00-client-intake

name	00-client-intake
description	Use when producing or reviewing the 00 client intake component of a business plan; applies its specialist evidence, decisions, and acceptance tests instead of neighbouring pipeline skills.
metadata	{"portable":true,"compatible_with":["claude-code","codex"]}

Client Intake Two-Phase Kickstart

Use When

• Use at the start of every new business-plan, proposal, feasibility, or funding engagement.
• Use when the business context is still incomplete and the rest of the suite would otherwise be forced to guess.
• Use before invoking section skills so the plan starts from a coherent intake baseline.

Do Not Use When

• Do not use after a high-quality project brief and assumptions baseline already exist.
• Do not use as a replacement for market validation, financial modelling, or due diligence.
• Do not use to fabricate missing client data; surface the gaps explicitly instead.

Required Inputs

• Business name, concept, sector, and country if known
• Founder or client answers to the 10 standard intake questions
• Funder or output type if already known: bank, investor, DFI, grant, proposal
• Any existing documents, rough notes, decks, financials, or proposals to mine for context

Workflow

1. Run the 10 standard intake questions exactly as defined.
2. Convert the answers into a draft project brief with clear [TO CONFIRM] markers.
3. Identify what is still missing for strategy, market, operations, team, finance, and funding logic.
4. Generate targeted follow-up questions specific to the current gaps.
5. Classify the engagement by audience and likely workflow path.
6. Hand off a clean intake baseline to the section and meta skills.

Quality Bar

• The intake captures enough context to prevent generic section drafting.
• Unknowns are clearly labelled rather than silently assumed.
• The project brief is structured so later skills can reuse it directly.
• Follow-up questions are specific to this business, not a generic survey.

Anti-Patterns

• Jumping into section drafting before the intake baseline exists.
• Asking vague catch-all questions instead of targeted clarifying questions.
• Collapsing real uncertainty into false certainty.
• Leaving funder type, country context, or business stage implicit.

Outputs

• A draft project brief or intake summary
• A list of unresolved assumptions and information gaps
• Targeted follow-up questions
• A recommended downstream skill path

Standardise every new engagement with a structured intake process. Phase 1 presents 10 fixed questions and converts the answers into a draft project brief. Phase 2 generates targeted follow-up questions specific to this client's gaps.

---

Phase 1 The 10 Standard Questions

Present these questions exactly as written. Do not split, reorder, or merge them. The client answers in free-form prose.

---

Question 1 Your Business Tell us about your business in your own words. What does it do, how long has it been operating (or is it a new idea), what sector is it in, where is it based, how many people are involved, and what is its legal structure for example, a sole trader, partnership, limited company, or co-operative? If the business already has a name, please include it.

---

Question 2 The Problem You Are Solving What problem or gap in the market does your business address? Who is experiencing this problem and why are they not being served well today? What made you identify this opportunity — personal experience, research, or a gap you observed — and why is now the right time to act on it?

---

Question 3 Your Product or Service Describe what your business offers in plain language. How does it work, from the customer's point of view? Is it still an idea, a prototype, an early version you are testing, or something you are already selling? What are the most important features or components, and what makes it work the way it does?

---

Question 4 Your Customers Who are your customers? Describe the kind of person or organisation that would buy from you their age, location, income level, or type of business if it is a business-to-business sale. How many potential customers do you believe exist, even roughly? Is your market local, national, or international? Have you already sold to anyone, and if so, who?

---

Question 5 How You Make Money How does your business earn revenue? Walk us through your pricing what you charge, how you decided on that price, and whether customers pay once or on a recurring basis. Through what channels do you sell for example, a physical shop, agents, online, direct sales? Do you have any sales already, and if so, what do those numbers look like?

---

Question 6 Your Competition Who else is offering something similar to your target customers, whether directly or as an alternative? Why would a customer choose you over them? Do you have anything that gives you a lasting advantage a unique process, a relationship, intellectual property, a location, a cost advantage, or exclusive access to something? Are there any well-known brands or large players in this space?

