.
Interface file — types and optionally JSON schemas only. No implementation-specific code. Follow namespace for type re-exporting (single import surface for consumers).
Implementation — factory function or static plain object. Export only that. No classes — brittle this bindings, violate pure functional design, block recomposing higher-order services from functions.
Namespace — export * as ServiceName from './public.js'; public.ts re-exports create and helpers. Or export * as ServiceName from './functions/index.js' when using a functions module. Per namespace.
Execute
fn whenCreatingOrModifyingService() {
Constraints {
Place in services/<name>-service/ per structure
Interface in <name>-service.ts — types only, extend Service, add Assert<AsyncDataService.IsValid<>>
Export namespace from public.js or functions/index.js
In public.ts re-export create and all public helpers
Implementation in <implementation>-<name>-service.ts or folder — factory or static instance only
Front-end (UI-called): actions return void only; observables observe Data or Service only
Back-end: functions return Promise<Data> or AsyncGenerator<Data>
}
}
Additional resources
- observe — Observe pattern and helper functions