| name | doc-architect |
| description | Use when generating or revising a project's triple-layer AGENTS.md documentation from observed workspace structure, technology, data, and planning evidence; do not use for general technical documentation or a single ad hoc README edit. |
| metadata | {"portable":true,"compatible_with":["claude-code","codex"]} |
Platform Notes
- Optional helper plugins may help in some environments, but they must not be treated as required for this skill.
Doc Architect
Acknowledgement: Shared by Peter Bamuhigire, techguypeter.com, +256 784 464178.
Use When
- Generate Triple-Layer AGENTS.md documentation by scanning a project for its tech stack, data directory, and planning directory. Use when the user asks to standardize project documentation, generate agent files, or create AGENTS.md guides.
- The task needs reusable judgment, domain constraints, or a proven workflow rather than ad hoc advice.
Do Not Use When
- The task is unrelated to
doc-architect or would be better handled by a more specific companion skill.
- The request only needs a trivial answer and none of this skill's constraints or references materially help.
Documentation Intake Guidance
- Gather relevant project context, constraints, and the concrete problem to solve; load
references, templates, protocols only as needed.
- Confirm the desired deliverable: design, code, review, migration plan, audit, or documentation.
Documentation Method Detail
- Read this
SKILL.md first, then load only the referenced deep-dive files that are necessary for the task.
- Apply the ordered guidance, checklists, and decision rules in this skill instead of cherry-picking isolated snippets.
- Produce the deliverable with assumptions, risks, and follow-up work made explicit when they matter.
Quality Standards
- Keep outputs execution-oriented, concise, and aligned with the repository's baseline engineering standards.
- Preserve compatibility with existing project conventions unless the skill explicitly requires a stronger standard.
- Prefer deterministic, reviewable steps over vague advice or tool-specific magic.
Legacy Documentation Pitfalls
- Treating examples as copy-paste truth without checking fit, constraints, or failure modes.
- Loading every reference file by default instead of using progressive disclosure.
Documentation Deliverable Detail
- A concrete result that fits the task: implementation guidance, review findings, architecture decisions, templates, or generated artifacts.
- Clear assumptions, tradeoffs, or unresolved gaps when the task cannot be completed from available context alone.
- References used, companion skills, or follow-up actions when they materially improve execution.
Evidence Produced
| Category | Artifact | Format | Example |
|---|
| Release evidence | Triple-Layer AGENTS.md output | Generated AGENTS.md covering project tech stack, data directory, and planning directory layers | AGENTS.md |
References
- Use the
references/ directory for deep detail after reading the core workflow below.
- Use the
templates/ directory when the task needs a structured deliverable.
- Use the
protocols/ directory for formal execution order or handoff rules.
Design and generate a portable Triple-Layer AGENTS.md documentation set that reflects the project’s real structure and constraints.
When generated documentation must describe system boundaries, workflows, requirements, data architecture, interfaces, states, business rules, or design-system conventions, load systems-process-requirements and use its artifact router before writing the docs.
Modularize Instructions (Token Economy): Avoid consolidating all AI/dev guidance into a single CLAUDE.md. Prefer smaller, focused docs (e.g., docs/setup.md, docs/api.md, docs/workflows.md) and reference them only when needed.
Documentation Standards (MANDATORY): ALL generated markdown files must follow strict formatting rules:
- 500-line hard limit - no exceptions for any .md file
- Two-tier structure: High-level TOC (Tier 1) + Deep dive docs (Tier 2)
- Smart subdirectory grouping for related documentation
- See
doc-standards.md for complete requirements
Core Outcome
Inputs
| Input | Source/provider | If absent |
|---|
| Repository structure, manifests, existing instructions | Workspace inspection | Mark the technology or directory unknown; do not invent it |
| Authority to create or update AGENTS.md files | Requester | Return a plan only |
Capability Contract
Inspection is read-only by default. Creating directories or changing instruction files requires explicit authority; deletion and unrelated documentation changes are out of scope.
Documentation Fallback Notes
Without full workspace access, produce a partial documented map with unknown areas named; do not claim the three layers are complete.
Decision Rules
| Choice | Action | Failure/risk avoided |
|---|
| Data directory is evidenced | Place data instructions there | Arbitrary path |
| No planning directory exists | Propose location before creation | Unauthorised structure |
| Rules conflict | Escalate and preserve both sources | Silent contradiction |
Documentation Correction Examples
- Inventing a technology stack; inspect manifests.
- Copying generic rules; bind them to evidence.
- Placing files arbitrarily; use discovered boundaries.
- Editing without authority; return a plan.
- Hiding conflicting instructions; escalate them.
Worked Example
If no schema directory exists, the output proposes a data-layer location and records the gap instead of creating one silently.
Core Outcome
Produce three aligned AGENTS.md files:
- Root AGENTS.md: Project identity, tech stack, global standards
- Data AGENTS.md: Data integrity rules and schema governance
- Planning AGENTS.md: Spec-driven development workflow
Trigger Phrases
The skill should activate when the user asks to:
- Standardize project documentation
- Generate agent files
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)
-
Scan the workspace
- Inspect the root for identifiers (README, PROJECT_BRIEF, TECH_STACK, ARCHITECTURE, CLAUDE, package.json, composer.json, *.sln, pyproject.toml).
