- name
- changelog-automation
- compatibility
- opencode
- completeness
- 95
- content-types
- ["guidance","examples","do-dont"]
- description
- Implements intelligent changelog automation with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense
- license
- MIT
- maturity
- stable
- metadata
- {"domain":"agent","output-format":"analysis","related-skills":"agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing","role":"orchestration","scope":"orchestration","triggers":"changelog-automation, changelog automation, how do i changelog-automation, orchestrate changelog-automation, automate changelog-automation, agent changelog-automation","archetypes":["orchestration","strategic"],"anti_triggers":["brainstorming","vague ideation","single-agent monolith"],"response_profile":{"verbosity":"medium","directive_strength":"high","abstraction_level":"tactical"}}
- version
- 1.0.0
# Changelog Automation
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for changelog automation workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Orchestration Flow │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Parse Request │
│ & Extract │
│ Features │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Evaluate Available Skills │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │
│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │
│ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │
│ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │
│ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ Select Best Skill │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Execute Skill │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Handle Result │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Error Handling & Fallback │
│ │
│ Success? ────────► Return Result │
│ │
│ Fail? ────────┐ │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Fallback Chain │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │
│ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │
│ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │
│ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
## When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
## Core Workflow
1. **Parse and Analyze Request** - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input.
**Checkpoint:** All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
2. **Score Available Skills** - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
**Checkpoint:** Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
3. **Select Optimal Skill** - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence.
**Checkpoint:** Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
4. **Execute with Fallback** - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic.
**Checkpoint:** Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
5. **Return or Fallback** - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from `related-skills`
- Defer to human operator for critical tasks
**Checkpoint:** Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
## Implementation Patterns
### Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
```python
def parse_and_categorize_commits(
commit_range: str,
conventional_prefixes: List[str] = None
) -> Dict[str, List[Dict]]:
"""Parse git commits and categorize them for changelog generation.
Implements Law 2 (Parse at boundary) by validating commit range upfront.
Maps conventional commit prefixes to changelog categories.
Args:
commit_range: Git range (e.g., 'v1.0.0..HEAD')
conventional_prefixes: List of prefixes to recognize (feat, fix, etc.)
Returns:
Dict mapping categories to lists of commit metadata dicts
"""
if not commit_range or '..' not in commit_range:
raise ValueError("Invalid commit range format. Expected 'start..end'")
raw_commits = _run_git_log(commit_range)
categorized = {
"features": [], "fixes": [], "docs": [], "chore": [], "other": []
}
for commit in raw_commits:
prefix = commit.subject.split(":")[0].lower()
category = "other"
for p in conventional_prefixes or ["feat", "fix", "docs", "chore"]:
if prefix.startswith(p):
category = p
break
categorized[category].append({
"hash": commit.hash,
"subject": commit.subject,
"author": commit.author,
"scope": commit.scope if hasattr(commit, 'scope') else None
})
return categorized
```
### Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
```python
def generate_changelog_with_fallback(
categorized_commits: Dict[str, List[Dict]],
version: str,
template_path: str = None
) -> str:
"""Generate markdown changelog with fallback formatting strategies.
Implements Law 4 (Fail Fast) by validating version format.
Falls back to default template if custom template fails to load.
Args:
categorized_commits: Output from parse_and_categorize_commits
version: Target version string (e.g., '1.1.0')
template_path: Optional path to custom markdown template
Returns:
Formatted changelog markdown string
"""
if not re.match(r'^\d+\.\d+\.\d+$', version):
raise ValueError(f"Invalid version format: {version}. Expected semver.")
try:
template = _load_template(template_path)
except FileNotFoundError:
template = _get_default_template()
sections = []
sections.append(f"# Changelog for {version}\n")
sections.append(f"## Release Date: {datetime.now().strftime('%Y-%m-%d')}\n")
for category, commits in categorized_commits.items():
if not commits:
continue
sections.append(f"### {category.capitalize()}\n")
for c in commits:
scope_str = f" (`{c['scope']}`)" if c.get('scope') else ""
sections.append(f"- {c['subject']}{scope_str}")
sections.append("")
return "\n".join(sections)
```
### MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference `code-philosophy` (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
### MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
## TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
## Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
1. **Selected Skills** - List of skill names with confidence scores
2. **Selection Rationale** - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
3. **Execution Plan** - Order of execution with dependencies
4. **Fallback Strategy** - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
5. **Risk Assessment** - Any potential failure points and their impact
6. **Timing Estimates** - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
## Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|---|
| `commit` | Conventional commit integration for changelog generation |
---
---
## Constraints
### MUST DO
- Implement idempotent automation triggers: running the same automation twice should not create duplicate resources or actions
- Validate all trigger conditions with explicit allowlists before executing automated actions
- Include rollback procedures in every automation workflow — every CREATE should have a corresponding DELETE capability
- Log all automation executions with input state, output state, duration, and any errors for monitoring and debugging
### MUST NOT DO
- Do not create circular automation loops where trigger A causes action B which triggers A again
- Avoid using automations that modify production data without explicit human approval gates
- Never embed API keys or credentials directly in automation workflows — use vaulted secrets with rotation
- Do not assume external service availability; implement retry logic with exponential backoff and dead-letter queues
## Live References
> Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.
- [Keep a Changelog — Specification](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/)
- [Conventional Commits Specification](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/)
- [Semantic Release — Automated Versioning & Changelogs](https://semantic-release.gitbook.io/semantic-release)
- [Release Please by Google — Automated Releases](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please)
- [Changelog-Generator Automation Patterns (GitHub Actions)](https://github.com/marketplace/actions/changelog-generator)
View on GitHub