---

Question 7 Your Finances What is the current financial position of the business is it earning revenue, breaking even, or pre-revenue? Has the business received any funding, loans, or investment to date, and if so, how much and from whom? How much funding are you looking for now, and what specifically would you use it for? Do you have any existing financial projections, even rough ones, that you can share?

---

Question 8 What You Need From Us What document are we producing for you? For example: a full business plan, an investor pitch deck, a bank loan proposal, a grant application, a feasibility study, or an executive summary. Who will read it a bank loan officer, an investor, a grant committee, a government body, a board of directors? When do you need it, and are there any format requirements or word limits we should know about?

---

Question 9 The People Behind the Business Who are the key people running this business founders, directors, or senior managers? What is their relevant background, qualifications, or experience? Are there any obvious skill gaps in the team right now, and if so, how do you plan to fill them? Do you have any advisors, board members, or mentors supporting the business?

---

Question 10 Anything That Affects What We Can Write Is there anything we need to know before we start that affects what can be included in this document or how it is presented? For example: your sector may be regulated and require specific licences; you may have applied for funding before and been turned down; there may be a partner, investor, or stakeholder who must approve the plan before it is submitted; there may be information you consider confidential; or there may be any other unusual circumstances we should be aware of.

---

Phase 1 Output Draft Project Brief

Immediately on receiving the 10 answers, generate a project brief structured into the 12 sections below. Do not withhold the brief pending clarification. Where an answer is missing or strategically ambiguous, insert the marker [TO CONFIRM]. Populate every section from the answers given, even where partial.

---

DRAFT PROJECT BRIEF

Client: [Business name from Q1 or "Not yet stated"] Date: [Today's date] Status: Draft pending Phase 2 follow-up

---

1. Business Overview

Summarise the business name, sector, stage of development, legal structure, location, and team size. Note the founding year or intended launch date. Flag any contradictions (e.g., described as "startup" but has three years of trading history).

2. Problem and Opportunity

State the market gap or problem being addressed, who is experiencing it, and the client's evidence or insight behind the opportunity. Include the "why now" reasoning if provided. Mark any claim that appears unsupported with [TO CONFIRM evidence basis].

3. Product or Service Description

Describe the offering in plain language, including its stage of development (idea / prototype / MVP / trading), key features, and how it works for the customer. Note if no clear differentiation has been stated.

4. Target Market

Identify the primary customer segments, geographic scope, B2B or B2C orientation, and any market-size figures provided. If no market size was stated, insert [TO CONFIRM market size estimate needed].

5. Revenue Model and Sales Channels

State the pricing model, sales channels, transaction type (one-off or recurring), and any revenue figures already achieved. If pricing logic is absent, insert [TO CONFIRM pricing rationale].

6. Competitive Landscape and Advantage

Name any competitors mentioned. Summarise the stated competitive advantage. Flag if the client claims no competitors or if the advantage is generic (e.g., "better quality, better service") with [TO CONFIRM specifics required].

7. Team and Credentials

List key individuals, their roles, and relevant experience. Note any team gaps acknowledged by the client. If no team details were given, insert [TO CONFIRM founder/team profiles needed].

8. Financial Position and Funding History

State current revenue (or pre-revenue status), any funding received to date, the amount now being sought, and the intended use of funds. If projections exist, note them. Insert [TO CONFIRM] wherever financial data is absent or internally inconsistent.

9. The Ask Document Type, Audience, and Deadline

State the specific document required, who the primary reader is, the submission deadline, and any format requirements. If the audience is unclear, insert [TO CONFIRM primary decision-maker and their evaluation criteria].

10. Constraints, Sensitivities, and Special Requirements

Record any regulatory context, previous failed funding attempts, approval requirements, confidentiality restrictions, or other special circumstances disclosed by the client.

