design-training-program

Design a GxP training programme covering training needs analysis by role, curriculum design (regulatory awareness, system-specific, data integrity), competency assessment criteria, training record retention, and retraining triggers for SOP revisions and incidents. Use when a new validated system requires user training before go-live, an audit finding cites inadequate training, organisational changes introduce new roles, a periodic programme review is due, or inspection preparation requires demonstrating training adequacy.

Jump to install

Repository: pjt222/agent-almanac
Last source activity: April 24, 2026 at 05:45
Detected SKILL.md language: English
Stars: 30
Forks: 4

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Back to search Back to installation

name	design-training-program
locale	caveman
source_locale	en
source_commit	82c77053
translator	Julius Brussee homage — caveman
translation_date	2026-04-24
description	Design a GxP training programme covering training needs analysis by role, curriculum design (regulatory awareness, system-specific, data integrity), competency assessment criteria, training record retention, and retraining triggers for SOP revisions and incidents. Use when a new validated system requires user training before go-live, an audit finding cites inadequate training, organisational changes introduce new roles, a periodic programme review is due, or inspection preparation requires demonstrating training adequacy.
license	MIT
allowed-tools	Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob
metadata	{"author":"Philipp Thoss","version":"1.0","domain":"compliance","complexity":"intermediate","language":"multi","tags":"gxp, training, competency, compliance, quality-management, curriculum"}

Design Training Program

Role-based GxP training programme. Curriculum, competency assessments, record management for regulated env.

When Use

New validated system needs user training before go-live
Audit finding cites bad training or missing training records
Org changes bring new roles or responsibilities
Periodic review of training programme due
Regulatory inspection prep needs proof of training adequacy

Inputs

Required: Systems + processes needing trained personnel
Required: Role definitions (admin, user, QA, management)
Required: Regulatory training requirements (GMP, GLP, GCP)
Optional: Existing training materials or curricula
Optional: Competency gaps from audits or perf reviews
Optional: Training management system capabilities

Steps

Step 1: Do Training Needs Analysis

Find what each role needs to know:

# Training Needs Analysis
## Document ID: TNA-[DEPT]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### Role-Based Training Requirements

| Role | GxP Awareness | System Training | Data Integrity | SOP Training | Assessment Type |
|------|--------------|----------------|----------------|--------------|-----------------|
| System Administrator | Advanced | Advanced | Advanced | Admin SOPs | Written + Practical |
| End User | Basic | Intermediate | Intermediate | Operational SOPs | Written + Practical |
| QA Reviewer | Advanced | Basic (review focus) | Advanced | QA SOPs | Written |
| Management | Basic | Overview only | Intermediate | Governance SOPs | Written |
| IT Support | Basic | Infrastructure only | Basic | IT SOPs | Written |

### Training Gap Analysis
| Role | Current Competency | Required Competency | Gap | Priority |
|------|-------------------|---------------------|-----|----------|
| [Role] | [Current level] | [Required level] | [Gap description] | [H/M/L] |

Got: Every role has training needs linked to job function + GxP responsibilities.

If fail: Roles unclear? Do RACI first. Set responsibilities before training needs.

Step 2: Design Curriculum

Break training into modules by topic:

# Training Curriculum
## Document ID: TC-[DEPT]-[YYYY]-[NNN]


 2 hours |  Classroom / eLearning |  All roles

 Introduction to GxP regulations (GMP, GLP, GCP overview)
 21 CFR Part 11 and EU Annex 11 requirements for electronic records
 Data integrity principles (ALCOA+)
 Consequences of non-compliance (warning letters, consent decrees, product recalls)
 Individual responsibilities and accountability


 4 hours |  Instructor-led with hands-on |  Users, Admins

 System purpose and GxP classification
 Login, navigation, and role-based access
 Core workflows (step-by-step for each user task)
 Electronic signature procedures
 Audit trail: how entries are created and what they mean
 Error handling and deviation reporting
 Data entry best practices


 1.5 hours |  Workshop |  Users, QA, Admins

 ALCOA+ principles with system-specific examples
 Common data integrity risks and how to avoid them
 Recognising and reporting data integrity concerns
 Audit trail review basics
 Case studies: real-world data integrity failures and lessons learned


 1 hour per SOP |  Read and sign / walkthrough |  Per SOP scope

 SOP purpose and scope
 Step-by-step procedure walkthrough
 Decision points and deviation handling
 Forms and documentation requirements
 Q&A and clarification

