- name
- cc-skill-strategic-compact
- compatibility
- opencode
- completeness
- 95
- content-types
- ["guidance","examples","do-dont"]
- description
- Implements intelligent cc skill strategic compact with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense
- license
- MIT
- maturity
- stable
- metadata
- {"domain":"agent","output-format":"analysis","related-skills":"agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing","role":"orchestration","scope":"orchestration","triggers":"cc-skill-strategic-compact, cc skill strategic compact, how do i cc-skill-strategic-compact, orchestrate cc-skill-strategic-compact, automate cc-skill-strategic-compact, agent cc-skill-strategic-compact","archetypes":["orchestration","strategic"],"anti_triggers":["brainstorming","vague ideation","single-agent monolith"],"response_profile":{"verbosity":"medium","directive_strength":"high","abstraction_level":"tactical"}}
- version
- 1.0.0
# Cc Skill Strategic Compact
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for cc skill strategic compact workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Orchestration Flow │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Parse Request │
│ & Extract │
│ Features │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Evaluate Available Skills │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │
│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │
│ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │
│ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │
│ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ Select Best Skill │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Execute Skill │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Handle Result │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Error Handling & Fallback │
│ │
│ Success? ────────► Return Result │
│ │
│ Fail? ────────┐ │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Fallback Chain │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │
│ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │
│ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │
│ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
## When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
## Core Workflow
1. **Parse and Analyze Request** - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input.
**Checkpoint:** All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
2. **Score Available Skills** - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
**Checkpoint:** Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
3. **Select Optimal Skill** - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence.
**Checkpoint:** Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
4. **Execute with Fallback** - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic.
**Checkpoint:** Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
5. **Return or Fallback** - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from `related-skills`
- Defer to human operator for critical tasks
**Checkpoint:** Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
## Implementation Patterns
### Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
```python
def evaluate_strategic_compact(
task_context: Dict[str, Any],
available_compacts: List[Dict[str, Any]],
min_confidence: float = 0.75
) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:
"""Evaluate available skill compacts against the current task context.
Implements Law 2 (Make Illegal States Unrepresentable) by validating
compact schemas before scoring. Uses multi-factor scoring to determine
the optimal strategic compact for the request.
"""
if not task_context.get("intent") or not available_compacts:
raise ValueError("Task intent and available compacts are required")
task_features = _extract_intent_features(task_context["intent"])
best_compact = None
best_score = 0.0
for compact in available_compacts:
# Law 1: Early exit for disabled/deprecated compacts
if compact.get("status") in ("disabled", "deprecated"):
continue
match_score = _calculate_text_similarity(task_features, compact.get("triggers", []))
history_score = compact.get("historical_success_rate", 0.0)
availability_score = 1.0 if compact.get("health") == "healthy" else 0.5
composite_score = (match_score * 0.5) + (history_score * 0.3) + (availability_score * 0.2)
if composite_score > best_score and composite_score >= min_confidence:
best_score = composite_score
best_compact = compact
if best_compact is None:
return None
# Law 3: Atomic Predictability - return fresh dict
return {
"compact_id": best_compact["id"],
"confidence": best_score,
"selected_at": time.time(),
"fallback_chain": best_compact.get("fallbacks", [])
}
```
### Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
```python
def execute_compact_with_fallback(
compact_config: Dict[str, Any],
execution_context: Dict[str, Any],
max_retries: int = 2
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Execute a strategic compact with built-in resilience patterns.
Follows Law 4 (Fail Fast, Fail Loud) by immediately halting on
invalid state errors and routing transient failures through the
configured fallback chain.
"""
if not compact_config.get("steps"):
raise CompactExecutionError("Compact must define at least one execution step")
validated_context = _validate_compact_inputs(execution_context, compact_config)
attempt = 0
while attempt <= max_retries:
try:
result = _run_compact_steps(compact_config["steps"], validated_context)
return {
"status": "success",
"compact_id": compact_config["id"],
"output": result,
"attempts": attempt + 1,
"latency_ms": time.time() * 1000
}
except InvalidStateError as e:
# Law 4: Fail immediately on invalid state
raise CompactExecutionError(f"Invalid state in compact {compact_config['id']}: {e}") from e
except TransientError as e:
attempt += 1
if attempt > max_retries:
return _apply_compact_fallback(compact_config, validated_context)
# Fallback exhausted
return {
"status": "fallback_triggered",
"compact_id": compact_config["id"],
"fallback_result": _route_to_human_operator(compact_config, validated_context)
}
```
### MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference `code-philosophy` (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
### MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
## TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
## Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
1. **Selected Skills** - List of skill names with confidence scores
2. **Selection Rationale** - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
3. **Execution Plan** - Order of execution with dependencies
4. **Fallback Strategy** - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
5. **Risk Assessment** - Any potential failure points and their impact
6. **Timing Estimates** - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
---
---
## Constraints
### MUST DO
- Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
- Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
- Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
- Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing
### MUST NOT DO
- Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
- Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
- Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
- Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies
## Live References
> Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.
- [Strategic Management Theory (Porter's Five Forces)](<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Forces_Analysis>)
- [Business Model Canvas (Strategyzer)](<https://www.strategyzer.com/canvas/business-model-canvas>)
- [OKR Framework Guide (Google)](<https://www.atlassian.com/agile/project-management/okrs>)
- [Decision Matrix Methods](<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-criteria_decision_analysis>)
- [SWOT Analysis in Strategic Planning](<https://hbr.org/1985/07/how-to-assess-your-company-strengths-and-weaknesses>)
## Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose |
|
View on GitHub