11. Consultant Assessment

Apply consultant judgement to the answers provided. Note:

• Gaps critical information that is absent entirely
• Contradictions statements that conflict with each other (e.g., claims market leadership but cannot name competitors)
• Risks assumptions that appear optimistic, unvalidated, or likely to be challenged by a funder
• Scope concerns whether the requested document type matches the stage and quality of available information

This section is for internal use and informs Phase 2 question selection.

12. Recommended Next Steps

State which downstream skills are ready to engage and in what order, based on the information available. Example:

• If a full business plan is requested: begin with 01-executive-summary, then proceed sequentially. Run meta-bankability-scoring before finalising 11-funding-request.
• If a bank loan proposal is the primary document: prioritise 10-financial-projections, 11-funding-request, and 12-risk-analysis first.
• If a grant application: begin with 11b-grant-proposal and cross-reference 13-implementation-timeline.
• If significant gaps remain: complete Phase 2 before engaging any section skill.
• If digitisation, systems redesign, channel modernisation, or platform strategy is central: run meta-digital-transformation before finalising Sections 07, 08, 10, 13, and 14.

---

Phase 2 Targeted Follow-Up Questions

Analyse the draft brief and generate 57 follow-up questions. These are not standard questions write them specifically for this client's answers. Do not use generic or templated language.

Prioritise follow-up on:

1. Anything that would change the document type, scope, or angle if answered differently
2. Missing financial data that makes any projection or funding ask unworkable
3. Contradictions in the answers (e.g., a startup claiming no competitors; a large ask with no evidence base)
4. Unclear audience who exactly will read the document and what they need to believe
5. Regulatory or sector-specific issues the client may not have flagged
6. Team gaps or governance concerns that a funder would raise immediately
7. Any [TO CONFIRM] marker in Sections 8 or 9 these are blocking gaps

Format each follow-up question as:

[Domain] Question [N] of [total] [The question, written directly to the client in plain language.] Why we are asking: [One sentence explaining what this unlocks.]

---

After Phase 2 Answers Are Received

1. Update the draft project brief replace all [TO CONFIRM] markers with the confirmed information.
2. Update Section 11 (Consultant Assessment) to reflect the complete picture.
3. Update Section 12 (Recommended Next Steps) with a confirmed sequence of downstream skills.
4. State explicitly: "This brief is finalised. It is ready to hand off to the following skills:" then list the specific skills by name.

Digital Readiness Supplement

When the business is digitally enabled, digitally exposed, operationally inefficient, omni-channel, or likely to need systems investment, ask these additional questions before handoff:

1. What systems do you currently use to run the business for sales, customer records, accounting, stock, delivery, production, reporting, or staff coordination?
2. Where are the biggest delays, manual tasks, double-entry tasks, or quality failures in the current workflow?
3. Which customer interactions already happen through digital channels website, WhatsApp, social media, email, marketplace platforms, mobile app, or POS?
4. What useful data do you currently collect, and what do you wish you could measure but cannot today?
5. Are there any planned technology investments website rebuild, CRM, ERP, e-commerce, automation, AI, mobile app, or new equipment with software?
6. What budget, skills, or trust constraints might limit digitisation or automation?

If these answers reveal a material digital-transformation question, route to meta-digital-transformation before or alongside 14-ai-integration.

---

Dreaming Room Supplement (for early-stage / pre-vision founders)

When Phase 1 answers reveal a founder at the Dream stage where the business idea is not yet fully formed, or where the mission and vision feel vague or generic use these supplementary questions before Phase 2, drawn from Gerber's Dreaming Room process (Gerber, 2008):

1. *What does the world look like when your business works exactly as you envision 10 years from now? *
2. Who is the one person whose life your business most changes? Describe them specifically.
3. *What is broken in this market that your business is determined to fix? *
4. *If your business grew to 100 locations, what would be the same in every single one? *
5. *What would be lost in the world if your business did not exist? *
6. *Are you building this business to create a better job for yourself or to build something that works without you? *

Diagnostic: Founders who cannot answer Question 4 (what stays the same at scale) are Technicians with an idea, not yet Entrepreneurs with a system. The business plan will need to address this explicitly in the company overview and management sections and the implementation timeline must include a systems-building phase.