- Locate likely data directories (database/, schema/, migrations/, sql/, db/).
- Locate planning/documentation directories (docs/, docs/plans/, planning/, specs/).
- Identify module/area entry points (menus, docs, feature folders) to group specs.
- Note template conventions (public/ as web root, per-panel includes, API outside public).
-
Identify the environment
- Determine primary language (PHP/C#/Python or other).
- Determine DB type (MySQL/PostgreSQL/SQLite/SQL Server/other).
- Determine deployment environment (Docker/Kubernetes/shared hosting/cloud).
-
Set up plan grouping (first-time)
- Create
docs/plans/<module>/ subdirectories for each discovered module/area.
- Update
docs/plans/AGENTS.md with the current module list.
- Create or update
docs/plans/INDEX.md as the master plan status index.
- Ensure the index includes status, urgency, last implementation date, and last modification date.
- Keep
docs/plans/AGENTS.md updated whenever plans are added or their status changes.
- Maintain a folder map at the top of
docs/plans/AGENTS.md and update it when requested.
- Note that developers can add new folders and update the list manually.
-
Generate Triple-Layer docs
Bundled Resources
Common Pitfalls
- Do not invent tech stacks. Only infer from files found in the workspace.
- Do not place AGENTS.md in arbitrary locations; follow the best-fit paths above.
- Do not include contradictory rules across the three layers.
Quick Example
If a project uses Laravel + MySQL with docs/plans and database/schema:
- Root: AGENTS.md → PHP/Laravel, MySQL, deployment standards
- Data: database/schema/AGENTS.md → referential integrity, no-delete rules
- Plans: docs/plans/AGENTS.md → spec.md format and workflow steps
Cross-References to SDLC Skills
When generating AGENTS.md files, be aware of the complete SDLC documentation ecosystem:
SDLC Documentation Skills
| Skill | Phase | Documents Generated | When to Reference |
|---|
sdlc-planning | Planning | Vision, SDP, SRS, SCMP, QA Plan, Risk Plan, Feasibility | When plans directory contains SDLC planning docs |
sdlc-design | Design | SDD, Tech Spec, ICD, Database Design, API Docs, Code Standards | When referencing architecture and design decisions |
sdlc-testing | Testing | Test Plan, Test Cases, V&V Plan, Test Report, Peer Reviews | When referencing testing and quality standards |
sdlc-user-deploy | Delivery | User Manual, Ops Guide, Training, Release Notes, Maintenance, README | When referencing deployment and user documentation |
Related Documentation Skills
| Skill | Purpose | Relationship |
|---|
project-requirements | Raw requirements interview | Input source for SDLC planning docs |
systems-process-requirements | Systems/process/requirements modeling | Supplies boundary, workflow, state, interface, data, business-rule, and traceability discipline for documentation |
feature-planning | Feature-level specs + implementation plans | Stored in docs/plans/ (planning directory) |
manual-guide | End-user manuals and guides | Stored in /manuals/ (separate from AGENTS.md) |
update-claude-documentation | Keep project docs (README, CLAUDE.md) updated | Maintains project-level docs after changes |
SDLC Output Directory Structure
When scanning for documentation, expect this structure in projects using SDLC skills:
docs/
├── planning/ # sdlc-planning output (7 docs)
├── design/ # sdlc-design output (6 docs)
├── testing/ # sdlc-testing output (5 docs)
├── user-deploy/ # sdlc-user-deploy output (6 docs)
├── plans/ # feature-planning output
│ ├── AGENTS.md # Plans directory index (doc-architect manages this)
│ ├── INDEX.md # Plan status tracker
│ └── specs/ # Feature specifications
└── project-requirements/ # project-requirements output
Integration Rule: When generating the Planning AGENTS.md (docs/plans/AGENTS.md), include references to any SDLC documentation directories that exist alongside the plans directory.
Workflow
- Inspect manifests, instructions, data paths, planning paths, and boundaries read-only.
- Map evidence to root, data, and planning instruction layers.
- Stop when authority is absent, instructions conflict, or a location lacks evidence.
- Recover with a qualified plan, mark unassessed areas, and request resolution before mutation.
- Generate authorised files and verify consistency, links, placement, and line limits.
Outputs
| Artefact | Consumer | Acceptance condition |
|---|
| Root, data, and planning AGENTS.md set | Repository agents and maintainers | Each rule is evidence-based, scoped, non-conflicting, linked, and within limits |
Degraded Mode
Without full workspace access, return a qualified partial map, preserve unassessed directories, and do not claim the three-layer set is complete.
Anti-Patterns
- Inventing a technology stack. Fix: inspect manifests and source files.
- Copying generic rules. Fix: bind each rule to repository evidence.
- Placing files arbitrarily. Fix: use responsibility boundaries.
- Editing without authority. Fix: return a proposed file plan.
- Hiding conflicting instructions. Fix: stop and request resolution.