# Competency Assessment Design

### Assessment Types
| Type | When to Use | Passing Score | Records |
|------|------------|---------------|---------|
| **Written test** | Knowledge assessment (regulations, principles) | 80% | Score sheet retained |
| **Practical demonstration** | Skill assessment (system operation) | All critical steps correct | Signed observation form |
| **Observed task** | On-the-job competency | Supervisor sign-off | Competency form |

### Sample Written Assessment — GxP Awareness (Module 1)
1. List the five ALCOA principles for data integrity. (5 points)
2. Under 21 CFR 11.50, what three elements must an electronic signature display? (3 points)
3. You discover that a colleague's data entry contains an error. Describe the correct procedure to correct it. (5 points)
4. True/False: A shared login account can be used if all users sign a logbook. (2 points — answer: False)
5. Describe one consequence of a data integrity failure for a pharmaceutical company. (5 points)

**Passing score:** 16/20 (80%)
**On failure:** Retraining required before re-assessment. Maximum 2 re-attempts.

### Practical Assessment Template
| Step | Task | Observed? | Performed Correctly? | Comments |
|------|------|-----------|---------------------|----------|
| 1 | Log in with personal credentials | Yes/No | Yes/No | |
| 2 | Navigate to [specific function] | Yes/No | Yes/No | |
| 3 | Enter test data correctly | Yes/No | Yes/No | |
| 4 | Apply electronic signature | Yes/No | Yes/No | |
| 5 | Locate and interpret audit trail | Yes/No | Yes/No | |

**Assessor:** _______ **Date:** _______ **Result:** Pass / Fail

# Training Record Management

### Required Training Records
| Record | Format | Retention Period | Storage |
|--------|--------|-----------------|---------|
| Training matrix (who needs what) | Electronic | Current + 2 years superseded | Training management system |
| Individual training transcript | Electronic | Employment + 2 years | Training management system |
| Assessment results | Electronic or paper | Same as transcript | Training management system |
| Training materials (version used) | Electronic | Life of system + 1 year | Document management system |
| Trainer qualification records | Electronic | Employment + 2 years | HR system |

### Training Matrix Template
| Employee | Role | Module 1 | Module 2 | Module 3 | SOP-001 | SOP-002 | Status |
|----------|------|----------|----------|----------|---------|---------|--------|
| J. Smith | User | 2026-01-15 ✓ | 2026-01-16 ✓ | Due 2026-03-01 | 2026-01-20 ✓ | N/A | Partially trained |
| K. Jones | Admin | 2026-01-15 ✓ | 2026-01-17 ✓ | 2026-01-18 ✓ | 2026-01-20 ✓ | 2026-01-20 ✓ | Fully trained |

# Retraining Triggers

| Trigger | Scope | Timeline | Assessment Required? |
|---------|-------|----------|---------------------|
| SOP revision (minor) | Affected users — read and sign | Before new version effective | No — read and acknowledge |
| SOP revision (major) | Affected users — formal retraining | Before new version effective | Yes — written or practical |
| System upgrade | All users of affected functionality | Before production go-live | Yes — practical demonstration |
| Data integrity incident | Involved personnel + department | Within 30 days of investigation closure | Yes — written |
| Audit finding (training-related) | Per CAPA scope | Per CAPA timeline | Per CAPA requirements |
| Annual refresher | All GxP personnel | Annual from initial training date | No — refresher acknowledgement |
| Role change | Individual | Before assuming new responsibilities | Yes — per new role requirements |
| Extended absence (>6 months) | Returning individual | Before resuming GxP activities | Yes — practical assessment |

# Training Programme
## Document ID: TRAINING-PROGRAM-[DEPT]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### 1. Purpose and Scope
### 2. Training Needs Analysis [Step 1]
### 3. Curriculum [Step 2]
### 4. Competency Assessments [Step 3]
### 5. Training Records and Retention [Step 4]
### 6. Retraining Triggers [Step 5]
### 7. Programme Review
- Annual review of training effectiveness (pass rates, audit findings, incidents)
- Curriculum update when systems, SOPs, or regulations change
- Trainer qualification verification

### 8. Approval
| Role | Name | Signature | Date |
|------|------|-----------|------|
| Training Manager | | | |
| QA Director | | | |
| Department Head | | | |