See 02-company-overview/references/awakening-entrepreneur-gerber.md for the full Four Dimensions framework and Dream Vision Purpose Mission cascade.

Default Context

Unless the client specifies otherwise:

• Country context: Uganda / East Africa
• Currency: UGX (planning rate UGX 3,700 per USD)
• Regulatory references: URA, KCCA, UNBS, NEMA, Bank of Uganda
• Financial benchmarks: drawn from 10-financial-projections/references/uganda-tax-framework.md and 04-market-analysis/references/uganda-macro-context-2025.md

If the client specifies a different country, load the relevant country-context/{country}/SKILL.md before generating the brief.

---

Quality Criteria

A completed Phase 1 brief is acceptable when:

• All 12 sections are present, even if some contain [TO CONFIRM] markers
• Section 11 identifies at least one gap, one risk, and one contradiction where they exist
• Section 12 names specific downstream skills, not generic categories
• No section has been omitted because an answer was vague partial information is better than a blank section

A completed Phase 2 is acceptable when:

• Each follow-up question is specific to this client's answers, not generic
• Each question states clearly why it is being asked
• The set of 57 questions, if answered, would resolve all remaining [TO CONFIRM] markers in Sections 4, 7, 8, and 9 as a minimum
• No follow-up question duplicates information already provided in the 10 answers

A finalised brief (post Phase 2) is acceptable when:

• Zero [TO CONFIRM] markers remain in Sections 8, 9, and 10
• The Recommended Next Steps section names a specific ordered sequence of skills
• A downstream skill receiving this brief can begin work without returning to the client for basic information

July 2026 Portable Contract

Required Inputs

Input artefact	Source/provider	Required	Behaviour when absent
Completed ten-question client response pack for 00 client intake	Client or authorised engagement lead	Yes	If absent, the ten-question response pack is absent or too incomplete to identify the business and audience, return the unanswered intake questions and do not route section drafting.
Finalised business brief, target reader, country, and stage	Client intake and engagement owner	Yes	Stop section decisions and route the missing context to client intake.
Reconciled upstream assumptions that this section consumes	Named pipeline owners	Conditional	Record the dependency, affected claim, owner, and recovery step; do not substitute an invented value.

Outputs

Artefact	Consumer	Observable acceptance condition
Draft project brief and targeted follow-up register	Plan author and target decision-maker	The artefact answers the section decision and traces each material conclusion to the supplied evidence.
00 client intake exception and handoff note	Downstream section owners	Every blocked or conditional item names its consequence, owner, evidence request, and restart condition.
00 client intake release record	Reviewer or plan assembler	Records the checks completed, failures, unassessed items, professional review required, and release state.

Evidence Produced

Evidence	Format	Acceptance condition
Answer-to-brief trace and unresolved [TO CONFIRM] register	Source-linked table, calculation, or annotated prose	The evidence is reproducible from named inputs and distinguishes verified fact, management assumption, and inference.
00 client intake decision record	Decision note	States the selected action, rejected credible alternative, countercase, rationale, and risk accepted or avoided.
00 client intake review trace	Gate entry	Identifies the date, input versions, reviewer role, failed checks, recovery owner, and any check that remains not assessed.

Capability and Permission Boundaries

For 00 client intake, the controlling focus is ten-question answer integrity, client confidentiality, contradiction detection, [TO CONFIRM] gaps, audience classification, and project-brief handoff. This skill may ask the authorised client questions and draft the brief; it may not contact third parties, disclose confidential answers, or decide facts for the client. Its normal mode is read-only analysis and drafting. Any mutation, external communication, spending, certification, or professional conclusion outside that boundary requires explicit authority and must remain traceable to the approving role.

Degraded Mode

For 00 client intake, loss of evidence about 00 client intake evidence, decisions, failure thresholds, ownership, and downstream handoffs activates degraded mode. If the controlling 00 client intake evidence is unavailable, the same boundary applies. When the ten-question response pack is absent or too incomplete to identify the business and audience, return the unanswered intake questions and do not route section drafting. Return the verified subset, label the affected decision qualified or not assessed, explain the downstream consequence, and state the smallest evidence request or authorised action that permits recovery. Do not convert the missing check into a pass.

Decision Rules

Choice or condition	Action	Failure or risk avoided
For 00 client intake, an answer conflicts with another answer	quote both answers, mark the affected brief field [TO CONFIRM], and ask one resolving question	A fabricated intake baseline contaminates every downstream section
For 00 client intake, A current legal, regulatory, tax, accounting, market, or platform claim controls the 00 client intake decision	Verify the controlling source, effective date, jurisdiction, and reviewer status before release	Stale external facts become permanent plan assumptions
For 00 client intake, The evidence reconciles with neighbouring sections and the countercase does not overturn the choice	Complete draft project brief and targeted follow-up register, attach the evidence and release record, and hand off named dependencies	Premature release and repeated downstream rework

Workflow

1. Define the exact 00 client intake decision, intended reader, jurisdiction, business stage, and permission boundary.
2. Collect completed ten-question client response pack and map each material conclusion to its source; stop the affected conclusion when an input could change it.
3. Apply the specialist methods and directly linked references already contained in this skill, retaining its domain thresholds, calculations, and Uganda or East Africa context where applicable.
4. Compare the credible alternatives, test the countercase and failure path, and apply the decision table rather than selecting a template default.
5. Produce draft project brief and targeted follow-up register with the evidence, exception, and handoff records; reconcile every shared assumption with its owning section.
6. Run the section quality checks, applicable finance or professional review, and anti-slop gate. If a gate fails, correct the evidence or decision and return to the responsible step.

Quality Standards

• Draft project brief and targeted follow-up register must answer a real decision for the named bank, investor, DFI, grant, board, or strategic-partner reader.
• Answer-to-brief trace and unresolved [TO CONFIRM] register must be source-linked, dated where facts can change, and sufficient for another reviewer to reproduce the conclusion.
• The section exposes its countercase, stop condition, recovery action, and effect on neighbouring sections.
• No unavailable source, calculation, tool, or professional review is reported as passed; finance and statutory judgements follow the governing doctrine.
• Language remains specific to 00 client intake, uses British English naturally, and passes the repository anti-slop gate without promotional filler.

Anti-Patterns

• In 00 client intake, treating an unavailable completed ten-question client response pack as confirmed. Correction: qualify the affected conclusion and issue the named evidence request.
• Producing draft project brief and targeted follow-up register that restates the brief but makes no choice. Correction: record the choice, rejected alternative, rationale, countercase, and implication.
• Ignoring a conflicting upstream assumption. Correction: return it to its owning section and resume only from a reconciled version.
• Reporting an unavailable check as passed. Correction: mark it not assessed and narrow the release state.
• Claiming compliance, assurance, bankability, or investor readiness from narrative quality. Correction: run the applicable gate and retain its evidence.
• Copying the worked example into a client plan. Correction: use the method only and replace every fact with verified engagement evidence.

Worked Example

A founder states that the venture is pre-revenue in Question 1 but reports monthly sales in Question 5. Preserve both statements, flag stage and revenue, and request the first invoice date and current monthly sales.

References

• Use the verified project evidence register and the owning upstream pipeline section for 00 client intake; no local deep-dive reference is declared.
• For 00 client intake claims involving money, tax, grants, reserves, revenue, cost, valuation, or financial statements, apply the Chwezi finance doctrine and record the required professional-review state; illustrative figures never become client facts.